• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Supreme Court rejects Kim Davis’ request to reconsider landmark gay marriage ruling

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
185,081
67,814
Woods
✟6,121,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected a petition filed by former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis to reconsider the 2015 ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.

In an orders list released Monday morning, the high court denied without comment a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of Kim Davis v. David Ermold, et al.

Additionally, the Supreme Court denied a motion from the Alabama-based conservative group Foundation for Moral Law to file a friend-of-the-court brief "out of time."

In June 2015, the nation's high court ruled 5-4 in Obergefell v. Hodges that states could not ban same-sex marriage, concluding that the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protected the unions.

Continued below.
 

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,353
22,049
30
Nebraska
✟879,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Just one of many reasons America will eventually be judged. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow... but it will be.
Agreed. The lack of sense of sin is our greatest failing, imo.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Delvianna
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
17,342
4,449
Louisville, Ky
✟1,053,626.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Just one of many reasons America will eventually be judged. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow... but it will be.
Why would America be judged for what a panel of judges ruled?
 
Upvote 0

Delvianna

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2025
495
365
39
Florida
✟12,067.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why would America be judged for what a panel of judges ruled?
Because it makes it the law of the land. It's like if a panel of judges ruled on allowing people to just murder who ever they want, because the judges are part ruling the country, the nation will be judged when murder sky rockets.
 
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
17,342
4,449
Louisville, Ky
✟1,053,626.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Because it makes it the law of the land. It's like if a panel of judges ruled on allowing people to just murder who ever they want, because the judges are part ruling the country, the nation will be judged when murder sky rockets.
So, Americans that disagree with the ruling are as guilty as the judges?
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
30,003
13,443
78
✟449,898.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Because it makes it the law of the land. It's like if a panel of judges ruled on allowing people to just murder who ever they want, because the judges are part ruling the country, the nation will be judged when murder sky rockets.
I'm trying to figure out how allowing couples to marry each other will harm the rest of us. I don't recall Jesus declaring that government control was the answer to sin. If He didn't think it was worth mentioning, why should be think it's how a nation will be judged?
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,353
22,049
30
Nebraska
✟879,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I'm trying to figure out how allowing couples to marry each other will harm the rest of us. I don't recall Jesus declaring that government control was the answer to sin. If He didn't think it was worth mentioning, why should be think it's how a nation will be judged?
They harm themselves spiritually, that’s for sure, and forcing others to provide for services when others believe it’s wrong or immoral is never ok. They cannot impose their “values” onto others. It’s a two way street.

Jesus told the woman caught in adultery, “go and sin no more.”
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,353
22,049
30
Nebraska
✟879,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Delvianna

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2025
495
365
39
Florida
✟12,067.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I'm trying to figure out how allowing couples to marry each other will harm the rest of us. I don't recall Jesus declaring that government control was the answer to sin. If He didn't think it was worth mentioning, why should be think it's how a nation will be judged?
There's examples in scripture where a leadership promoted sin, and thus, the entire nation was judged.

The Lord had humbled Judah because of Ahaz king of Israel, for he had promoted wickedness in Judah and had been most unfaithful to the Lord" - (2 Chronicles 28:19)
Surely these things happened to Judah according to the Lord’s command, in order to remove them from his presence because of the sins of Manasseh and all he had done, including the shedding of innocent blood. For he had filled Jerusalem with innocent blood, and the Lord was not willing to forgive. - (2 Kings 24:3-4)
Who ever is in power and what they do, absolutely has consequences. So since God is against gay relationships in general, the promotion and allowance of it, will absolutely have consequences. It's not about it "harming" us in the sense like physical violence, but it is "harming" in the sense of spiritual righteousness. When you promote and allow sin to run rampant, eventually the country is judged. Just like Sodom, just like Gomorrah, Babylon and others. The world screams "tolerance" but Gods rules are applied to every single person living on this planet and he has the right to judge when he's had enough.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
30,003
13,443
78
✟449,898.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Who ever is in power and what they do, absolutely has consequences. So since God is against gay relationships in general, the promotion and allowance of it, will absolutely have consequences. It's not about it "harming" us in the sense like physical violence, but it is "harming" in the sense of spiritual righteousness. When you promote and allow sin to run rampant, eventually the country is judged. Just like Sodom, just like Gomorrah, Babylon and others. The world screams "tolerance" but Gods rules are applied to every single person living on this planet and he has the right to judge when he's had enough.
I notice that Jesus didn't call for government force to make people avoid sin. I notice that of all the sins that are, His focus was not on homosexuality. He didn't even mention it, as far as we know. That being so, I doubt if homosexual marriage is going to harm America.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
30,003
13,443
78
✟449,898.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
They harm themselves spiritually, that’s for sure, and forcing others to provide for services when others believe it’s wrong or immoral is never ok. They cannot impose their “values” onto others. It’s a two way street.

Jesus told the woman caught in adultery, “go and sin no more.”
I get the issue. For example, the baker who didn't want to make a wedding cake for same sex couple. On the other hand, a government official would have to avoid any discrimination in that regard. Private vs. public.
 
Upvote 0