What is the sudden attraction to children?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,729
12,120
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟650,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
There don't seem to have been any crimes, so why would there be consequences?
Every action has a consequence, crime or otherwise.
I learned how to use a computer and the internet. As a consequence, I can stay in contact with relatives.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,729
12,120
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟650,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
DQST is promoting reading. Honi soit qui mal y pense.
From that organization's own site: "DSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models."

So it's not about promoting reading. They want kids to see queer people as role models. (Unless you think they're lying about their intentions)
 
  • Winner
Reactions: hislegacy
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
1,560
1,525
26
Seattle
✟118,397.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Hear this now!
We need more patriots to step up and stop this drag queen grooming reading hours.
Patriots like this:
1685297342838.png
 
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,852
14,000
Broken Arrow, OK
✟699,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
We have had cross dressers and drag queens almost for as long as we have been a country. They have been in movies, in vaudeville, shows (Remember Rue Paul?) televisions shows etc. But in the last 18 months they have been attracted to children (I am NOT speaking sexually) (repeat, I AM NOT SPEAKING SEXUALLLY) (REPEAT, I AM NOT SPEAKING SEXUALLY).

My curiosity asks why? I'm not asking if it is right or wrong - I am asking what is their motivation to read books to children?

It's just so antithetical to their purposes and audiences of the past. Their mission has always been entertaining and titillating mostly a male dominated adult audience.

What is their purpose?

Hear this now!
We need more patriots to step up and stop this drag queen grooming reading hours.
Patriots like this:
 
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
1,560
1,525
26
Seattle
✟118,397.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
How so? It's incredibly offensive to women.
A man putting on makeup and costume to look like a woman--and a very bad representation of one at that?
No different from a white person putting on black makeup to make himself look like a black person.
Yet we don't hear women extolling how offensive it is.
Both of those phenomenons have a premise, a history, and they aren't even close to being the same.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,729
12,120
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟650,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yet we don't hear women extolling how offensive it is.
Both of those phenomenons have a premise, a history, and they aren't even close to being the same.
Please use Google before you post. It would save others the trouble of having to correct your assertions.



 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
1,560
1,525
26
Seattle
✟118,397.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Please use Google before you post. It would save others the trouble of having to correct your assertions.



I hate when people just throw links over the fence and expect others to anticipate the point of those throwing it over the fence.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,729
12,120
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟650,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I hate when people just throw links over the fence and expect others to anticipate the point of those throwing it over the fence.
You could have simply clicked on any or all the links to realize that they refute what you claimed.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: HARK!
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,138
36,472
Los Angeles Area
✟827,572.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Clarify what you mean.
You wrote:
"There haven't been any consequences for" [drag queens].

And then fobbed off my question with some tautological platitiude about "Every action has a consequence"

If that second sentence was sincerely meant to clarify your first statement, rather than obscure your untenable position, then it can't be true that drag queens have faced no consequences, because every action has a consequence.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
1,560
1,525
26
Seattle
✟118,397.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
You could have simply clicked on any or all the links to realize that they refute what you claimed.
Wouldn't it be easier to just state what I said and and then post the relevant quotes that refutes what I said?
I am not going to try to figure out your point.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,729
12,120
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟650,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
You wrote:
"There haven't been any consequences for" [drag queens].

And then fobbed off my question with some tautological platitiude about "Every action has a consequence"

If that second sentence was sincerely meant to clarify your first statement, rather than obscure your untenable position, then it can't be true that drag queens have faced no consequences, because every action has a consequence.
On second thought, there have been consequences for what they've done. None of them good. Same goes for drag queens being used to recruit for the military, or sell Bud Lite.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mayzoo

Well-Known Member
Jun 17, 2004
4,177
1,569
✟204,635.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I can't help but notice the complete lack of threads here (or right-wing propaganda in a wider scope) about the evils of divorced people being around children.
Instead, for some reason, there seems to be a sudden and specific focus from those sources on a very particular type of people.
Divorced (without biblical cause), tax evaders, liars, adulterers, greedy, gluttonous, prideful, fornicators, etc...... They are all a-ok to be around kids. It is far more likely that those who fornicate will lead kids astray than a homosexual "turning" a kid homosexual. Most the population could never, ever choose to be gay if they were paid to do so. But being convinced fornication is perfectly ok is very easy to do. What about eating, or drinking alcohol to the point of gluttony? Very easy to convince someone that is ok to do.

Do we see threads saying single people who are living with a heterosexual partner should not be around children? Do we see threads on someone who drinks or eats to excess frequently should not be around children? From what I have seen it is only a tiny subset of folks people worry about. If people want to protect the kids from being lead astray, pick the most likely candidates, not the least likely.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,729
12,120
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟650,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Divorced (without biblical cause), tax evaders, liars, adulterers, greedy, gluttonous, prideful, fornicators, etc...... They are all a-ok to be around kids. It is far more likely that those who fornicate will lead kids astray than a homosexual "turning" a kid homosexual. Most the population could never, ever choose to be gay if they were paid to do so. But being convinced fornication is perfectly ok is very easy to do. What about eating, or drinking alcohol to the point of gluttony? Very easy to convince someone that is ok to do.

Do we see threads saying single people who are living with a heterosexual partner should not be around children? Do we see threads on someone who drinks or eats to excess frequently should not be around children? From what I have seen it is only a tiny subset of folks people worry about. If people want to protect the kids from being lead astray, pick the most likely candidates, not the least likely.
If you really want to see a thread on those topics, you're welcome to start them.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: hislegacy
Upvote 0

Larniavc

Leading a blameless life
Jul 14, 2015
12,340
7,678
51
✟314,659.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,231
61
Columbus
✟81,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.