Spin the leftist labels however you like,
I prefer that words be used accurately and comporting with their actual definition. I guess other's don't agree.
but each and every member of the J6 show voiced nothing but hatred of Trump and conservatives,
Histrionic fan fiction worthy of little more than a derisive eye roll. The Hearing witnesses were mostly members of Donald's regime and even his own family. If the tone of the hearings was "nothing but hatred" of Donald and conservatives, what does that tell you about him and those who know him best?
and the product they displayed as "evidence" was edited to suit the narrative they were pushing.
Again, the gaslighting is infinitely more hilarious than it is effective. Your ostensible reason for thinking this, other than an irrational devotion to Donald, is 4 minutes of heavily edited and narrated video presented by an ADMITTED liar and propagandist.
I'm gifting this WaPo article to anyone who wants to read it.
Internally he calls Dominion claims nonsense. On air he feeds the narrative.
Carlson texts producer Alex Pfeiffer: “The software (stuff) is absurd. … Half our viewers have seen the Maria clip.”
Later on his show, Carlson says, “We don’t know how many votes were stolen on Tuesday night. We don’t know anything about the software that many say was rigged. We don’t know. We ought to find out.”
He's more worried about the stock price than actual facts.
After Fox reporter Jacqui Heinrich fact-checks a Trump tweet mentioning Fox’s coverage, Carlson texts, “Please get her fired. Seriously. … It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It’s measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke.”
Internally he admits Donald should concede and what a toxic effect he has on politics.
Someone texts Carlson, “Trump needs to concede. There wasn’t enough fraud to change the outcome. He’s [starting] to do real damage to the party.” Carlson responds: “That’s for sure. He’s only good at destroying.”
Carlson and Ingraham don't like the angertainment folks being fact checked by the news folks.
Carlson complains about Fox’s PR team allegedly promoting a host’s fact check debunking claims like those made on Bartiromo’s show. Host Laura Ingraham says, “We are all officially working for an organization that hates us. … The people of news.” Ingraham adds: “My anger at the news channel is pronounced.”
Separately, Carlson texts someone, “Sidney Powell is lying.”
Internally he called out Sidney Powell for not having any evidence.
Carlson texts Powell, saying: “You keep telling our viewers that millions of votes were changed by the software. … If you don’t have conclusive evidence of fraud at that scale, it’s a cruel and reckless thing to keep saying.”
Internally Ingraham and Carlson call her crazy and say she's grifting, but they keep putting her on the air.
Also internally, Ingraham calls Powell “a complete nut” and says: “No one will work with her. Ditto with Rudy.” Carlson responds: “It’s unbelievably offensive to me. Our viewers are good people and they believe it. … She’s soliciting ‘millions of dollars’ in checks made out to her personally.”
Producers decide not to push back on Powell's claims after input from Carlson.
Shah and Pfeiffer converse about what to do with Powell’s claims and ultimately decide, with input from Carlson, not to belabor or push back on them.
And finally, on January 4th, Carlson says he's had enough of Donald and the destruction he's wrought on conservatives and the Republican party.
Carlson says internally: “We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. … I truly can’t wait.” He adds, “I hate him passionately,” and then, of Trump’s four years in office: “We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest. But come on. There really isn’t an upside to Trump.”
Looks like you're coming around to accepting the idea that this really was a show trial.
Sounds like your imagination is leading you to conclude things that don't comport with reality.
www.axios.com
