Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud

Saying "how they did it" is very misleading if you don't actually come up with cases of it happening. In fact your link describes how to detect fraud that used this technique, but doesn't mention any cases of actual fraud. I can imagine all sorts of ways people could commit voter fraud... and how to detect it. And we still don't have any large scale cases detected.

From your website: "The Fractal team spent the last 20 months, with guidance from Mike Lindell, encouragement from the great Sheriff David Clarke, and over a dozen election integrity teams advancing voter integrity analysis from the ancient, batch, latent to the modern, current real-time."

Gee... Mick Lindell is the primary guidance for this?????

As an election officer in Virginia, when someone comes to vote in-person and our database shows that they received a ballot by mail, that person can either bring in their mailed in ballot, which can be marked as spoiled and they receive a fresh ballot, or they can vote provisionally. It is noted in the database that a ballot that is mailed in is not counted.

Virginia

According to the Department of Elections: “If you have requested or received an absentee by mail ballot but would rather vote in person, please bring your unopened ballot with you when you go to vote. If you have lost or did not receive your ballot, you may either vote early in person at your registrar’s office or cast a provisional ballot at your polling place on Election Day.”

I read the editorial with lots of wild accusations, but no supporting documentation or reference links. This is tinfoil hat stuff.

Only the Post Office can change a zip code, and there would be records of that.

HARK! said:

In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address.

Click to expand...

I had to delete my first post because the article does say they found a county but it's just like other info coming from the Mike Lindell bunch, just like his computer N Dakota debacle it can't be trusted.

When they have turned this info. over to the authorities, Republicans, and they have named the county where they say this happened, then people may begin to believe the boy who cried wolf, Lindell.

HARK! said:

Maybe things are different in your neck of the woods. When I send a letter I can write any zip that I wish. I like to choose the correct one; but if I made a "mistake;" I doubt that my post office would correct it.

Click to expand...

The editorial claims that zip codes were changed, and then changed back. Only the Post Office can do that. If something was mailed with the incorrect zip code, that sounds like a clerical error somewhere. Fortunately, if ballots failed to arrive, voters have recourse.

HARK! said:

Maybe things are different in your neck of the woods. When I send a letter I can write any zip that I wish. I like to choose the correct one; but if I made a "mistake;" I doubt that my post office would correct it.

Click to expand...

True. The ballots that are not delivered are returned to the County Clerk and Recorder's office that sent them out.
Who is it that you say is changing the zip codes and then changing them back? County clerks, computer hackers, who?

What does it mean “the zip codes were changed and then changed back?”

Changed on what? Changed back by whom? This is pretty confusing.

HARK! said:

You might want to read it again.

In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address.

Our teams in Wisconsin and Florida are discovering this scam by the truckload -- do not email me that it is not real!

Click to expand...

That example wasn't given as a case of voter fraud. It was given as a way voter fraud could conceivably take place, although it could be detected afterwards easily enough. And so far, there's no sign that such fraud took place.

DaisyDay said:

What does it mean “the zip codes were changed and then changed back?”

Changed on what? Changed back by whom? This is pretty confusing.

Click to expand...

That's the U and D part of FUD - Fear, uncertainty, and doubt - Wikipedia

HARK! said:

We take that election roll, with perhaps 15 million voters, Florida, for instance, or Texas -- compare every voter against every other voter and address, down to the cell level, and see any differences -- every day!

What do we find?

In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address. Curious?

That means the voter did not change their address, continued to receive all their mail, except one item -- a ballot sent from a voter commission.

Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud

Database latency -- a geeky term, but that’s how they did it! A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store -- so the police are on alert. ...

www.americanthinker.com

Click to expand...

For starters, in order for a mail in ballot to be accepted you need to match the signature of the registrant. Since you are not the registrant, you don't have that signature and so you have to guess. Oops, that won't work, so much for this bright idea.

Fail
and that is just the beginning of the ways that this fails.

HARK! said:

We take that election roll, with perhaps 15 million voters, Florida, for instance, or Texas -- compare every voter against every other voter and address, down to the cell level, and see any differences -- every day!

What do we find?

In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address. Curious?

That means the voter did not change their address, continued to receive all their mail, except one item -- a ballot sent from a voter commission.

Here’s How They Did it: Real-time Election Fraud

Database latency -- a geeky term, but that’s how they did it! A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store -- so the police are on alert. ...

www.americanthinker.com

Click to expand...

The left will make every excuse to why its not real never happened again blah blah blah. Now if a Dem lost and is saying this.. oh then then its true and fact. haha

Blade said:

The left will make every excuse to why it’s not real never happened again blah blah blah. Now if a Dem lost and is saying this.. oh then then its true and fact. haha

Click to expand...

Did you read the link in the OP? Nothing but fantasy without anything to support it.

HARK! said:

You might want to read it again.

In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address.

Click to expand...

How about they provide some actual evidence. Other than claiming a "address change" scam and stating a precise looking number I don't see any specifics. What county? When were the ZIP codes changed? (If they have actual evidence they can provide both.) How were the ZIP codes changed? (Not the technical means used, but what were they changed to? Is it a shift? a random value? What?)

It feels like some people have a conclusion that they are desperately seeking to find articles that support that conclusion. So desperately that they are not engaging critical thinking and so if the article agrees with their conclusion they are not then looking into the details of the article and seeing if it presents the evidence they are desperate for.

HARK! said:

I didn't realize that the Federal Post Office had control of the States' Election Commission's databases.

Do you have any evidence to support this claim?

Click to expand...

I made no such claim.