Why people reject the reality of Hell

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ezekiel 18:20 "The soul the sinneth, it shall die. the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him."

In view is physical death for violation of the Covenant of Law.

Do you also teach that men can receive Eternal Life through keeping the Law?

Please answer, because you have to in order for you impose an eternal context into this passage.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The first death is our separation from God in this life. The Second death is separation from God eternally in the Lake of Fire.


Life has no part in the LOF no matter how much you put it in there and hide it under the guise of separation from God but still in torment for an eternity.

I agree, but you completely ignored the points raised in the post to show that "the dead" do not have life, despite the fact that they are resurrected from the dead prior to being cast into the Lake of Fire:


Revelation 20
King James Version

1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.



Do you really not see that the Second Death has power on those who are dead who are not resurrected at the beginning of the Millennial Kingdom?

Do you really not see they are resurrected?

Do you really not see that there are those on whom the Second Death will have no power over and those it will have power over?

Do you really not understand the difference between men having life through Christ and men not having life through Christ despite whether they are physically alive or dead?


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Hades, as in the Rich Man's case, only the spirit of the Rich Man is there. He is still a "soul" because he is still the person that physically died.

Of course he's still there. We haven't gotten to the LOF and final judgement at that point. The other side of the gulf is not the same thing as the LOF at final judgement.

It is the same: the rich man is in torment. He has not ceased to exist. He is not going to receive the life of Christ.

He will be resurrected from the dead at which time his spirit will be reunited with his body, and he will have physical life again as opposed to being a spirit in Hades suffering everlasting torment (everlasting because it will continue for eternity in Hell, the Lake of Fire).

His works will be judged and if he is not found in the Book of Life he will be cast into the Lake of Fire:


Revelation 20:11-15
King James Version

11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.



Only those who are written in The Book of Life will enter into the Eternal State:


Revelation 22:19
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.



Those not found in the Book of Life will be cast into the Lake of Fire, which is the Gehenna Hell Christ teaches about in numerous passages, and teaches as an enduring punishment, not annihilation, and not a form of purging or cleansing.

Believers are cleansed by the Word of God, not fire.

And only believers will be found in the Book of Life.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There's no resurrection in the LOF. Totally unbiblical and once again goes against our Father's and Christ's teaching.

Nice try:

They are resurrected and cast into the Lake of Fire. The Beast and the False Prophet go into the Lake of Fire alive.

but when this man is cast into the Lake of Fire, he will be resurrected as taught in Revelation 20. Both body and soul (person) will be in torment forever.

These statements are given in the order they are in the post, and it is pretty clear that their resurrection takes place prior to their being cast into the Lake of Fire.

I agree, there is no resurrection in the Lake of Fire, but that doesn't change the fact that the lost, who are dead (yet still in existence in Hades/Sheol awaiting Eternal Punishment) are resurrected and like the Beast and the False Prophet are cast alive into the Lake of Fire (Revelation 19:20).

And, as I explained in the post you responded to, being "alive" does not equate to having Eternal Life.

Only those who are born again have Eternal Life.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Lake of Fire is a spiritual place,

The Lake of Fire is a spiritual place, not a physical place we might get into a rocket ship and one day find. The dead, those without the life of Christ, are resurrected to fulfill Christ's teaching that God will destroy both soul (person) and body (the physical body) in Hell, the Lake of Fire.

Your own words. It's the second death -Christ's words.

Actually, those are John's words.

Christ called it Gehenna.

I've put my statement back into the context in which you pulled it from, and I am surprised to learn you think the Lake of Fire is a physical place in this universe.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If one takes the Bible as a whole it's really easy to see the nature of God. Going back to Ezekiel 18,

Ezekiel 18:21 "But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all My statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die."

Ezekiel 18:22 "All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live."

Ezekiel 18:23 "Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord God: and not that he should return from his ways, and live?"

So, if God doesn't want to do something, that means He won't do it?

Is that the point you seek to make?

Guess by your reasoning you must not think God would manifest in the flesh and die in the stead of the sinner, either:


Hebrews 10:5-9
King James Version

5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:

6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure.

7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.

8 Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law;

9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.


Sorry, but I don't see this as valid reasoning, but human reasoning with an intent to ignore the Whole of Scripture.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm sure you've read these verses but have you ever really taken them to heart??

Actually, no, because I am in relationship with God through the New Covenant, not through the COvenant of Law, and that is what is in view in Ezekiel 18: physical death for violating the Law, not Eternal Punishment for rejecting the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

God doesn't even want the wicked to perish.

He didn't care much for animal sacrifice, either, but He established it as the Old Testament means for remission of sins.


Yet you think he would torment someone for an eternity?

No, actually, I dont. Their torment cannot be charged to God.

He will separate them from Himself for eternity, and their torment will be according to their own works.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This verse as well as others like it show he that does not even want anyone to die, he wants all to come to repentance.

II Peter 3:9 "The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

Again, that He doesn't want any to die doesn't mean that they won't.

And again, all men are dead when they are conceived and born. Hiw will for men is that they believe in His Son:


Acts 4:11-12
King James Version

11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.

12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.


Acts 17:30-31
King James Version

30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:

31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This verse as well as others like it show he that does not even want anyone to die, he wants all to come to repentance.

II Peter 3:9 "The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

So let's see what else Peter says in this chapter:


2 Peter 3
King James Version

1 This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance:

2 That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:

3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,



Having just concluded a chapter about false teachers, Peter now turns his focus to Scoffers, and it should be noted those walking after their own lusts are rejecting the teachings of Scripture (as the false prophets of old and the false teachers of Peter's day) so Peter exhorts that they keep the Scriptures and the commandments of Christ in mind when faced with those who reject what Scripture teaches.

He goes on to give the example:


4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.


5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:


6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:



A flood? What nonsense, the scoffer says. Why that's just bronze-age thinking.

Christ is returning? What nonsense, nothing has changed at all.

Eternal Punishment? What nonsense, Christ never taught that! All those verses that have Him teaching about an unending punishment and unending fire and unending separation from God and men being dead when we know they are alive just don't mean what they say. Just as a promise of His return doesn't mean what it says.


7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.


Don't believe them, Peter says. The earth was destroyed in a flood, and as he mentioned in chapter two those who were destroyed are still awaiting the blackness of darkness forever.

The Day of Judgment has not yet arrived, and this because of God's longsuffering.

And Peter keeps the teaching of Christ, speaking of the destruction of of ungodly men.



8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.


God can wait. Time is meaningless to the Eternal God.

It only has meaning for men.

WHile the scoffers think it has been such a long time since the promise was made, and that because it hasn't been fulfilled yet this means it won't be, Peter makes it clear:



9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.


He will fulfill His promises.


10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.


It's not a coincidence that Eternal Punishment often speaks of the heavens and the earth passing away.

They pass away and the dead are judged according to their works.

I don't guess it is necessary to repost the Great White Throne, since it has been posted numerous times already, but—I'll do it anyway:


Revelation 20:11-15
King James Version

11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.


Take careful note that those that end up here are dead, and those not found in the Book of Life are cast into the Lake of Fire. Those that have life will never face this judgment.

I guess the concept of having Eternal Life through Christ by believing in Him is somewhat a mystery for some.

It shouldn't be:


John 6:53
King James Version

53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.


John 5:24
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.


John 11:25
Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:


John 11:26
And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?


That's the question of the day: who believes that men must believe in Christ in order not to die?

Who believes that Christ meant what He said when He said that those who do not believe in Him do not have life?

Who believes that God sent His Son that whosoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life?

Not scoffers.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I was taught as you believe once

No, actually you weren't.

Because if you were, you'd understand that there is a difference between being alive and dead.

You would understand Christ's teaching that only those that are in Christ are alive in an eternal context, and that those who are cast into the Lake of Fire are cast in alive but without Life.


but it doesn't hold up biblically at all if we take the bible as a whole and especially verses like in Ezekiel and Christ's teachings in Matthew 10:28 and Revelation 20.

And you completely ignored what was said in my response to you in regards to these passages and then make this declaration?

That is what doesn't hold up.


That completely nails down what happens to the soul.

Correct: they are in a state of destruction in the Lake of Fire.


It dies/is destroyed fully if we go by the first defintion in the Greek.

Oh, the "first definition in the Greek."

Gotcha.

We don't need to look at all Biblical usage of the word and determine the context of the passages the word is found in.

We don't need to bother with the rest of the Whole of Scripture, but can toss out those passages that use terminology that are pretty evident as describing an enduring torment, like day and night and forever and ever.

We can go to Ezekiel 18, before the fuller revelation of Eternal Judgment is given in the New Testament and use what is obviously referring to a phsyical/temporal context to conclude that being dead means a cessation of existence, even when the Old Testament makes it clear that those who died physically didn't cease to exist.

Moses surely died, and yet he appears on the Mount of Transfiguration.

Why is it that this principle you seek to teach is inconsistent with that?


God bless.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I have been giving short posts. Which of those have you responded to with a direct response to the points made?

You keep posting this:



And you will not answer a simple question:

What animals do we find, other than Sheep and Goats—in Matthew 25?

God bless.

The only animals the Master is speaking in this awesome chapter in two clean animals.

Take 9 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

Note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Yes, context matters. Which means we can take the entire bible and most definitely Christ's teachings in Mattew 10:28 which fit with his teachings that the second death is just that -death.

We certainly know aions can have ends we've seen that numerous times throughout the bible. But death always means death. As I've said, we can't change the meaning. The opposite of death is life. We either achieve life or death, that's it. And we've been told all thoughout what the final state will be of the wicked.

The beginning is God, the ending is God. He swallows all death into Himself in one big gulp!

Our Father is the ta panta of the all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wendykvw
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The only animals the Master is speaking in this awesome chapter in two clean animals.

Maybe you can show me where that is found.

Here are the animals mentioned in Matthew 25:


Matthew 25:32-33
King James Version

32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.



If you want to view these as "two clean animals," okay.

Butit is pretty obvious that this is imposing into the text that which isn't there, and ignoring what is actually there.

Most notice that the five foolish virgins, the unprofitable servant, and the Goats are all excluded from the Kingdom of God.


Matthew 25
King James Version

1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.

2 And five of them were wise, and five were foolish.


11 Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us.

12 But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not.

13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.



No two clean animals there.

Just a warning that there will be those who are not known of Christ who will be shut out of the Kingdom.



14 For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.


Again, the reason for the parable is given, and summed up in "The Kingdom of Heaven is like unto this..."


24 Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed:

25 And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine.

26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:

27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.

28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.

29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.

30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.



Again, intended to warn those who take a wrong view of Christ that there will be those who will be cast into outer darkness, called by Peter and Jude "the blackness of darkness" which shall be forever.

No two clean animals there, either, just one wicked servant that took the opinion that the Just Judge of Men is an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed.

Sounds quite a bit like a universal salvation argument: a God Who is love would never cast men into outer darkness forever.

But that is precisely what it says.

So again, where are these two clean animals you keep speaking about in Matthew 25? So far I only see what Scripture calls dogs and pigs that have never been converted, and are thus thrust out of the Kingdom of God and Heaven.

Here are the two animals that are mentioned:


Matthew 25:32-33
King James Version

32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.



And their fate?


46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.



So if you believe that the everlasting punishment of those the Lord does not know isn't everlasting, then you must equally believe that the righteous will not receive Eternal Life either.

Of course, when someone reads this chapter and only sees two clean animals we have to ask how it is such clear teaching of Christ is hidden from them.

So again, as has been asked since you first started posting this as though somehow Take 9 is going to insert two clean animals into the chapter—where exactly are these two clean animals?


Continued...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Would you mind posting the other 8 "takes" and the responses for them, to show that you have asked this/these question/s without response?

Tell you what, I will post them myself, and we can look at the course of the discussion together:


Search = "eternal condemnation"

There are no references to eternal condemnation in the KJV.

Search = "eternal torment"

There are no references to eternal torment in the KJV

Search = "the love of God"

There are 166 references to the love of God

The steadfast love of the Lord never ceases...

Search Trinity.

Your advice is worthless, because you are trying to condemn (pun intended) words we use to describe Doctrines and concepts in Scripture and make a case that because "eternal condemnation" isn't found you have somehow supported your argument.

Are you a monotheist, then? Because to be consistent you are going to have to equally argue against the Trinity.

Address the Scripture and the points, as I have with your proof-texts. To keep repeating "There's no such thing as Eternal Condemnation" hasn't helped you yet, and dodging the actual discussion isn't helping you.

And this is how supporters of false doctrine always have to engage in a Doctrinal Discussion: by avoiding the discussion.


God bless.

The one passage of Scripture addressing everlasting punishment by Jesus Christ, has a context and five conditions for the same.

Questions =

1. What are the conditions for "everlasting punishment": there are 5 ?

2. Why is the Master speaking of virgins (5 wise/ 5 unwise)?

3. Why two clean animals, rather than one clean & one unclean?

Here is the condition made clear:


Matthew 25:45-46
King James Version

45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.

46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.



You are trying to take a parable that has as a first application the Millennial Kingdom (will money be relevant to the Eternal State?) and ignoring Christ's summation.

Just deal with the summation, Fine Linen.

Do you really not see that the Lord states without controversy that there will be those who go away into everlasting punishment and those that will have Life Eternal?

Why kick at the goads?


God bless.

Take 2

Pilgrim are you asleep at the switch?

The one passage of Scripture addressing everlasting punishment by Jesus Christ, has a context and five conditions for the same.

Questions =

1. What are the conditions for "everlasting punishment": there are 5 ?

2. Why is the Master speaking of virgins (5 wise/ 5 unwise)?

3. Why two clean animals, rather than one clean & one unclean?

You know, that is a very real possibility: it does get a little boring addressing the same arguments over and over.

Yawn...

;)

The one passage addressing everlasting punishment.

That's a good error to address first:


Mark 9:43-44
King James Version

43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:

44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.



Here is a second of many passages addressing everlasting punishment.

What are you going to do with it?

What will you say since your assertion...

...has been shown to be in error?

How then does their worm die? How then is the fire quenched?

I told you...

And here you are again posting the same absurd notion that there are "five conditions for everlasting punishment."

First, are you saying that if these five conditions are met then people will endure everlasting punishment?

Secondly, you ignore the context of the Ten Virgins and fail to place them in the proper Historical Context and this is supposed to mean something to...who?

Third, you did not bother to address my response to your statement the first time around and you ask me to do what you are not willing to do?

I already told you: He is addressing the conditions that will exist at His Return.

Do you really not understand that the Scripture that reveals to us a better understanding concerning Eternal Judgment was not yet given in regards to His Second Coming?

The Jews, including Christ's disciples—thought they would see the fulfillment of all Prophecy concerning the Coming of Messiah. They did not understand that the Lord would die on the Cross, return to His Father's House, and then return again in judgment of the physical world.

How is this relevant to "The one passage of Scripture addressing everlasting punishment by Jesus Christ?"

Perhaps you would show me two clean animals in Matthew 25?


God bless.

Take 3 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?

Sorry, but FineLinen's false doctrine doesn't set the standard for Scripture, Scripture sets the standard for FineLinen.

Answer my questions.

How about just one: what animals are mentioned in "the only passage where Jesus Christ teaches everlasting judgment?"

You can persist in ignoring what is being said, but it only shows the inability to engage in honesat discussion.


God bless.

There is no passage in Canon speaking of "everlasting judgment", (aionios kolasis), NONE ! !

Take 4 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?

Show why clean and unclean animals are relevant to the "only passage Christ teaches everlasting judgment" in.

Or, simply address what I have already responded in my direct repsonse to your doctrine.

It's up to you, FineLinen. I am sorry you think you have an argument with this, and think that reposting changes either my own responses to it or validates it as relevant.

God bless.

We can't note the context unless you actually provide what Scripture you are referring to.

Where are the two clean and one unclean animals in Matthew 25?


God bless.

Focus Lion: we are speaking of the one single passage of Scripture regarding "everlasting punishment".

Matthew 25:46

Take 6 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?

It is called the Lake of Fire, not the Lake of God.

Fire is representative of judgment, and this is contrasted with salvation—both everlasting:


Matthew 3:11-12
King James Version

11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

12 Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.



You would need to provide Scripture to correlate with whatever point it is you are trying to make.

God bless.

Instead of posting with walls of Scripture, take a season and examine what the koine theion and theioo means and report back your results.

Take 8 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

Note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?

I have been giving short posts. Which of those have you responded to with a direct response to the points made?

You keep posting this:

And you will not answer a simple question:

What animals do we find, other than Sheep and Goats—in Matthew 25?

God bless.

The only animals the Master is speaking in this awesome chapter in two clean animals.

Take 9 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

Note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?




So there it is. The entire conversation. I see your post being answered yet you still repost it without responding to the responses.

Would this be spamming?

And I am wondering where Take 5 and Take 7 are.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"

As already addressed, trying to disprove Everlasting Punishment by requiring these English words and ignoring the rest of the teachings of Christ and Scripture doesn't even reach a level that can be called an argument from silence.

Why no response to this:


P1LGR1M said:
The one passage addressing everlasting punishment.

That's a good error to address first:


Mark 9:43-44
King James Version

43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:

44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.



Here is a second of many passages addressing everlasting punishment.

What are you going to do with it?



Everlasting Punishment is taught in many passages that have been presented over and over again.

Yet you continue spamming the same post.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
12,411
3,707
70
Franklin, Tennessee
✟221,085.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I agree, but you completely ignored the points raised in the post to show that "the dead" do not have life
So you're chucking dead bodies into the inferno. Isn't that akin to flogging that proverbial dead horse?

despite the fact that they are resurrected from the dead prior to being cast into the Lake of Fire:
And the LOF is the second... what was that again?The second eternal torment?
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

In Matthew 25 alone, we have several mentions of everlasting punishment:



Matthew 25
King James Version

1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.


11 Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us.

12 But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not.


There's one.


14 For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.


26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:


27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.


28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.


29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.


30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.



There's the second.


31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:

33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:


41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:



There's the third.


46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.



And this is the fourth time Christ mentions Everlasting Punishment.

He only needs to use the words everlasting punishment once for the same concept He is teaching throughout the entire chapter.

And still no mention of two clean animals to be found anywhere.

So how is it that what you are teaching, which isn't found in the text, and what the Lord is teaching, which is found in the text—are in such direct conflict with each other?

I've asked numerous times for you to answer these questions, yet you continue spamming the same post. Why is that?


Continued...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So you're chucking dead bodies into the inferno. Isn't that akin to flogging that proverbial dead horse?

And the LOF is the second... what was that again?The second eternal torment?

Obviously you didn't read the post, so I will give you an opportunity to do so, and you will see why I never said dead bodies were cast into the Lake of Fire.

If you really need me to point out in the posts why your charge is false, as well as your argument, I will be glad to do so, but it should be easy enough for you to see your error for yourself.

Why is it that those who embrace universal salvation and annihilation must repost the same arguments when those arguments have been addressed?

And how is it that they can do this without realizing their questions are answered in the very posts they quote?


God bless.
 
Upvote 0