He doesn't want to discriminate other people, he sells cakes, but doesn't want to make on specially for that, i understand that, is violating his conscience, why not leaving him alone instead of suing him. Also you can't defend racism with the bible.
History shows otherwise. When the schools were integrated, most of the segregation academies that were formed to exclude blacks were Christian private schools.
Okay. Not sure what that has to do with what I’ve said in this thread, though.
The assertion seems to be that there should be no laws which violate any potential business owner's conscience, but given the varied opinions about what is right and wrong, that would literally force all laws to be repealed. And in that case, a "They should operate within the law" claim makes no sense given there'd be literally no law to operate within.
He is discriminating
He makes wedding cakes and they are all special. He chooses to not make them for one minority and that is discrimination just like if he was refusing to make a wedding cake for black people or people in wheelchairs or Buddhists or anyone else.
And the KKK just wants to practice their religious views and engage in free speech and burn crosses in black people's yards. Why are those poor men and women of the KK so unjustly persecuted?
there several centuries worth of biblical defense saying you are wrong.
I’m not against all laws. Some laws are necessary to protect the safety and welfare of other. But if a black-owned business doesn’t want to sell items to white folks, they should be able to make that choice.
Only if you make incorrect assumptions. Which, judging by your response, you have.
They forgot the part where the 2nd most important commandment is love you neighbour as yourself, and the golden rule. Don't do to other what you wouldn't like others to do to you.
www.cbsnews.com
The hockey player is 1.) not a football player, who 2.) isn't refusing service to customers while 3.) running a business that is 4.) classified as a public accommodation.You also condemn the football player that didn't want to wear a lgbt jersey?
This is the same.Philadelphia Flyers' Ivan Provorov refuses to wear LGBTQ+ Pride Night jersey, cites religious beliefs
"My choice is to stay true to myself and my religion," Ivan Provorov told reporters.
So if you don't follow my ideology you are a "bigot" that the way it is now, and... please you are fired thanks too. This is balloney if you don't see it.
No, being a bigot is the same as it always has been: "one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance"
Except there already cases of people losing jobs just because not supporting for some reason or just stating what they believe, without attacking anyone verbally or physically.
