-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Should pulpits remain silent on politics?
- Thread starter Michie
- Start date
Ignatius the Kiwi
Dissident
- Mar 2, 2013
- 8,861
- 4,703
- Country
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
So between St John and you there were no Christians? Have you started your own Church? Are you the great restorer of the Gospel? A new Joseph Smith?
If you're going to condemn past Christians, despite knowing nothing of Church history, how can you claim to condemn them on any reasonable basis? I can make a pretty good case for condemning certain historical figures, their faults, the good they did, the downright evil actions they did, but this is based on actually knowing something about history and not assuming that everyone before me was some cartoonish super villain.
I might suggest Timothy that we can actually learn from Christians before us. That we have things like the Nicene Creed for a reason, which I presume you agree with.
Upvote
0
Ignatius the Kiwi
Dissident
- Mar 2, 2013
- 8,861
- 4,703
- Country
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
The Nicene Creed was literally written by a group of three hundred or so Bishops for the sake of religious instruction regarding who Christ is and his relation to the Church. Isn't this the sort of thing you hate? Also it was organized by Constantine a man you've said claimed to be a god (with no proof).
You are just being inconsistent. Why don't you condemn the Nicene Creed and repudiate it? Is it not 'man made,' by the people in the past you hate because they weren't perfect Christians?
Upvote
0
Ignatius the Kiwi
Dissident
- Mar 2, 2013
- 8,861
- 4,703
- Country
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
They did a bit more than simply compile the bible, what they did was articulate biblical ideas in a way which is not natural to the bible. Terms like Hypostases which have a rich use in Greek philosophy and they articulated in explicit detail the ideas of the Trinity as a doctrine which had been formulating over the last 300 years since Christ. They understood themselves as being in continuity with the Christians who came before them, as carrying on that. They didn't neglect that connection or consider it superficial, like you do.
Yet we've gone off the discussion, mainly because you don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to this subject other than vague aphorisms of 'the kingdom is not of this world!', as if that means anything. By this same statement repeated ad nauseum you could stop all worldly activity and you have no ground respond, because ultimately it's a sort of Gnostic superiority you're appealing to. Not the first time you've done this by the way. It's a shallow worldview which views people as villains incapable of being complex and human. Constantine was the villain of Christian history who corrupted the Church by wedding it to the Roman State! If only the Church maintained it's purity and didn't become joined at the hip with Rome, then the world and the Church would be so much better!
Yet whenever I here this I never actually see this demonstrated. Yes it's impossible to demonstrate a hypothetical but when it's pointed out that there were good things that this change accomplished, there is this need here for many to endlessly deconstruct it, because it's almost an axiom at this point that the Church plus power equals bad. Yet I've not had anyone here say that it was wrong to outlaw pagan worship, because it wasn't. That it was wrong to outlaw crucifixion, because it wasn't. That it was bad that Christianity was promulgated even more so throughout the Empire, because it wasn't. Instead we get told that the majority of them weren't true Christians therefore it still shouldn't have happened that way and I'm left wondering what the people who want Christianity out of power want.
I can only conclude they want Christians powerless, unable to defend themselves, unable to organize as a political community and be utterly subject to powers that do not have their best interests at heart. They seem to lament the fact that persecution towards Christians stopped, that Pagan Rome disappeared.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Ignatius the Kiwi
Dissident
- Mar 2, 2013
- 8,861
- 4,703
- Country
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
This conversation is clearly over and you have no intention on engaging. Have a good day and try actually reading some of the Church Fathers, try actually reading some Church history. There were Christians before you and it's thanks to them you have the bible today and that you are a Christian today.
Upvote
0
timothyu
Well-Known Member
- Dec 31, 2018
- 24,603
- 9,238
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
Yes God used the gentiles to forward the scriptures. It is the Word of God, not man or our religions That matter. Remember who Jesus' adversaries were... organized religion. They have been notorious for taking what God has given us and making it over to support their own image.
Upvote
0
Ignatius the Kiwi
Dissident
- Mar 2, 2013
- 8,861
- 4,703
- Country
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
He also used Christians to further the word of God. In fact he used us primarily. I understand you think there were no Christians before you but there's actually a long list of historical men and women we can point to who helped to spread the Gospel. Priests, monks, kings, Queens, laymen. But your faith is in a book, you don't believe in the Church, which faded from history and didnt appear until you read a book called the bible.
The brain of a Protestant on Solo Scriptura is truly disturbing.
Upvote
0
- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,335
- 11,887
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Pastors should stick to moral issues - leave out politics.In 1873, Charles Finney wrote to pastors challenging them to raise the moral standards of the nation through preaching.
He concluded: “If Satan rules in our halls of legislation, the pulpit is responsible for it. If our politics become so corrupt that the very foundations of our government are ready to fall away, the pulpit is responsible for it.”
In 1980, a very similar argument was raised by Jerry Falwell, Tim LaHaye, and other leading pastors as they launched the Moral Majority. Churches had been lured into silence on moral issues that were prevalent in politics, and we were reaping unwelcome consequences from our inaction. Cal Thomas and I were both involved in leadership positions in the Moral Majority in 1980 and were—and I believe, still are—friends.
However, Cal’s recent column decries the idea that pastors exercise their right to fully preach about moral and political issues, along with giving their candid views on political candidates who have such a significant impact on these issues.
Continued below.
Should pulpits remain silent on politics?
Should churches avoid talking about political issueswww.christianpost.com
The Bible is not concerned with "guns or butter" issues in the state.
It is concerned with morality. The Cross, the Gospel
Freedom of religion
Freedom to evangelize rather than a state-religion that persecutes all other Christian groups... etc.
Marriage between one man and one woman - Gen 2.
Thou shalt not murder Ex 20 -- no abortion
Definition of man and woman in Gen 1 and 2.
Freedom to worship God according to the dictates of conscience.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
