• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Judge Orders Release Of Hundreds Arrested During Immigration Raids

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,515
9,466
52
✟401,651.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Yeah, shame on him. We all know that when protecting the purity of our cultural institutions from foreigners the end definitley justifies the means.
Especially those no goodniks who also look like foreigners. Well foreigners compared to a specific previous wave of colonial foreigners who are now native. But not the actual native population.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,515
9,466
52
✟401,651.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
The end does not justify the means, bringing in illegals for exploitation is wrong.
But there are so many in circulation that it would be impossible to remove them from civilian hands.

And besides immigrants are not inherently good or bad. It’s the people using them as cheap labour in factories who are.

Have you never listened to the late great DMX?
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
7,491
2,850
South
✟199,992.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What is it about that fact that entering this country illegally is a crime that many liberals just can’t understand? What is it about rogue judges who hate Trump who use their power for their own political whims that many liberals just can’t understand. Rouge judges who have disgraced their oaths are a big part of the problem
  • A Harvard Law Review dataset (covering injunctions since 1963, through 2023) found 127 nationwide injunctions in total — 64 of those were issued against policies of the Trump administration and 63 were issued against all other presidents. This is a disgrace on many of the rogue judges who have lost their way and let hatred of Trump control their decisions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: rjs330
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,151
47,159
Los Angeles Area
✟1,052,431.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Its not at all up to a judge to determine if a person is in violation of immigration law.
That was not at issue. What was at issue was whether 615 people who were not subject to mandatory detention were actually subject to mandatory detention. They aren't, by definition. And whether others, who pose no safety risk, were eligible for bond. They are.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
29,318
9,441
66
✟454,299.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
That was not at issue. What was at issue was whether 615 people who were not subject to mandatory detention were actually subject to mandatory detention. They aren't, by definition. And whether others, who pose no safety risk, were eligible for bond. They are.
Mandatory detention by immigration officials for violation of immigration law. That judge has no authority to regulate whether or not a person is in violation of immigration law and subject to detention over it. Thats for the immigration courts to decide.
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
7,491
2,850
South
✟199,992.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What is it about that fact that entering this country illegally is a crime that many liberals just can’t understand? What is it about rogue judges who hate Trump who use their power for their own political whims that many liberals just can’t understand. Rouge judges who have disgraced their oaths are a big part of the problem
  • A Harvard Law Review dataset (covering injunctions since 1963, through 2023) found 127 nationwide injunctions in total — 64 of those were issued against policies of the Trump administration and 63 were issued against all other presidents. This is a disgrace on many of the rogue judges who have lost their way and let hatred of Trump control their decisions.
Update: we can add at least 25 more to the 64. Total 89 against Trump only 63 against all other presidents since 1963. Anyone else smell a rat here?
 
Upvote 0