I have absolultly no bone to pick with you. You are free to exercise your choice of religion just as I am.
However.....when you openly make the comments you have you open the door for others who do not think as you do to say what they believe.
I DO NOT follow the directions of men or Popes or religion. I am a Bible literalist. What the Bible says is what I repeat!
Anyone is free to ignore what it says and what I repeat from its pages.
Now.....having said that, there is NO Scriptures in the Word of God which say that Mary is to be venerated, worshipped or to be considered above or better than any other person.!!!
Mary was just a person God used for His purposes. Because of certain misunderstandings about Mary, it is important to note that she was not chosen because she was more holy than other people. The angel’s address to her as “highly favored” and “blessed” is a reference to the uniqueness of her pending task, not to any level of virtuousness she had attained.
Mary was surely a godly woman, but that is not the point. Gabriel’s emphasis was on her privilege, not her piety. She had “found favor with God” (verse 30), but that says more about God’s goodness than Mary’s.
When we actually READ the Bible, we can see that the angel gives Mary a number of high compliments, BUT, nothing indicates that she is worthy of worship, or veneration
I’ve got to stop you right there. I do not worship or adore the Blessed Virgin Mary, for only God is worthy of worship and adoration. I do however venerate her, indeed moreso than anyone else, but humans can be worthy of veneration - indeed, the love we have for our own family members constitutes veneration. The admiration some people have for famous people is a form of veneration. For my part, I believe, as did the early church, that the Theotokos, being the Mother of God, is worthy of the greatest veneration.
let alone being an intercessor between
Jesus Christ and His followers, or a Co-Redemptrix,
Minor fact check: it is not Roman Catholic doctrine that St. Mary is the co-redemptrix. There is a group pushing for this, which they call the “Fifth Dogma”, but it has disturbing origins, having originated with Ida Peerdeman, a Dutch lady who described a Marian apparition whose behaviors were strange, threatening and inconsistent with everything we know about the loving nature of the Theotokos, and her “private revelations” have consistently been rejected by the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith as unworthy of belief.
I am not Roman Catholic however, so if they did declare St. Mary to be co-redemptrix, while I would be extremely upset, for as I see it this would be akin to the heresy of the Collyridians, it would not affect me personally.
sinless for her entire life, or given any other honor aside from being God's chosen vessel for the purpose of the Son of God being made flesh and blood.
Firstly, the Son of God is God, just as our Heavenly Father is God and the Holy Spirit is God. And it is because God chose her to be His mother (let us not demean maternity with a phrase like “chosen vessel” - she was the mother of the incarnate Word of God, nothing less), that she is worthy of extreme veneration. In venerating her, however, we do not deny that Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son and Word of God, was her Savior as much as he was our Savior. This view is also held by the Roman Catholics.
Now, all of that stuff mentioned above is Catholic Denomination teaching
No its not. You might consider reading the Catechism of the Catholic Church before asserting what is or is not Roman Catholic doctrine. Meanwhile I would be happy to send you the catechism of my church for purposes of comparison, since there are many Roman Catholic beliefs, such as Papal infallibility, created grace, absolute divine simplicity, purgatory and indulgences, to name just a few, which I do not share.
Again, with all respect, you are free to believe it and accept it and do it, but you can not do it and say that it comes from BIBLICAL directions.
What I actually believe, as opposed to what you apparently think I believe, under the misguided assumption that I am Roman Catholic, is solidly scriptural and in accord with the teachings of the Early Church, the Orthodox churches and the early Protestants.
God chose Mary to be the mother of the Messiah for several reasons........
1. Mary was of the right lineage.
2. Mary was engaged to a man whose heritage would require him to visit Bethlehem at just the right time.
3. Mary was a virgin.
4. Mary was from Nazareth.
All true. Also the fact that she was more obedient to God than anyone else doubtless played a major role.
Now for some clarifications:
I am not a member of the Roman Catholic Church, and in venerating the our glorious Lady Theotokos and Ever Virgin Mary, I am rather following the practices of the early Church, the Eastern Orthodox, the Oriental Orthodox, and the first Protestants (the proto-Moravians under St. Jan Hus and St. Jerome of Prague, Martin Luther and the early Lutherans, especially the Lutherans of the Church of Sweden, and the early Anglicans), which are preserved to this day by High Church Anglicans, and also by Evangelical Catholic Lutherans such as one finds in the Missouri Synod, the Lutheran Church of Canada, and the Mission Province of the Church of Sweden (and a related reform movement in the Church of Norway).
So I don’t want to hear about what doctrines the Roman Catholic gets wrong, because I am not a Roman Catholic, although I will say this: I do feel sorry for them, because people on this forum are constantly and relentlessly criticizing them, often on baseless grounds. For example, in this thread you made at least two unwarranted accusations against the Roman Catholic church, insofar as it is not the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic church that Mary is the co-redemptrix, whereas it is the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic church that God alone is worthy of worship and adoration.