And , looking at Rom 5:10 do not see Paul speaking about rewards or , is there another verse ?
Romans 5:10 is an introduction to his explanation of Sanctification running from
5:12 through to
8:13.
This Sanctification is not merely one of being set aside in a holy position as dedicated to God.
This Sanctification is about subjectively having Christ's life spread from within outward into every part of our personality.
Think of total salvation in two main steps.
1.) A
judicial redemption, reconciled to God, having the enmity between us and God removed by His
DEATH on the cross.
2.) An
organic sanctification, being saved in the whole realm of His resurrection
LIFE permeating and filling up more and more of our life.
"For if we, being enemies, were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more we will be saved in His life, having been reconciled."
I am now going to say the same thing again in other words. That is in words expressing TIME - past and future.
1.) Judicially we HAVE BEEN
[past] reconciled to God through the death of His Son.
2.) Organically we WILL BE
[future] saved by the sanctification of His resurrection life.
I am now going to say the same thing in reference to the church universal, the mystical Body of Christ.
1.) Everyone who is reconciled to God through the DEATH of His Son is a constituent of the church universal.
2.) Every constituent of the church must be eventually Sanctified subjectively in the realm of His indwelling divine life, His life in resurrection.
Now you ask, I think, Ie.
"Isn't there some concept of rewards there in Romans 5:10?"
My reply would be, that one might hunt and find some relation to rewards in the second part of that verse.
" . . . much more we will be saved in His life, having been reconciled."
What I mean is that it is not hard for me to shoe into an exposition of
Romans 5:10b SOMETHING about rewards.
By the time of the millennial kingdom, Christ, at His judgment seat, will REWARD those who He deems have taking the opportunity
during their lives to be SANCTIFIED after knowing they were reconciled to God through His death.
They allowed the Lord to save them dispositionally in their personality and conduct by the growth and influence of His resurrection life.
Having said that, I say Paul is not speaking too much about rewards in
Romans 5:10 as he is in other places like
First Corinthians 3:14,15.
BUT . . . if you really wish to hunt out some relationship to reward given at the judgment seat of Christ, you could conceivably derive that from
Romans 5:10. I don't think Paul is elaborating specifically on that then.
You are welcome to disagree and say
"No, there is the matter of reward there in Romans 5:10."
I will not insist there is not if you want to see reward there.
In the PAST I was reconciled to God through the death of His Son at Calvary.
As to my FUTURE I must
"much more" be saved dispositionally by His indwelling resurrection life
I am [now] being pretty redundant and verbose.
You were talking about the word CHURCH and is the CHURCH in Acts 7:38 the same Church as in Rom 16:1 or is it the same as in Rev 2:1 /
Yes, the whole discussion relates to the universal church. That is the church which is His Body covering all time from her inception to eternity future, her consumation. It covers all places, all times, all who have been reconciled to God through the death of His Son and are subject to the process of being much more saved by Christ's indwelling.
Is the church mentioned in
Acts 7:38?
"This is the one who was in the assembly in the wilderness with the Angel who spoke to him in Mount Sinai and with our fathers, and who received living oracles of God."
This "church" ort "assembly" is not the new testament church. But eventually they are included in the church in the sense of having Christ's life indwelling them, that they may be
"saved in His life." God determines which of them was
"reconciled to God through the death of His Son" because of , let us say, their faith in God's word, especially the offerings, sacrifices done as shadows of the Christ to come and HIS one time offering of Himself.
If you grill me now as to how God will do this, I do not have all those details. But the New Jerusalem which is the climax of the church has the Old Testaments saints under the Mt. Sinai law giving represented by the names of the twelve tribes over the twelve gates.
"It had a great and high wall and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names inscribed, which are the names of the twelve rtibes of the sons of Isael." (Rev. 21:12). This proves that old covenant believers of the twelve tribes are included in this Bride and Wife of Christ in eternity.
And the new covenant saints of the new testament church are included as signified by the names of the twelve new testament apostles on the foundations of the city.
"And the wall of the city had twelve foundation, and on them the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb." (Rev. 21:14)
Old convenat saints are there in eternity in the consummation of the church.
New covenant saints are there in eternity in the consummation of the church.
If I recall rightly, the same word in the Greek for the assembly is also used concerning an unruly, unbelieving and riotous mob of opposers to Paul's preaching in Ephesus.
"For we are in danger of being charged with insurrection for today's affair, since there is no reason for it . . this disorderly gathering. And when he had said these things, he dismissed the assembly." (See Acts 19:40,41)
My point being we New Testament readers must be discerning when we see EKKLESIA or related word. Does EVERY mention of an ekklesia mean the new testament church? This riotous mob was not the Lord's assembly. But it was an assembly.
And the assembly at the foot of Mt. Sinai was not YET the new testament EKKLESIA. But all who Christ saved will be in eternity.
The church mentioned in
Romans 16:1 is the local church in a city called Cenchrea. The church that was there - in Cenchrea.
Revelation 2:1 is letter to
"the church in Ephesus" for the benefit to all the churches and to the church universal.
"I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a deaconess of the church which is in Cenchrea." (Rom. 16:1)
The universal church is that which every saved believer belongs to in all of time in every place throughout history.
The
"church which is in Cenchrea" was the local expression of this universal church.
Like
"the church in Jerusalem" or "the church in Phillippi" or
"the church in Corinth" or
"the church of the Thessalonians" or
"the church in Laodicea" . . . etc,
The local expression in practicality of the universal church. The church in the locality of Cenchrea including all the saved Christians in Cenchrea. This is this church that one can take a problem to
(Matt. 18:17).
"And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to hear the church also let him be to you just like the Gentile and the tax collector." (v.17)
This is not the universal church. We cannot take a problem between a few brothers to the universal church.
We can take a problem between Christians to the practical local assembly- the local church which is somewhere. in some place.
"Phoebe our sister, who is a deaconess of the [local] church which is in Cenchrea."
If you have a point behind your question, you might just make the point you wish.
You do not have to place it in the form of a question. I have not read all your posts.
You may have made some point elsewhere which your questions imply. I may not know what that point is you
are driving at. Is it something to do with Israel and the church?