- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,202
- 518
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
I typed into a website and found criticism of it by some who said it was NAR, and NAR was new to me. I had to look it up. I never read any of C P Wagner works. I also judge not to agree with the end times transfer of wealth from the unrighteous to the just... I hold to Bible promises. I want the life of blessings.
I think the old witch hunter and thirty years war type of people look for reasons to infight, using NAR currently. Some prayers we all pray are now considered NAR and the infighters want them cancelled. Like "Dear God, give us government with faith and Christian values." These prayers are ancient. Even going back to Constantine.
Wouldn't it be great if China became a Christian country? I think it unfair that a person can be labelled NAR. It is a theological movement and has no members. It based on Wagner's observations of dynamic expanding churches across the world back in 1988... and so if he got it askew, it is not fair for them to be labelled and cancelled by his mistake... we need church expansion, it is God's Kingdom will, His commission. Lives depend on it. I don't think NAR is all wrong, but partly so it needs sorting.
From Wikipedia, what is right or wrong with this? How can we bless churches that expand while not erring in our ways? How can we deal with the jealous and otherwise motivated infighters? New Apostolic Reformation Description
I think the old witch hunter and thirty years war type of people look for reasons to infight, using NAR currently. Some prayers we all pray are now considered NAR and the infighters want them cancelled. Like "Dear God, give us government with faith and Christian values." These prayers are ancient. Even going back to Constantine.
Wouldn't it be great if China became a Christian country? I think it unfair that a person can be labelled NAR. It is a theological movement and has no members. It based on Wagner's observations of dynamic expanding churches across the world back in 1988... and so if he got it askew, it is not fair for them to be labelled and cancelled by his mistake... we need church expansion, it is God's Kingdom will, His commission. Lives depend on it. I don't think NAR is all wrong, but partly so it needs sorting.
From Wikipedia, what is right or wrong with this? How can we bless churches that expand while not erring in our ways? How can we deal with the jealous and otherwise motivated infighters? New Apostolic Reformation Description