Why people reject the reality of Hell

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Sorry, but FineLinen's false doctrine doesn't set the standard for Scripture, Scripture sets the standard for FineLinen.

Answer my questions.

How about just one: what animals are mentioned in "the only passage where Jesus Christ teaches everlasting judgment?"

You can persist in ignoring what is being said, but it only shows the inability to engage in honesat discussion.


God bless.
There is no passage in Canon speaking of "everlasting judgment", (aionios kolasis), NONE ! !

Take 4 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is no passage in Canon speaking of "everlasting judgment", (aionios kolasis), NONE ! !

Take 4 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?

Show why clean and unclean animals are relevant to the "only passage Christ teaches everlasting judgment" in.

Or, simply address what I have already responded in my direct repsonse to your doctrine.

It's up to you, FineLinen. I am sorry you think you have an argument with this, and think that reposting changes either my own responses to it or validates it as relevant.

God bless.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Then they both have "life eternal", then, don't they? Gotta be alive to be punished, right?

I would like to add to the question, "Did you, Jipsah, have life before being born again?"

Second question: are you a vampire? lol

Would you mind explaining why you are a "Blood Drinker?"


God bless.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Heretic

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,026
455
Parts Unknown
✟369,793.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
They don't seem upset to me. Seems like a reasoned address.

God bless.
do you agree with him?

when he says "Fifthly they believe these different translations of the word Hell: they teach that English Bible versions have falsely used the word Hell for Sheol, Gehenna, Hades, people will take these words from other languages and use them to describe totally different places, people will say oh Sheol just means the grave for instance, Sheol is just a grave, you go to the grave. I guess they use this to believe in annihilation or soul sleep. Then they will take the word Gehenna and say that when the Bible uses Gehenna that means it isn’t really talking about hell, just a place in Jerusalem.

Sixthly (building on the fifth point) they use different translations like Greek and Hebrew to explain away words like eternal, they lie and say it doesn’t really mean eternal. It is easy to deceive people in other languages that they don’t know about. Catholic Church used Latin for hundreds of years, nobody could understand it. Anytime someone says we need to go back to the Greek, Latin or Hebrew for something, that is a red flag, this person is trying to change the meaning of scripture and deceive you in languages you don’t understand. As if God would confuse us enough to have to go to other languages to get the real meaning of his eternal word.



This sounds angry and ridiculous. Since when is being accurate trying deceive you? this kind of foolishness needs to be checked. English is a translation of the text of Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, a translation with a bias towards the 1611 understanding of English Christianity.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
do you agree with him?

when he says "Fifthly they believe these different translations of the word Hell: they teach that English Bible versions have falsely used the word Hell for Sheol, Gehenna, Hades, people will take these words from other languages and use them to describe totally different places, people will say oh Sheol just means the grave for instance, Sheol is just a grave, you go to the grave. I guess they use this to believe in annihilation or soul sleep. Then they will take the word Gehenna and say that when the Bible uses Gehenna that means it isn’t really talking about hell, just a place in Jerusalem.

Sixthly (building on the fifth point) they use different translations like Greek and Hebrew to explain away words like eternal, they lie and say it doesn’t really mean eternal. It is easy to deceive people in other languages that they don’t know about. Catholic Church used Latin for hundreds of years, nobody could understand it. Anytime someone says we need to go back to the Greek, Latin or Hebrew for something, that is a red flag, this person is trying to change the meaning of scripture and deceive you in languages you don’t understand. As if God would confuse us enough to have to go to other languages to get the real meaning of his eternal word.



This sounds angry and ridiculous. Since when is being accurate trying deceive you? this kind of foolishness needs to be checked. English is a translation of the text of Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, a translation with a bias towards the 1611 understanding of English Christianity.

No, lol, I don't agree with everything he says. It sounds to me like he is KJVonly, which is a pretty poor position to take.

But I don't see it as presented in an angry fashion.

I almost responded to it but I had so much on my hands at the time it just didn't warrant a response.

There are parts of it that I would be in agreement with. And please don't ask me to point out what that would be, lol, I am about done for the day.

God bless.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?

We can't note the context unless you actually provide what Scripture you are referring to.

Where are the two clean and one unclean animals in Matthew 25?


God bless.
 
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
12,411
3,707
70
Franklin, Tennessee
✟221,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I would like to add to the question, "Did you, Jipsah, have life before being born again?"
I was certainly vertical and breathing, beating heart, the whole works.

Second question: are you a vampire? lol
No. You?

Would you mind explaining why you are a "Blood Drinker?"
23For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: 24And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. 25After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

Any questions?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
do you agree with him?
when he says "Fifthly they believe these different translations of the word Hell: they teach that English Bible versions have falsely used the word Hell for Sheol, Gehenna, Hades, people will take these words from other languages and use them to describe totally different places, people will say oh Sheol just means the grave for instance, Sheol is just a grave, you go to the grave. I guess they use this to believe in annihilation or soul sleep. Then they will take the word Gehenna and say that when the Bible uses Gehenna that means it isn’t really talking about hell, just a place in Jerusalem.
Sixthly (building on the fifth point) they use different translations like Greek and Hebrew to explain away words like eternal, they lie and say it doesn’t really mean eternal. It is easy to deceive people in other languages that they don’t know about. Catholic Church used Latin for hundreds of years, nobody could understand it. Anytime someone says we need to go back to the Greek, Latin or Hebrew for something, that is a red flag, this person is trying to change the meaning of scripture and deceive you in languages you don’t understand. As if God would confuse us enough to have to go to other languages to get the real meaning of his eternal word.
This sounds angry and ridiculous. Since when is being accurate trying deceive you? this kind of foolishness needs to be checked. English is a translation of the text of Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, a translation with a bias towards the 1611 understanding of English Christianity.
I'm not sure who is saying what to whom and why but here is what I have learned about "Hell" in the Bible and yes it is there.
My ¢¢ Below are quotes from three Jewish sources; the 1917 Jewish Encyclopedia, 1972 Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud. Which to date have not been, and I am convinced cannot be, refuted.
= = = = =
…..It is very enticing to claim that the Christian concept of "Hell" was somehow derived from Dante's 14th century writing “Inferno,” or some later writing. But according to these three sources, at least 16 centuries before Dante even scribbled one line, among the יהודים/Yehudim/ιουδαιων/Youdaion/Jews in Israel, before and during the time of Jesus, there was a significant belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom. Sheol and gehinnom are written Hades and Gehenna, respectively, in both the 225 BC LXX and the NT. As can be seen by the citations in this post The Jews later called both Sheol/Hades, and Ge Hinnom/Gehenna, “Hell."
…..There were different factions within Judaism; Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes etc. and different beliefs about resurrection, hell etc. These differing beliefs do not disprove anything in this post.

[1]1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the sons of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). … the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a);[“Soon” in this paragraph would be about 700 BC +/-, DA]
Note: This is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT any assumed/alleged bias of “modern” Christian translators. DA
…..This refutes the false narrative that the eleven [11] times Jesus mentioned “Gehenna” He was referring to the valley of GeHinnom/Gehenna where trash and bodies were supposedly always burning.

”(I)n general …sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai [30 BC-90 AD] wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell(B.M. 83b).
“But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab [Talmud]. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]
“… heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b).[Talmud] “When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [שאול/Sheol] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; [Talmud] comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch [x. 6, xci. 9, etal] also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according toIsa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b)[Talmud].

Link: Jewish Encyclopedia Online
Note, scripture references are highlighted in blue.
= = = = = = = = = =

[2]1972 Encyclopedia Judaica:
Gehinnom (Heb. גֵּי בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּי בְנֵי הִנֹּם, גֵּיא בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּיא הִנֹּם; Gr. Γέεννα; "Valley of Ben-Hinnom, Valley of [the Son (s) of] Hinnom," Gehenna), a valley south of Jerusalem on one of the borders between the territories of Judah and Benjamin, between the Valley of *Rephaim and *En-rogel (Josh. 15:8; 18:16). It is identified with Wadi er-Rababi.
…..During the time of the Monarchy,
Gehinnom, at a place called Topheth, was the site of a cult which involved the burning of children (II Kings 23:10; Jer. 7:31; 32:35 et al.; ). Jeremiah repeatedly condemned this cult and predicted that on its account Topheth and the Valley of the Son of Hinnom would be called the Valley of the "Slaughter" (Jer. 19:5–6).
In Judaism the name Gehinnom is generally used as an appellation of the place of torment reserved for the wicked after death. The New Testament used the Greek form Gehenna in the same sense.
Link:
Gehinnom
http://www.jevzajcg.me/enciklopedia/Encyclopaedia Judaica, v. 07 (Fey-Gor).pdf
= = = = = = = = = =

[3]Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.
The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [i.e. followers of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]:
"And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written[Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more.
Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."
Link: Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
When Jesus taught e.g.,
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41
• "these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "the fire of hell [Γέεννα/gehenna] where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, 3 times Mark 9:43-48"
• "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6 [A fate worse than death. DA]
• “Not everyone who says to me Lord, Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven. …And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24 [A fate worse than death]
• “But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.” Luke 10:12
[A fate worse than death. DA]
…..These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned a then existing significant Jewish view of eternal hell, c.f. Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and Talmud, supra.
In Matt. 18:6, 26:24 and Luk 10:12, see above, Jesus teaches there is a punishment worse than death or nonexistence.
…..A punishment worse than death, without mercy, is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.

Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Or
how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. [A fate worse than death. DA]
…..how much sorer punishment,””Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord,””It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” these deprecations certainly do not sound like everyone will be saved, no matter what.
…..Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He intended to say “eternal death,” in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment/aionios kolasis.
….The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, see Acts of the Apostles 23:8. They knew that everybody died; rich, poor; young, old; good, bad; men, women; children, infants; sick, healthy, and knew that it was permanent and often it did not involve punishment.
When Jesus taught, e.g., “eternal punishment” the Sadducees would not have understood it as simply death, it very likely would have meant something worse to them.
…..Re: Matt 25:46 concerning “punishment” one early church father wrote,

“Then these reap no advantage from their punishment, as it seems: moreover, I would say that they are not punished unless they are conscious of the punishment.” Justin Martyr [A.D. 110-165.] Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 4
…..Jesus attended Temple and synagogues for about 25 years +/-. He undoubtedly knew what the Jews believed about the fate of the unrighteous. He opposed the Jewish leaders many times, If the Jewish teaching on hell was wrong, why wouldn’t Jesus tell them there was no hell, no eternal punishment etc? Why would Jesus teach “eternal punishment,” etc. to Jews who believed, e.g.
"The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" ([Judith xvi:17]Judith xvi. 17).
Link: Judith, CHAPTER 16
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Some misguided folks argue that the 11 or so times that Jesus mentioned "Gehenna" He was supposedly talking about an ever burning trash dump in the valley of Gehenna just outside Jerusalem where trash and even bodies were supposedly continuously burned. It never happened.
The traditional explanation that a burning rubbish heap in the Valley of Hinnom south of Jerusalem gave rise to the idea of a fiery Gehenna of judgment is attributed to Rabbi David Kimhi's commentary on Psalm 27:13 (ca. A.D. 1200). He maintained that in this loathsome valley fires were kept burning perpetually to consume the filth and cadavers thrown into it. However, Strack and Billerbeck state that there is neither archaeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources (Hermann L. Strack and Paul Billerbeck, Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud and Midrasch, 5 vols. [Munich: Beck, 1922-56], 4:2:1030). Also a more recent author holds a similar view (Lloyd R. Bailey, "Gehenna: The Topography of Hell," Biblical Archeologist 49 [1986]: 189.
Source, Bibliotheca Sacra / July–September 1992
http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/ted...Articles/BSac-NT/Scharen-GenenaSyn-Pt1-BS.htm
…..Note: There is no “archaeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, [that Gehenna was ever used as a garbage dump] in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources” If Gehenna was ever used as a garbage dump there should be broken pottery, tools, utensils, bones, etc. but there is no, zero, none such evidence.
“Gehenna is presented as diametrically opposed to ‘life’: it is better to enter life than to go to Gehenna. . .It is common practice, both in scholarly and less technical works, to associate the description of Gehenna with the supposedly contemporary garbage dump in the valley of Hinnom. This association often leads scholars to emphasize the destructive aspects of the judgment here depicted: fire burns until the object is completely consumed. Two particular problems may be noted in connection with this approach. First, there is no convincing evidence in the primary sources for the existence of a fiery rubbish dump in this location … Secondly, the significant background to this passage more probably lies in Jesus’ allusion to Isaiah 66:24.”
(“The Duration of Divine Judgment in the New Testament” in The Reader Must Understand edited by K. Brower and M. W. Ellion, p. 223, emphasis mine)
G. R. Beasley-Murray in Jesus and the Kingdom of God:
“Ge-Hinnom (Aramaic Ge-hinnam, hence the Greek Geenna), ‘The Valley of Hinnom,’ lay south of Jerusalem, immediately outside its walls. The notion, still referred to by some commentators, that the city’s rubbish was burned in this valley, has no further basis than a statement by the Jewish scholar Kimchi (sic) made about A.D. 1200; it is not attested in any ancient source.” (p. 376n.92)
http://www.btdf.org/forums/topic/20113-the-burning-garbage-dump-of-gehenna-is-a-myth/
Abstract
Miqweh of Second Temple Period. ......Jerusalem City-Dump in the Late Second Temple Period, ZDPV, 119/1 (2003),
The chance discovery of an Early Roman city dump (1st century CE) in Jerusalem has yielded for the first time ever quantitative data on garbage components that introduce us to the mundane daily life Jerusalemites led and the kind of animals that were featured in their diet. Most of the garbage consists of pottery shards, all common tableware, while prestige objects are entirely absent. Other significant garbage components include numerous fragments of cooking ovens, wall plaster, animal bones and plant remains. Of the pottery vessels, cooking pots are the most abundant type.
Most of the refuse turns out to be “household garbage” originating in the domestic areas of the city, while large numbers of cooking pots may point to the presence of pilgrims. Significantly, the faunal assemblage, which is dominated by kosher species and the clear absence of pigs, set Jerusalem during its peak historical period apart from all other contemporaneous Roman urban centers.
...
Excavations near the Temple Mount and within the residential areas have already shown that no waste had accumulated there (Reich and Billig 2000), and thus waste must have been removed, most likely in an organized manner. Recently, the contemporaneous city-dump was identified on the eastern slope of the south-eastern hill of Jerusalem in the form of a thick mantle (up to 10 m, 200,000 m3 ) (Reich and Shukron 2003). The dump is located roughly 100 m outside and south-east of the Temple Mount on the eastern slope of the Kidron Valley (fig. 1), and extends at least 400 m and is 50–70 m wide. Large amounts of pottery and coins date the dump to the Early Roman period (the 1st century BCE and the 1st century CE up to the destruction of the city by the Romans in 70 CE). A preliminary study of the garbage (Bouchnik, Bar-Oz and Reich 2004; Bouchnik et al. 2005) showed the presence of animal bones.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...udy_of_the_City-Dump_of_Early_Roman_Jerusalem
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,498
136
✟16,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I was certainly vertical and breathing, beating heart, the whole works.

Not entirely the "whole works:"


Ephesians 2:1
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

Colossians 2:13
And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;


You had no life.

You were, according to the Bible—dead.



Nope.

Not a cannibal, either, as the early Church was charged with being.


23For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: 24And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. 25After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

Any questions?

Yes: how is it that you use a euphemism for belief in Christ yet don't seem to understand the Biblical significance in a broader understanding of death?


John 6:47-53
King James Version

47 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.

48 I am that bread of life.

49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.

50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.



So I will ask you again: did you have life before you were born again?


God bless.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
We can't note the context unless you actually provide what Scripture you are referring to.

Where are the two clean and one unclean animals in Matthew 25?


God bless.

Focus Lion: we are speaking of the one single passage of Scripture regarding "everlasting punishment".

Matthew 25:46
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Focus Lion: we are speaking of the one single passage of Scripture regarding "everlasting punishment".

Matthew 25:46

Take 6 =

Everlasting punishment

Search = "everlasting punishment"


Results = 1 verse found (Matt. 25:46)

The five (5) qualifications for aionios kolasis/ everlasting punishment according to the Master of reconciliation =

1.________________?

2.________________?

3.________________?

4.________________?

5.________________?

You will also note the context.

1. Why pure virgins? (5 wise & 5 unwise), but virgins!

2. Why two clean animals rather than 1 clean and 1 unclean?
 
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
12,411
3,707
70
Franklin, Tennessee
✟221,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes: how is it that you use a euphemism for belief in Christ yet don't seem to understand the Biblical significance in a broader understanding of death?
What I see is your lot "exlaining away" any Scripture that endangers one of your doctrines.

Dead? Nah, doesn't really mean dead. Everybody lives forever. Satan got it right, 'we shall not surely die'.

Ditto "destroy in hell". Doesn't really mean destroy, it's not even possible for God to literally destroy anyone, because they have to live forever to be tortured.

Body and Blood? Nah, He didn't really mean that, because Everybody Knows the Eucharist is just a sip and a nibble to remember Him by. No Body or Blood there to be discerned, St. Paul just got it wrong.

Net effect is you change the Scripture to fit your doctrines. Then again, my bet is you'll take the most impenetrable bit of wild symbolism from the Revelation and declare that you take it literally. Right? The Bible has to be filtered through your doctrinal presuppositions. What passes muster as Good Baptist Doctrine is let stand, and what doesn't has to have a new and acceptable meaning assigned to it. Esasiest way to do that is simply phase shift it 180 degrees, so that A suddenly becomes !A, and your doctrine soldiers on unhindered by the Holy Writ.

BTW, I'm still a Blood drinker. Feel free to enjoy your annual sip of Welchade.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FineLinen
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,589
731
56
Ohio US
✟150,421.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In physical death the spirit departs from the body.

My point is their soul is still alive. No one has been thrown into the LOF at this time. One is either on one side of the gulf or the other. Common sense alone tells us that no one is thrown in only to be pulled back out for the final judgement only to be thrown back in. That's utter nonsense. So anyone that has died in the flesh has not yet suffered the second death.

Being thrown into the Lake of Fire is the Second Death:
Exactly, that's my point. It is the second "death" The first is the death of the flesh.

It is because you have no clue as to what it means to be either alive or dead in a Biblical Context that you make such ridiculous statements.
Spiritually dead or alive just means at that point in time. Someone can be spiritually dead now meaning if they haven't repented and accepted Christ they will suffer the second death. but when they come to know Christ, they have life spiritually speaking. And vice versa. There is such a thing as apostasy, etc. But regardless of that fact, this has nothing to do with the second death in the LOF. That is final.


Show me the verse that says the Lake of Fire passes away.

Do we really have to have God spell it out for us?

Revelation 20:14 "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

Revelation 21:1 "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea." The Lake of Fire is part of that equation. Again, do you really need it spelled out that everything will be passed away and everything new?

The wicked will be turned to stubble and ashes period. That's what a fire does.


As I said, if people want to believe that we will have a new heaven and earth which the old LOF still burning with people inside it for an eternity that's between them and God.

God doesn't even want people to die, he has no pleasure in "that' yet many believe he would do this. Oh well, I guess we'll find out....
 
Upvote 0

Lazarus Short

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2016
2,934
3,009
74
Independence, Missouri, USA
✟294,142.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The wicked will be turned to stubble and ashes period. That's what a fire does.

As I said, if people want to believe that we will have a new heaven and earth which the old LOF still burning with people inside it for an eternity that's between them and God.

God doesn't even want people to die, he has no pleasure in "that' yet many believe he would do this. Oh well, I guess we'll find out....

Pardon me, but if the wicked are burned to stubble and ashes, they still count as being dead. OTOH, the Scriptures state that there will be no more death, and that death is destroyed. BTW, without the dead, there can be no Death. (Revelation 21:4, I Corinthians 15:26) God boasts through Paul, "O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?" (I Corinthians 15:55, KJV) Infernalism and Annihilationism do not explain these verses well, but UR does.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,589
731
56
Ohio US
✟150,421.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
OTOH, the Scriptures state that there will be no more death, and that death is destroyed.

Again, a fire consumes. Once the wicked are turned to stubble and ashes, that's it. Of course there is no more death at that point in the end. There's nothing left to die.

The problem with ECT and UR is that neither of you believe Christ's own words that the LOF is the second "death" You can continue to spin your doctrines but it still won't change the meaning of the word "death" and the fact that the wages of sin is just that -death.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Again, a fire consumes. Once the wicked are turned to stubble and ashes, that's it. Of course there is no more death at that point in the end. There's nothing left to die.
The problem with ECT and UR is that neither of you believe Christ's own words that the LOF is the second "death" You can continue to spin your doctrines but it still won't change the meaning of the word "death" and the fact that the wages of sin is just that -death
.
Was Jesus lying in this verse?
EOB Matthew:25:46 When he will answer them, saying: ‘Amen, I tell you: as much as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ 46 These [ones on the left] will go away into eternal [αἰώνιος/aionios] punishment, [κόλασις/kolasis] but the righteous into eternal [αἰώνιος/aionios] life.”
Greek has been the language of the Eastern Greek Orthodox church since its inception, 2000 years ago +/-. Note, the native Greek speaking Eastern Orthodox Greek scholars, translators of the EOB, translated “aionios,” in Matt 25:46, as “eternal,” NOT “age.”
Who is better qualified than the team of native Greek speaking scholars, translators of the Eastern Greek Orthodox Bible [EOB], quoted above and below, to know the correct translation of the Greek in the N.T.?
Link to EOB online:
The New Testament ( The Eastern-Greek Orthodox Bible) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
…..The Greek word “kolasis” occurs only twice in the N.T., 1st occurrence Matt 25:46, above, and the 2nd occurrence 1 John 4:18., below.

EOB 1 John 4:18 There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear, because fear is connected with punishment.[κόλασις/kolasis] But the one who fears is not yet perfect in love.
In the EOB the Greek word “kolasis” is translated “punishment” in both Matt 25:46 and 1 John 4:18. Some mis/uninformed folks claim “kolasis” really means “prune” or “correction.” However, that is an etymological fallacy. According to the EOB Greek scholars “kolasis” means “punishment.”
Note: in 1 John 4:18 there is no correction, the one with “kolasis” is not made perfect. Thus “kolasis” does not/cannot mean “correction.”
…..It is understood that modern Greek differs from koine Greek but I am confident that the Greek speaking EOB scholars, backed up by 2000 years +/- of Greek scholarship, are competent enough to know the correct translation of obsolete words which may have changed in meaning or are no longer in use and to translate them correctly. Just as modern scholars know the meaning of obsolete words which occur in the KJV and to define them correctly.
 
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
12,411
3,707
70
Franklin, Tennessee
✟221,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Was Jesus lying in this verse?
Dunno, was He lying in this one? "Take, eat; this is my body." (You like that "you think Jesus was lying?' schtick a lot, I just thought I'd try some on you.)
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,589
731
56
Ohio US
✟150,421.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
EOB Matthew:25:46 When he will answer them, saying: ‘Amen, I tell you: as much as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ 46 These [ones on the left] will go away into eternal [αἰώνιος/aionios] punishment, [κόλασις/kolasis] but the righteous into eternal [αἰώνιος/aionios] life.”

Death is the eternal punishment. There's no coming back from that. That's why it's called the second "death".

II Thessalonians 1:9 "Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;"

Everyone glosses over Christ's own words that the LOF is the second death. This points to his teaching in Matthew 10:28. He himself is providing a second witness to his own teaching. If one spins Matthew 10:28, he completely makes it clear that the LOF is the second death.

It's pretty clear throughout the entire word that the wicked will perish/die but the righteous will obtain eternal life.

If people want to see different things into death, destruction, perish -that they're only in a "ruined" state etc that's on them. But in the context of the entire word and Christ's teachings at the end, it's clear the wicked are destroyed, turned to stubble and ashes in the LOF. That's why it can be said that death is destroyed. It's all gone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lazarus Short

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2016
2,934
3,009
74
Independence, Missouri, USA
✟294,142.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Again, a fire consumes. Once the wicked are turned to stubble and ashes, that's it. Of course there is no more death at that point in the end. There's nothing left to die.

The problem with ECT and UR is that neither of you believe Christ's own words that the LOF is the second "death" You can continue to spin your doctrines but it still won't change the meaning of the word "death" and the fact that the wages of sin is just that -death.

If no one dies anymore, there is still death. Those who have died and returned to dust can be counted as dead, even if forgotten. Those who die in fires, same story. No more death is fine as far as it goes, but if anyone is still dead and/or in "hell" then Death is still a thing. For death to be a thing, you must have the dead. As I've said before, if God asks of Death and the Grave where their sting and victory are, they can point to non-empty graves. But - God does not make such challenge in vain, for it is just a rhetorical way of stating that Death and the Grave have NOTHING. This is where Annihilation founders.
 
Upvote 0