Col 2:16 is about not judging others

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Gal 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.

Gal 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.

Gal 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.





Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

Gal 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.


You do realize that we are dead nevertheless we live. Yet not us but Christ lives in us and the life we now live in the flesh we live by the faith of the Son of God who gave himself for us means that we have become that which we beheld. The Law, God's Word being in our hearts through Christ through His Spirit. Us being a New Creation in Christ Jesus. We no longer obey because we have to but because we want to because of who we are in Him. It is to be an age of sinlessness. But alas we like the Book and being under it don't we?
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The term "under the LAW" in Gal 4 -- in its most favorable light - means under the obligation of the ceremonial law apart from faith. But in general Paul uses the term with respect to condemnation under the moral of God without the Gospel benefit of salvation.

.
Hi Ryan! What gave you that idea? Galatians Speaks of the Law in it's entirety not just the ceremonial. If we are dead nevertheless we live. Yet not us but Christ Lives in us and the life we now live in the flesh is by the Faith OF the Son of God who gave himself for us. We are a new creature of the same Spirit for the Law, the Word now part of us. For He was to be the first among many brethren. No longer being told what to do by an external source. For we are a new creation in Christ Jesus living by God's Spirit and not by the Schoolmaster, the Book of the Law.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You do realize that we are dead nevertheless we live. Yet not us but Christ lives in us and the life we now live in the flesh we live by the faith of the Son of God who gave himself for us means that we have become that which we beheld. The Law, God's Word being in our hearts through Christ through His Spirit. Us being a New Creation in Christ Jesus. We no longer obey because we have to but because we want to because of who we are in Him. It is to be an age of sinlessness. But alas we like the Book and being under it don't we?

Yes.

I also realize the battle between the New Covenant and the Old Covenant began in Acts chapter 15 and continues to this day.

We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.

.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,352
10,607
Georgia
✟911,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Yes.
I also realize the battle between the New Covenant and the Old Covenant began in Acts chapter 15
.

Not true.

The Old Covenant is what we see in Rom 3:19-21 reminding us that the Law of God condemns all the world to this very day - just as it did condemn Adam and Eve - as sinners for "all have sinned". This reveals that all need a Savior not "just the gentiles".

The New Covenant - as we see it in Jer 31:31-34 (and in Heb 8:6-12) pointed out that the "LAW of God is written on the heart and mind" for the born-again believer. This is the only way that Moses and Elijah stand in glory with Christ in Matt 17 before the cross even happens.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,352
10,607
Georgia
✟911,857.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Hi Ryan! What gave you that idea? Galatians Speaks of the Law in it's entirety not just the ceremonial. If we are dead nevertheless we live.

Well in the sense you are using it "we were dead in trespasses and sins" it is not a reference to the ceremonial law at all - only the moral law has mankind dead in trespasses and sin. So in that context being "under the Law" as in Rom 3:19-21 means to be under the condemnation of the Law. Where all have sinned and all need salvation.

Which is the use of it I am stating here

BobRyan said:
in general Paul uses the term with respect to condemnation under the moral of God without the Gospel benefit of salvation.

I am looking up the context for this next one - might be a typo on my part.

BobRyan said:
The term "under the LAW" in Gal 4 -- in its most favorable light - means under the obligation of the ceremonial law apart from faith.

==================== here is the full context for that statement

Gal 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.

Gal 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

And I said of Gal 4:24-25
The term "under the LAW" in Gal 4 -- in its most favorable light - means under the obligation of the ceremonial law apart from faith.​

Paul is speaking of unsaved Jews (by contrast to the saved Jews of which all the Apostles are examples).

The unsaved Jew was under the Law both moral and ceremonial. Even saved Jews were free to observe the feast days as we see in Rom 14 and in the sense that even Paul was still observing things like feast of unleavened bread and taking vows in the temple. The unsaved Jew at that time was not aware of Christ as the Messiah that had died for their sins so for them it was "no change at all" from a time 100 years prior -- nothing had changed. So then they did not accept Christ and they were still following all the same liturgy of the nation church setup by God at Sinai.

Paul says this in Heb 10
11 Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; 12 but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God, 13 waiting from that time onward until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet. 14 For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. 15 And the Holy Spirit also testifies to us; for after saying,
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not true.

The Old Covenant is what we see in Rom 3:19-21 reminding us that the Law of God condemns all the world to this very day - just as it did condemn Adam and Eve - as sinners for "all have sinned". This reveals that all need a Savior not "just the gentiles".

The New Covenant - as we see it in Jer 31:31-34 (and in Heb 8:6-12) pointed out that the "LAW of God is written on the heart and mind" for the born-again believer. This is the only way that Moses and Elijah stand in glory with Christ in Matt 17 before the cross even happens.


Act 15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:


.
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Happy Sabbath brother!
Hi Ryan! What gave you that idea? Galatians Speaks of the Law in it's entirety not just the ceremonial. If we are dead nevertheless we live. Yet not us but Christ Lives in us and the life we now live in the flesh is by the Faith OF the Son of God who gave himself for us. We are a new creature of the same Spirit for the Law, the Word now part of us. For He was to be the first among many brethren. No longer being told what to do by an external source. For we are a new creation in Christ Jesus living by God's Spirit and not by the Schoolmaster, the Book of the Law.
Well in the sense you are using it "we were dead in trespasses and sins" it is not a reference to the ceremonial law at all - only the moral law has mankind dead in trespasses and sin. So in that context being "under the Law" as in Rom 3:19-21 means to be under the condemnation of the Law. Where all have sinned and all need salvation.
Where does it say "were dead in trespasses and sins" in Galatians in respect to 2:20? And Romans 3 does not say under the Law it says in the law or by the law. Look at the Greek.


And I said of Gal 4:24-25
The term "under the LAW" in Gal 4 -- in its most favorable light - means under the obligation of the ceremonial law apart from faith.​
Here in chapter 3 of Galatians is the first time the phrase "under the law" is used. If we take into account the grammar a reason is given that explains what the phrase "under the law" means in the very next verse. Verse 24 starts with the word "therefore". It says the Law was our schoolmaster, our tutor, our teacher. And this is said in context to the law being said that it was added because of transgressions in verse 19. So that means the Law which is our teacher told us what sin is and what to do about it. And more importantly God's will. This point is even further emphasized in verse 10 where it states, "cursed is everyone that continues not in ALL things written in the Book of the Law to do them" ALL things means just that. Ceremonial and Moral laws not just the ceremonial. Then in verse 25 it states that after THE Faith has came we are no longer under the Law in respect to it being our schoolmaster, our teacher to let us know what sin is, God's will for our lives. So what is "THE FAITH" that has come that took the place of us being under the schoolmaster, the law that was ADDED because of our transgressions.




Gal 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.


Gal 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Gal 3:23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
Gal 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Gal 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Paul is speaking of unsaved Jews (by contrast to the saved Jews of which all the Apostles are examples).

The unsaved Jew was under the Law both moral and ceremonial. Even saved Jews were free to observe the feast days as we see in Rom 14 and in the sense that even Paul was still observing things like feast of unleavened bread and taking vows in the temple. The unsaved Jew at that time was not aware of Christ as the Messiah that had died for their sins so for them it was "no change at all" from a time 100 years prior -- nothing had changed. So then they did not accept Christ and they were still following all the same liturgy of the nation church setup by God at Sinai.
Romans 14 is not speaking of the Book of the Law. It is about subjective opinions.

How do we know. Outside of the fact verse one states just that. Nowhere is it even implied that one must only eat herbs in the Book of the Law or that one can eat everything.

(Rom 14:1,2 NET) Now receive the one who is weak in the faith, and do not have disputes over differing opinions.
One person believes in eating everything, but the weak person eats only vegetables.

(Rom 14:1,2 TS2009) And receive him who is weak in the belief, not criticising his thoughts.
One indeed believes to eat all food, but he who is weak eats only vegetables.


Paul says this in Heb 10
11 Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; 12 but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God, 13 waiting from that time onward until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet. 14 For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. 15 And the Holy Spirit also testifies to us; for after saying,
Amen! After repeating the New Covenant, that God's Law are in our hearts and minds in chapter 8. Which include the Ten and the other Morals contained in the Book of the Law. God goes on to show the what and why the ceremonial and sacrificial Laws pertaining to the Tabernacle and it's service are not included in hearts in chapter 9 and 10.
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
IN CONTEXT

Colossians 2:8-17
8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. 9 For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily; 10 and you are complete in Him, who is the head of all principality and power.


11 In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead. 13 And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, 14 having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. 15 Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it.

16 So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, 17 which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.


Are the commands of God philosophy or empty deceit?
Are the commands of God tradition of men, basic principles of the world?
Are the commands of God not according to Christ?


It is extremely clear the issue in Colossians is, Paul is talking to new converts to the faith that used to be pagans and are now following Christ, so in their pagan society he is telling them NOT to let anyone judge them for keeping the commands of God like new moons, the Sabbath or Feast Days. They are all a shadow of what is to come in Christ.

HE IS NOT saying dont let anyone judge you for breaking the commands of God, like many on here are teaching.
Verse 8 and 16 are talking about two different issues. Tradition and vain things of men and the ceremonial laws contained in the Book of the Law which are a shadow of things to come, but the Body is Christ
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Gal 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.

Gal 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.

Gal 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.





Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

Gal 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
You do realize that we are dead nevertheless we live. Yet not us but Christ lives in us and the life we now live in the flesh we live by the faith of the Son of God who gave himself for us means that we have become that which we beheld. The Law, God's Word being in our hearts through Christ through His Spirit. Us being a New Creation in Christ Jesus. We no longer obey because we have to but because we want to because of who we are in Him. It is to be an age of sinlessness. But alas we like the Book and being under it don't we?
Yes.

I also realize the battle between the New Covenant and the Old Covenant began in Acts chapter 15 and continues to this day.

We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.

.
Galatians not Acts or Hebrews.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Galatians not Acts or Hebrews.

Act 15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:

.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
4,852
1,027
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟112,880.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Act 15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:

.

What a difference a manuscript family can make:

Acts 15:24 ASV
24 Forasmuch as we have heard that certain who went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls; to whom we gave no commandment;

This therefore is a disputed verse and the only possibility for resolving it would be to engage in textual criticism, (which is not like an exact science to begin with). "Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law" only occurs in the Byzantine family of manuscripts and texts.
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Act 15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:

.
So now you wish to move to Acts because you don't actually have an argument against what was shown to you in Galatians and you concede? Why not repent and recant?
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What a difference a manuscript family can make:

Acts 15:24 ASV
24 Forasmuch as we have heard that certain who went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls; to whom we gave no commandment;

This therefore is a disputed verse and the only possibility for resolving it would be to engage in textual criticism, (which is not like an exact science to begin with). "Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law" only occurs in the Byzantine family of manuscripts and texts.
The Alexandrian text was non existent until 1800's. So until then we had not the truth and God had us in darkness? That is what you are saying, right?
 
Upvote 0

Bob S

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 5, 2015
4,598
2,211
88
Union County, TN
✟662,205.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Rev 12 we see the work of the "Accuser of the brethren".
In Matt 7 (pre-cross -- and law in full effect) Christ condemns judging others.

In Col 2:16 we have this -
Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of sabbath days:
Col 2:17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

An example of NOT condemning eating OR drinking or remembering God's Ten-Commandment creation-Sabbath day to keep it holy. Rather Col 2 condemns the "commandments of men" - (as is so carefully avoided in the quotes we often see from Col 2)

Col 2 is 0pposed to making up a rule and judging others of being guilty of sin because they differ with you, even if that invented rule is related to a Bible command. - so it is opposed to 'making stuff up' - via "man-made tradition"

As is Christ against it --

GOD speaks for God and HE already spoke to this point of changing His Law via church tradition. As we see in Mark 7:6-13

Mark 7

7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the Commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
13 Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.


That is a case of Christ demonstrating the way that the magisterium is hammered "sola scriptura" in the cases where it is shown via "Sola Scriptura" testing that it is traditions and "doctrines of men" that are at odds with scripture

so on this same thread ...


You can't be serious.

Perhaps a short "summary" to refresh short term memory.
=============================================
=============================================

Comments on this same thread...



Do you say that as the "Accuser of the brethren" in Rev 12 - or do you have some "other source"??









And then of course we have "you".





And we all would agree to this -- the rebellious child could easily say to his/her parents "first you must be perfect then you may tell me to Honor my Father and Mother as God instructed in the Bible" -- but of course -- that is "old news"
After serving my time in the SDA church (40 years) I know a little bit whole lot about what they believe. One of the series of books published by the church is called the Testimonies. In those nine volumes are full of the most judgmental writings I have ever read. The SDA prophet has most all people, since 1844, doomed to Hell because we know there was a Sabbath that was given to the Israelites and we don't observe it. The writings of said prophet are deemed as being canon or equal to scripture.

What your church is doing is real judging Bob. Refuting those claims is not judging. No one tis telling you that you are going to Hell for keeping the Sabbath.
And when those who claim the rest of us have to observe the Sabath and quote "keep the commandments of God" try to relate that to keeping the ten commandments, we know something is fishy. Nowhere does it tell us it is the ten commandments. That is only an opinion. Adam had commands, Noah had commands, the Israelites had 613 commands. Christians have commands and the greatest command we have is loving others as Jesus loves us and loving God with all our hearts. How is it your church can judge others for keeping the commands Jesus gave us in His new covenant??
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Happy Sabbath brother!

Hi Ryan! What gave you that idea? Galatians Speaks of the Law in it's entirety not just the ceremonial. If we are dead nevertheless we live. Yet not us but Christ Lives in us and the life we now live in the flesh is by the Faith OF the Son of God who gave himself for us. We are a new creature of the same Spirit for the Law, the Word now part of us. For He was to be the first among many brethren. No longer being told what to do by an external source. For we are a new creation in Christ Jesus living by God's Spirit and not by the Schoolmaster, the Book of the Law.

Well in the sense you are using it "we were dead in trespasses and sins" it is not a reference to the ceremonial law at all - only the moral law has mankind dead in trespasses and sin. So in that context being "under the Law" as in Rom 3:19-21 means to be under the condemnation of the Law. Where all have sinned and all need salvation.

Where does it say "were dead in trespasses and sins" in Galatians in respect to 2:20? And Romans 3 does not say under the Law it says in the law or by the law. Look at the Greek.


Romans 14 is not speaking of the Book of the Law. It is about subjective opinions.

How do we know. Outside of the fact verse one states just that. Nowhere is it even implied that one must only eat herbs in the Book of the Law or that one can eat everything.

(Rom 14:1,2 NET) Now receive the one who is weak in the faith, and do not have disputes over differing opinions.
One person believes in eating everything, but the weak person eats only vegetables.

(Rom 14:1,2 TS2009) And receive him who is weak in the belief, not criticising his thoughts.
One indeed believes to eat all food, but he who is weak eats only vegetables.


Paul says this in Heb 10
11 Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; 12 but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God, 13 waiting from that time onward until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet. 14 For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. 15 And the Holy Spirit also testifies to us; for after saying,
Amen! After repeating the New Covenant, that God's Law are in our hearts and minds in chapter 8. Which include the Ten and the other Morals contained in the Book of the Law. God goes on to show the what and why the ceremonial and sacrificial Laws pertaining to the Tabernacle and it's service are not included in hearts in chapter 9 and 10.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
4,852
1,027
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟112,880.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The Alexandrian text was non existent until 1800's. So until then we had not the truth and God had us in darkness? That is what you are saying, right?

Are you aware that Koine Greek was lost to the world for some time? Are you aware that when the KJV was first translated they did not even realize they were translating Koine Greek? Who is credited with the discovery that the N/T is written in Koine Greek? I do not remember his name off the top of my head but it was after the 1611 KJV by at least a hundred years if my memory serves me correctly.

As for darkness, no, I myself can read that text and see what was inserted because of context, understanding, and the contradiction(s) created by the addition. As for anyone else, I cannot speak, but let each be taught of Elohim and not of man.
 
Upvote 0

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
4,852
1,027
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟112,880.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The Alexandrian text was non existent until 1800's. So until then we had not the truth and God had us in darkness? That is what you are saying, right?
Are you aware that Koine Greek was lost to the world for some time? Are you aware that when the KJV was first translated they did not even realize they were translating Koine Greek? Who is credited with the discovery that the N/T is written in Koine Greek? I do not remember his name off the top of my head but it was after the 1611 KJV by at least a hundred years if my memory serves me correctly.

As for darkness, no, I myself can read that text and see what was inserted because of context, understanding, and the contradiction(s) created by the addition. As for anyone else, I cannot speak, but let each be taught of Elohim and not of man.

The systemic antinomian bias in the Byzantine/TR textual tradition begins to become rather apparent with a serious open-minded study of the following passages in their contexts.

Matthew 26:28, Mark 14:24, Luke 22:20 (1Cor 11:25), Acts 15:24, Acts 21:25, (many more).
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
8,170
2,197
54
Northeast
✟180,783.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The systemic antinomian bias in the Byzantine/TR textual tradition begins to become rather apparent with a serious open-minded study of the following passages in their contexts.

Matthew 26:28, Mark 14:24, Luke 22:20 (1Cor 11:25), Acts 15:24, Acts 21:25, (many more).
God hasn't given us an exact copy of the scriptures? I agree.

That leads me to believe that the important thing is to look for general themes in the scriptures. Also, check to see what the early church thought the New Testament meant, since they were really close to it and often native speakers, etc.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: daq
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
4,534
926
America
Visit site
✟267,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Happy Sabbath brother!



Where does it say "were dead in trespasses and sins" in Galatians in respect to 2:20? And Romans 3 does not say under the Law it says in the law or by the law. Look at the Greek.


Romans 14 is not speaking of the Book of the Law. It is about subjective opinions.

How do we know. Outside of the fact verse one states just that. Nowhere is it even implied that one must only eat herbs in the Book of the Law or that one can eat everything.

(Rom 14:1,2 NET) Now receive the one who is weak in the faith, and do not have disputes over differing opinions.
One person believes in eating everything, but the weak person eats only vegetables.

(Rom 14:1,2 TS2009) And receive him who is weak in the belief, not criticising his thoughts.
One indeed believes to eat all food, but he who is weak eats only vegetables.



Amen! After repeating the New Covenant, that God's Law are in our hearts and minds in chapter 8. Which include the Ten and the other Morals contained in the Book of the Law. God goes on to show the what and why the ceremonial and sacrificial Laws pertaining to the Tabernacle and it's service are not included in hearts in chapter 9 and 10.

The perfect will of Yahweh, which few look for, to change what they would need to for that, is shown in Genesis 1, with really including verse 29 with it. Changes in scriptures from what is stated earliest are for concessions to those with hardened hearts in this fallen condition with our world. Yahweh will not leave it all this way, the restoration toward that is shown with promise in prophecies revealed from Yahweh to us, which can include us with our repentant faith being in Christ.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

HIM

Friend
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
3,985
1,749
58
Alabama
Visit site
✟375,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The perfect will of Yahweh, which few look for, to change what they would need to for that, is shown in Genesis 1, with really including verse 29 with it.

Gen 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

Changes in scriptures from what is stated earliest are for concessions to those with hardened hearts in this fallen condition with our world.

What changes?
Yahweh will not leave it all this way, the restoration toward that is shown with promise in prophecies revealed from Yahweh to us, which can include us with our repentant faith being in Christ.
Amen!
 
Upvote 0