NxNW
Well-Known Member
The economy in which we just added 311,000 jobs? Or the one with GDP growth of 2.9%?While Trump is Biden's favorite excuse for all his own failures, Biden created the economy we are now suffering in.
Upvote
0
The economy in which we just added 311,000 jobs? Or the one with GDP growth of 2.9%?While Trump is Biden's favorite excuse for all his own failures, Biden created the economy we are now suffering in.
Let's take a look at the Board of directors - Old White heterosexual Republican men - Seems to me of the nine Board of directors Three are woman and one is a black man -You seem to have a bad habit of missing the forest for the tree. Mr. Cephas is on the board of directors, but as his bio notes, his day job is with the law firm of Squire Patton Boggs. He is also only one of nine members of the board nor is he it's chairman.
View attachment 329011
That's a very weird way to admit that Me. Cephas isn't "the Director" of SVB.Let's take a look at the Board of directors - Old White heterosexual Republican men - Seems to me of the nine Board of directors Three are woman and one is a black man -
The Board of Directors are who oversee the Bank _ duh (I don't believe I even have to say this) - they are the ones who - ready - DIRECT the bank, the final overseeing authority, the ones who make the major decisions.
So - no - it is NOT a bunch of Republican old White Men .
Look also at post #3 -
If you are going to accuse the modern boogeyman (straight, white old Republican men) at least get it right on who the board is made of.
It's one way to not look bad. or just a way to get back for another thread that was actually accurate in it's reporting.
What is his title on the bank website - check it and get back with me.That's a very weird way to admit that Me. Cephas isn't "the Director" of SVB.
Know what the difference is?
Know what the difference is?
lol seriously? No, it doesn’t- that’s why he’s getting shredded over there. He doesn’t support his contention in that thread any more than I did in this one.That posters link supports the accusation - yours does not.
which is why you are getting shredded on this one - feel better now?I do. The difference is that, while they’re both farcical, mine was deliberately so.
lol seriously? No, it doesn’t- that’s why he’s getting shredded over there. He doesn’t support his contention in that thread any more than I did in this one.
only by folks who don’t get the joke.which is why you are getting shredded on this one
Why? because you started a thread seemingly based on race - sexuality - ageism - Christophobia and political affiliation.only by folks who don’t get the joke.
why do I have to explain any of this…
How did that other poster's link support the accusation?That posters link supports the accusation - yours does not.
Now you’re getting it!Did they hire a Gay Mongolian Buddhist Amputee with no finance credentials as an affirmative action hire & time traveling abilities who went back in time 30 years and encouraged them to make single-threaded investment choices, discouraged them from diversifying their lending offerings, and gave them bad advice on their cash reserves policies?
You are referring here to the CFNC&E gold standard of iron clad causal reasoning....
Their entire premise was "Bank failed" -> "Bank did this thing I don't like" -> "Conclusion: This thing I don't like must have been what caused this bank to fail"
....
Signature is one of the main banks to the cryptocurrency industry, the biggest one next to Silvergate, which announced its impending liquidation last week. It had a market value of $4.4 billion as of Friday after a 40% sell-off this year, according to FactSet.
Like I said, you have a really bad habit of doing this. You get something wrong and then you double down when others point out your error.What is his title on the bank website - check it and get back with me.
a - the - one of the - are we yet struggling over three letter words yet again?
Since we apparently need to do this, let's go through each of the directors.You seem to have a bad habit of missing the forest for the tree. Mr. Cephas is on the board of directors, but as his bio notes, his day job is with the law firm of Squire Patton Boggs. He is also only one of nine members of the board nor is he it's chairman.
View attachment 329011
Um, and Silicon Valley Bank failed as well, dominated by Democrats. So what? Bad management and national policy is bad management and policy.More proof that going Republican doesn't make for a successful business.
Regulators close crypto-focused Signature Bank, citing systemic risk
U.S. regulators on Sunday shut down New York-based Signature Bank in a bid to prevent the spreading banking crisis.www.cnbc.comSignature Bank Profile: Recipients
Signature Bank organization profile: candidate recipients for the 2024 cycle and top recipients of all types for the 2024 cycle.www.opensecrets.org
They obviously weren’t all on-board with all the Woke buzzwords and phrases being thrown around: Diversity, Inclusion, Tolerance, equity, social justice, empathy, blah blah blah! No, they let a bunch of old white guys run their company into the ground.
Let's hope corporate America actually WAKES up and focuses on hiring intelligent and capable people rather than just maintaining the status quo of perspective employee's skin tone, or favoring an employee who has sex with those of the opposite gender, or favoring men.
Tell me you didn’t read the thread without telling me you didn’t read the thread.Um, and Silicon Valley Bank failed as well, dominated by Democrats. So what? Bad management and national policy is bad management and policy.
About 77% of SVB's total 2022 donations were to Democratic candidates and groups, while only 23% were contributions to the GOP.
So you didn't even read the article posted which substantiates my point. Why bother responding nonsubstantively? I did read the original post, but not every single response on every page.Tell me you didn’t read the thread without telling me you didn’t read the thread.
So you didn't even read the article posted which substantiates my point.
Right, which means you missed the point I was making.Why bother responding nonsubstantively? I did read the original post, but not every single response on every page.