The Open Theist will say that God is still omniscient, or all-knowing, but only in the sense that He knows all things that can be known.Everyone accepts that God is omniscient, even those who believe in open theism. But this is not how your Calvinist preachers define Predestination. The Calvinist belief in limited atonement is a pernicious error. "John Calvin rejected the idea that God permits rather than actively decrees the damnation of sinners, as well as other evil.[53]"
Predestination - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Isaiah 46:10The Open Theist will say that God is still omniscient, or all-knowing, but only in the sense that He knows all things that can be known.
And the future is not one of those things that can be known.
Foreknowledge is one aspect of omniscience they reject.
An important question! Of course, not everyone is precisely the same -- some come to faith as young children, with little or nothing really needing repentance at that point, but others of course come as adults that certainly have done some real wrongs in life.I've noticed a lot of this "repent" before "belief" statements on the forum lately. I thought repentance (turning) was a result, not a precursor, to a restored relationship with God.
It seems that any disagreement we are having is about definitions. That isn't how I understand repentance at all. No worries, this is a common (though aggravating for me) thing among Christians. I understand what you are saying.Repentance is the step of admitting one has been a sinner, so it's hand in hand with relying on Christ in faith for the forgiveness of sins.
Significantly, repentance is an act of faith. (so, when someone repents, then they are showing faith in Christ)
Sorry that this topic is frustrating to you. The was I see it is repentance is a larger encompassing word that includes confession, when we consider the kind of repentance the Bible calls us to. Yes, repentance means a change of mind, but when the Bible speaks of it as a condition for salvation, it is my understanding that we are to repent of sins in particular. A change of mind implies moving in a new direction or really the opposite direction. When we repent we must always take at least three clear steps. You can remember these three essential steps by using the acronym CAR. The first step in the process of repentance is to confess your sin. The second step is to affirm God's forgiveness of your sin. The third step is to request Jesus' grace to change. I don't want to speak for Halbhh but I think what he should mean to say is that repentance is an act of grace, God's grace; repentance is the means by which you lay hold of Jesus' forgiving and transforming grace.It seems that any disagreement we are having is about definitions. That isn't how I understand repentance at all. No worries, this is a common (though aggravating for me) thing among Christians. I understand what you are saying.
To me, CONFESSION "is the step of admitting one has been a sinner". (not repentance)
REPENTANCE is to turn away from, or toward, something.
This post has bothered me for quite some time. So I decided to look up the phrase "vast majority" in Latin. I found that that exact phrase is written "magna pars." Since Latin was Augustine's native language, if he had intended to say "vast majority" he would have written "magna pars" NOT "immo quam plurimi!" Another swing and a miss for the high priestess of UR.I would quickly change it back again if I were you before anyone notices. Compare your "quick check" against the scholarship of someone of Ramelli's stature:
"The historian Ilaria Ramelli comments that when Augustine described the Universalists as "indeed very many" (immo quam plurimi), what he meant is that they were a "vast majority" (Ramelli, Christian Doctrine, 11). That is what the Latin word plurimi, from the adjective plurimus, implies."
I missed this post when first posted but I revisited another post on this page and decided to post a response. I didn't say or imply that I trusted Augustine. I was responding to another poster's misrepresentation of what Augustine said. See my post #348, above.Well, if you can trust his observation of his own experience you ought to question his hellish doctrine regarding that which he never saw. Come on, Der Alte.
As I mentioned, aionios / eternal is an adjective that refers to timeless eternity / the divine realm.Note, the native Greek speaking Eastern Orthodox Greek scholars, translators of the EOB, translated “aionios,” in Matt 25:46, as “eternal,
Kolasis means punishment. But the words "correction" and "pruning" are nouns.Sorry, that is impossible, both “prune” and “correction” are verbs.
"Correct" is a verb, "correction" is a "noun" "Prune" is a verb, "pruning" is an infinitive.As I mentioned, aionios / eternal is an adjective that refers to timeless eternity / the divine realm.
Kolasis means punishment. But the words "correction" and "pruning" are nouns.