A Necessity - 4 Marian Doctrines

concretecamper

Member of His Church
Nov 23, 2013
6,776
2,568
PA
✟274,088.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You are trying to imply our understanding of the Trinity only comes from the teaching and traditions of the RC church and thus outside of Scripture. Sorry, not buying it.
I'm not implying, I'm am absolutely stating that protestant belief about the Trinity is taken from His Church and His Church's teachings not found in scripture. So far, no one has been able to prove otherwise.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,104.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I'm not implying, I'm am absolutely stating that protestant belief about the Trinity is taken from His Church and His Church's teachings not found in scripture. So far, no one has been able to prove otherwise.
Whose voice said, "This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased" while Jesus was being baptised by John? And what was the bodily form who descended on Jesus?
 
Upvote 0

NotUrAvgGuy

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
935
397
Boise, Idaho
Visit site
✟66,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'm not implying, I'm am absolutely stating that protestant belief about the Trinity is taken from His Church and His Church's teachings not found in scripture. So far, no one has been able to prove otherwise.
We are not interested in satisfying you. We believe otherwise. It's all there in the Scriptures. Besides, "His Church" didn't even resemble the RC church when these things were first discussed. Not that I agree the RC church is "His Church."
 
Upvote 0

concretecamper

Member of His Church
Nov 23, 2013
6,776
2,568
PA
✟274,088.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We are not interested in satisfying you. We believe otherwise. It's all there in the Scriptures. Besides, "His Church" didn't even resemble the RC church when these things were first discussed. Not that I agree the RC church is "His Church."
Whose voice said, "This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased" while Jesus was being baptised by John? And what was the bodily form who descended on Jesus?
as asked prior and never answered, then explain these facts about the Trinity using only Scripture.

1. That the Father, Son and holy Spirit have one nature or substance.
2. That They have one power and authority.
3. That there is a consubstantial Trinity, one Deity to be adored in three subsistences or persons

So far we have the Baptism at the Jordan proposed, but that does not come close to explaining these 3 facts about the Trinity.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,585
731
56
Ohio US
✟149,917.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
His Church
Not to change the subject but just jumping in to say that one can never forget the veil was rent from top to bottom.

Any church that does not promote the fact that we can "boldy" go to the Father/throne in Christ's name is not "his true church".

God will choose whomever to make sure his will is done. But any time we veer off course of the scriptures something is wrong.

The one true church is the one that the disciples and the apostles started. Again, if anything contradicts what they taught then they can no longer be called "his church". Anything that's been added that's a contradiction to the word is simply men's tradition.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,104.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
as asked prior and never answered, then explain these facts about the Trinity using only Scripture.

1. That the Father, Son and holy Spirit have one nature or substance.
2. That They have one power and authority.
3. That there is a consubstantial Trinity, one Deity to be adored in three subsistences or persons

So far we have the Baptism at the Jordan proposed, but that does not come close to explaining these 3 facts about the Trinity.
You're entitled to your own opinion, so I won't argue with you about it. I just abide by the Westminster Confession of Faith, and that is good enough for me, even though it doesn't appear good enough for you. No problem.
 
Upvote 0

concretecamper

Member of His Church
Nov 23, 2013
6,776
2,568
PA
✟274,088.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not to change the subject but just jumping in to say that one can never forget the veil was rent from top to bottom.

Any church that does not promote the fact that we can "boldy" go to the Father/throne in Christ's name is not "his true church".

God will choose whomever to make sure his will is done. But any time we veer off course of the scriptures something is wrong.

The one true church is the one that the disciples and the apostles started. Again, if anything contradicts what they taught then they can no longer be called "his church". Anything that's been added that's a contradiction to the word is simply men's tradition.
I'm sure you know what you meant to cover on this post.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,549
12,099
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,178,020.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Not to change the subject but just jumping in to say that one can never forget the veil was rent from top to bottom.

Any church that does not promote the fact that we can "boldy" go to the Father/throne in Christ's name is not "his true church".

God will choose whomever to make sure his will is done. But any time we veer off course of the scriptures something is wrong.

The one true church is the one that the disciples and the apostles started. Again, if anything contradicts what they taught then they can no longer be called "his church". Anything that's been added that's a contradiction to the word is simply men's tradition.
Sure, but many of us are deeply aware of our unworthiness. The Apostle Paul considered himself the worst of sinners and that humility is a true mark of becoming Christ like. For example, there are those who say that "The Lord's Prayer" was given to us just as an example, but who are we to think that we can improve on the words of our Lord.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,585
731
56
Ohio US
✟149,917.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sure, but many of us are deeply aware of our unworthiness
Yes, but that's why these verse resonate even more that we can approach the throne needing no one else but Christ.

Hebrews 4:14 "Seeing then that we have a great High Priest, That is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession."

Hebrews 4:15 "For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."


Christ is not a High Priest that cannot be touched with the feelings of our sin because he knows how we feel in the flesh.

Hebrews 4:16 "Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need."

So if we teach anything that contradicts these very verses that says we should go to Mary or a Saint with the belief that they have more influence with Christ than us being able to just go to the Father in Christ's name, that's going against the very meaning of the veil being torn from top to the bottom to the Holy of Holies. That's why Christ died so we can go straight in and be that atonement for one and all time.

Ephesians 2:18 "For through Him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris V++
Upvote 0

NotUrAvgGuy

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
935
397
Boise, Idaho
Visit site
✟66,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Yes, but that's why these verse resonate even more that we can approach the throne needing no one else but Christ.

Hebrews 4:14 "Seeing then that we have a great High Priest, That is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession."

Hebrews 4:15 "For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."


Christ is not a High Priest that cannot be touched with the feelings of our sin because he knows how we feel in the flesh.

Hebrews 4:16 "Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need."

So if we teach anything that contradicts these very verses that says we should go to Mary or a Saint with the belief that they have more influence with Christ than us being able to just go to the Father in Christ's name, that's going against the very meaning of the veil being torn from top to the bottom to the Holy of Holies. That's why Christ died so we can go straight in and be that atonement for one and all time.

Ephesians 2:18 "For through Him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father."
Not to mention, we are forbidden from attempting to communicate with the dead which includes Mary and the so-called saints. There is one mediator between God and man and that is Jesus. On earth, we might get a friend to put in a good word for us with someone we are reluctant to approach on our own. We hope their good standing with that person might benefit us especially if we are unknown or little known to that person. God knows us, inside and out. We don't need an "in" with God. We also cannot ask the dead to pray for us. Only the living.

Consider what prayer is. God's will is soveirgn. Our prayers don't change God's will. Our prayers change us into better understanding and accepting God's will. Mary and anyone else in heaven don't need to pray. They are face-to-face with God. They talk to God like Adam and Eve in the Garden. It is human reasoning to think Mary or the saints can effect God's will for us. We must not confuse Mary interacting with Jesus on earth with prayer in heaven.

If you have God's invitation to talk directly with Him, why would you choose anything else? You have God's ear! That's not taking into account Mary and the saints can't hear your prayers (prayer is only to God).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,549
12,099
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,178,020.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
If you have God's invitation to talk directly with Him, why would you choose anything else?
Because it is pleasing to God when we do so.

That's not taking into account Mary and the saints can't hear your prayers (prayer is only to God).
That is not our experience, nor do I agree with your claim that prayer is only to God. For Protestants that may certainly be true, but it isn't for the majority of Christians today and especially for the last 2 millenia.

All who are in Christ are alive to God. The Church is Christ's body, of which there is only one. There is not one body for the breathing and another body for those who have passed on. There is literally nothing seperating the living from the dead in Christ.

The Church is also a communion of love. We pray for each other in life and in death, and it apparently pleases God greatly for us to seek each other's prayers and support, since there are innumerable miracles which have occurred through the intercessions of the Saints, especially the Mother of God
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,218
3,024
Minnesota
✟212,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Whose voice said, "This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased" while Jesus was being baptised by John? And what was the bodily form who descended on Jesus?
Who said those are Three Persons of the Holy Trinity and together are one God?
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,104.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Who said those are Three Persons of the Holy Trinity and together are one God?
Anyone who accepts the conclusions of the Council of Nicea, and those who use their commonsense instead of religious prejudice.
 
Upvote 0

concretecamper

Member of His Church
Nov 23, 2013
6,776
2,568
PA
✟274,088.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Who said those are Three Persons of the Holy Trinity and together are one God?
The Tradition of the Church says so. Scripture doesn't say so. But people are too proud to admit it.

The profession of the Church Fathers at Nicea says the Father and Son are consubstantial (from the same substance). But that isn't Trinity. The Church grew in it's understanding of the Trinity.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,424
5,292
✟825,030.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
The Tradition of the Church says so. Scripture doesn't say so. But people are too proud to admit it.

The profession of the Church Fathers at Nicea says the Father and Son are consubstantial (from the same substance). But that isn't Trinity. The Church grew in it's understanding of the Trinity.
If valletta is arguing against the traditional doctrine of the Trinity, they the arguement is against CF's SoF, as this is a "Christian only" forum. Don't feed the trolls. LOL.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,549
12,099
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,178,020.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
If valletta is arguing against the traditional doctrine of the Trinity, they the arguement is against CF's SoF, as this is a "Christian only" forum. Don't feed the trolls. LOL.
I think you misunderstood Valletta's post.
 
Upvote 0

NotUrAvgGuy

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
935
397
Boise, Idaho
Visit site
✟66,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The Tradition of the Church says so. Scripture doesn't say so. But people are too proud to admit it.

The profession of the Church Fathers at Nicea says the Father and Son are consubstantial (from the same substance). But that isn't Trinity. The Church grew in it's understanding of the Trinity.
If the Father and the Son are consubstantial and both called God, and if the Holy Spirit is also called God (and Scripture declares that is One God), then the Holy Spirit must be consubstantial. That is simply a logical conclusion from Scripture and did not require additional revelation to "the tradition of the church."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

concretecamper

Member of His Church
Nov 23, 2013
6,776
2,568
PA
✟274,088.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
then the Holy Spirit must be consubstantial
Scripture please showing the Father and Son are consubstantial. And then scripture showing that the Holy Spirit is consubstantial with the Father and the Son.

You can't get around it. Just admit you accept an authority other than scripture to explain the Trinity. Everyone Trinitarian protestant accepts the Tradition of His Church when it comes to what they believe about the Trinity.
 
Upvote 0