Say it aint so
Well-Known Member
- Jun 19, 2020
- 1,560
- 1,525
- 26
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
You must be new to American politics.one of the largest scandals in the history of American politics.
Upvote
0
You must be new to American politics.one of the largest scandals in the history of American politics.
The writer of that article either isn't very bright or assumes is audience is super gullible:The implications of these developments are enormous and while there is still much to be learned, it is possible investigators are on the cusp of revealing one of the largest scandals in the history of American politics.
The probers believe the president participated in and profited from the corrupt influence-peddling schemes while he was vice president.
Bidens’ corrupt web unraveling before our eyes
It is said that history turns on small hinges, with the poem “For Want of a Nail” the classic example.nypost.com
The enemies of Joe Biden have had the "laptop" since 2019. How much time does it take?The implications of the evidence. The committee is in the process of gathering evidence. Like Watergate, the process takes time.
By your logic, Trump must have been guilty, given the comments by some Democratic politicians. It doesn't matter which party the politicians making the claims belong to, the fact is that both sides make "worst case" claims that they can't support -- and then never apologize after they can't prove the claims they made.The implications of these developments are enormous and while there is still much to be learned, it is possible investigators are on the cusp of revealing one of the largest scandals in the history of American politics.
The probers believe the president participated in and profited from the corrupt influence-peddling schemes while he was vice president.
Bidens’ corrupt web unraveling before our eyes
It is said that history turns on small hinges, with the poem “For Want of a Nail” the classic example.nypost.com
Going to go out on a limb, etc.“Well right now we have nine but I believe in the end that number will be at least 12,” Comer revealed. “This was the Biden family influence peddling scheme. When people say ‘Well they were involved in ventures around the world.’ I haven’t found a legitimate business on the Biden end, Maria.”
What did the Bidens do to earn the money from the Chinese?WATCH: Republican James Comer Shares New Revelations About The Biden Crime Family – ‘It’s The Entire Family’
On Sunday, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) joined Maria Bartiromo on Fox News’s ‘Sunday Morning Fut...dcenquirer.com
Same could be asked of the Kennedys or Trumps.
This sounds like envy.
What investment work did Hunter and his family do for the Chinese? How much did the Chinese profit from this investment work? I would think one would be curious to know the answer to what those that lavished money upon the Bidens actually got back in return for their investment. The only reason I can think of for not being curious at all would be some ideological blindness that does not allow one to doubt the absolute purity of every single person that has expressed ideological agreement with one.May I suggest rather than saying things, actually test what you say is true. It may be true the age old benefit that exists around the world of one's last name makes a difference from business deals to getting into college, but that is not a crime. Moreover, the consulting firm in which he was a part of did investment work.
What investment work did Hunter and his family do for the Chinese? How much did the Chinese profit from this investment work? I would think one would be curious to know the answer to what those that lavished money upon the Bidens actually got back in return for their investment. The only reason I can think of for not being curious at all would be some ideological blindness that does not allow one to doubt the absolute purity of every single person that has expressed ideological agreement with one.
Certainly the Justice Department has had the laptop for years, and it is an outrage that they have covered up crimes. For example, there is no doubt Hunter lied on his gun application. Despite the media covering up for the Bidens, more people are slowly beginning to realize Hunter is being given protection from the law because of his dad. The Justice Department may eventually bow to public pressure and prosecute Hunter on the gun charge and cut some kind of deal. But the big guy is who is getting the most protection from the Justice Department. It seems clear Joe has lied about not discussing any of Hunter's business dealings, the records show Joe has had personal contact with many of Hunter's business partners. The House of Representatives is doing what the Justice Department should have done in regard to roughly 250 suspicious flagged financial transactions of Hunter. They have discovered shell corporations which appear to be conduits for the money coming into the Bidens. We now know at least a dozen of the Bidens or relatives of the Bidens have received foreign money.The writer of that article either isn't very bright or assumes is audience is super gullible:
Linking the letter to the Biden campaign is significant because the president himself had to know the laptop was legitimate because the information on it included photos of him and messages and meetings.
His argument is that Joe Biden had to know the "laptop" was real because some pictures on it were real?
The enemies of Joe Biden have had the "laptop" since 2019. How much time does it take?
In what way has the DOJ, whether under Trump or Hunter's Dad, has been covering up crimes? If lying about drug use on a gun permit is this "crime" you are going to be sorely disappointed. As I noted, in the state this is being conducted, Delaware, they don't have a history of charging people of that. The anomaly would be if they did. You describe other "Joe knew this guy" stuff you assume to be true, but none of it describe crimes.Certainly the Justice Department has had the laptop for years, and it is an outrage that they have covered up crimes. For example, there is no doubt Hunter lied on his gun application. Despite the media covering up for the Bidens, more people are slowly beginning to realize Hunter is being given protection from the law because of his dad. The Justice Department may eventually bow to public pressure and prosecute Hunter on the gun charge and cut some kind of deal. But the big guy is who is getting the most protection from the Justice Department. It seems clear Joe has lied about not discussing any of Hunter's business dealings, the records show Joe has had personal contact with many of Hunter's business partners. The House of Representatives is doing what the Justice Department should have done in regard to roughly 250 suspicious flagged financial transactions of Hunter. They have discovered shell corporations which appear to be conduits for the money coming into the Bidens. We now know at least a dozen of the Bidens or relatives of the Bidens have received foreign money.
As to Hunter, here is what NBC news said I few days ago about the federal charges:In what way has the DOJ, whether under Trump or Hunter's Dad, has been covering up crimes? If lying about drug use on a gun permit is this "crime" you are going to be sorely disappointed. As I noted, in the state this is being conducted, Delaware, they don't have a history of charging people of that. The anomaly would be if they did. You describe other "Joe knew this guy" stuff you assume to be true, but none of it describe crimes.
Yes. Not new revelations. That has been known since Oct 2022. The WaPo:As to Hunter, here is what NBC news said I few days ago about the federal charges:
Federal prosecutors have considered four charges against Hunter Biden
Possible charges are two misdemeanor counts for failure to file taxes, a single felony count of tax evasion and a felony count related to a gun purchase.www.nbcnews.com
It seems like an illegal gun purchase is a huge deal for those on the left unless it involves one of their own:
Delaware attorney general announces felony gun purchase arrests - Bay to Bay News
DOVER — Let the buyer beware, Dover Police Chief Thomas Johnson stressed Wednesday. The chief cautioned against purchasing a gun for someone prohibited from possessing one. Chief …baytobaynews.com
Must have all been Democrats! Does everyone who commits a felony of not paying taxes also avoid prosecution?Yes. Not new revelations. That has been known since Oct 2022. The WaPo:
Don't think Hunter was doing straw gun purchases. In Delaware there were 3 of 4 people who did the same as Hunter come the gun registration, none of them were prosecuted.
"Federal agents see chargeable tax, gun-purchase case against Hunter Biden"
No, lots of people who don't pay taxes are never actually charged. To quote from debt.org, "Can you go to jail? Yes. Will you go to jail for back taxes? That answer isn’t so clear." They explain that, when contacted by the IRS that if you are willing to pay what you owe that you likely can avoid jail, even stating, "For the most part, people who are unable to pay a tax bill, but are willing to work with the government to resolve the issue, are not headed to jail. There are several steps between missing a tax payment and jail, and each of those steps includes an opportunity to resolve your tax problems without facing incarceration."Must have all been Democrats! Does everyone who commits a felony of not paying taxes also avoid prosecution?
There are plenty of people of all stripes who have been prosecuted. Most of the time it depends on the amount, and whether it's knowingly and if that person is a habitual offender. Take for example the actor Wesley Snipes and his sovereign citizen nonsense, or Trump's COO of the Trump criminal organization who was just released from jail. That org was knowingly, and habitual.Must have all been Democrats! Does everyone who commits a felony of not paying taxes also avoid prosecution?
So why is prosecuting Hunter for a felony on tax evasion so off the table?There are plenty of people of all stripes who have been prosecuted. Most of the time it depends on the amount, and whether it's knowingly and if that person is a habitual offender. Take for example the actor Wesley Snipes and his sovereign citizen nonsense, or Trump's COO of the Trump criminal organization who was just released from jail. That org was knowingly, and habitual.
They'll get to it just as soon as the questions about Obama's birth certificate are finally sorted out.The enemies of Joe Biden have had the "laptop" since 2019. How much time does it take?
I don't think it is off the table. But again, if for example he was knowingly doing what sent Trump's COO, he could be prosecuted.So why is prosecuting Hunter for a felony on tax evasion so off the table?
I see. Implications. Assertions. Assumptions. But we don't know, yet it means absolute influence peddling. Got it.