Democrat urges "call to arms" against Supreme Court

KCfromNC · May 13, 2022

Aldebaran said:
Since the democrats are now in control of government

Not the judicial branch, that's for sure.

wing2000 · May 13, 2022

Aldebaran said:
Uh huh. Right.
If Trump has announced a "call to arms" on Jan. 6th, none of his haters would give him the benefit of the doubt that he was just speaking figuratively. He said, "we need to fight like hell", and they didn't take that as figurative. But now that it's a black lesbian liberal mayor in Chicago (making her beyond criticism from the non-woke), and the excuses are suddenly being made that it was only "figurative".

LOL. It doesn't take much to trigger the pearl clutching.
One text from -- in your revealing words -- "a black lesbian liberal mayor in Chicago."

And then you compare that text to a former POTUS who for four plus years used language intended to incite people to violence.

cow451 · May 13, 2022

Valletta said:
It is a threat, a threat to riot, just as I claimed. So in this case we need the Justice Department to put the photos of every protester at the residences of the Supreme Court justices out there so they can be arrested and interrogated. If they didn't break the law the charges will be dropped.

A threat to riot….. a promise to protest. Big diff.

cow451 · May 13, 2022

Aldebaran said:
How is rioting not a threat? We've all seen what damage rioters cause. Those threatening to riot now are fully aware of it as well. They know that making terroristic threats is the way to get what they want.

A terroristic threat has to be specific. A threat to protest isn’t a terroristic threat.

cow451 · May 13, 2022

Aldebaran said:
Since the justices themselves would have a good vantage point to see the protesters (who obviously want to be seen), I hope the justices are taking lots of photos in case anything happens. Get it all recorded.
But if they're all wearing masks as they were during the 2020 riots....

I think there are plenty of photos being taken, LOL.

cow451 · May 13, 2022

Aldebaran said:
Then who would the rioters riot against, if not the justices? And if not against the justices, why are they at the justices' homes?

Who is threatening to riot?

ottawak · May 13, 2022

cow451 said:
Who is threatening to riot?

The very existence of The Left is a threat to riot. After all, they rioted in 2020 without provocation, burned several major cities entirely to the ground, murdered hundreds and were let off scot free by their liberal cronies in the justice system.

cow451 · May 13, 2022

Aldebaran said:
Uh huh. Right.
If Trump has announced a "call to arms" on Jan. 6th, none of his haters would give him the benefit of the doubt that he was just speaking figuratively. He said, "we need to fight like hell", and they didn't take that as figurative. But now that it's a black lesbian liberal mayor in Chicago (making her beyond criticism from the non-woke), and the excuses are suddenly being made that it was only "figurative".

Mr. Trump isn’t involved in this series of demonstrations and is irrelevant.

Valletta · May 13, 2022

cow451 said:
A threat to riot….. a promise to protest. Big diff.

Once the word "riot" was used it became extremely difficult to try and defend.

cow451 · May 13, 2022

Valletta said:
Once the word "riot" was used it became extremely difficult to try and defend.

Pfffttt. Puleeeze.

Aldebaran · May 13, 2022

KCfromNC said:
Not the judicial branch, that's for sure.

Good! Divided government keeps things in check.

Aldebaran · May 13, 2022

wing2000 said:
LOL. It doesn't take much to trigger the pearl clutching.
One text from -- in your revealing words -- "a black lesbian liberal mayor in Chicago."

And then you compare that text to a former POTUS who for four plus years used language intended to incite people to violence.

I didn't know that pointing out all the woke aspects of the mayor that those on her side use as a way to shield her (and others like her) from criticism was an incitement of violence.
Oh wait, now I understand! You're trying to distract from her encouraging people to take up arms against the Supreme Court. Clever!

Aldebaran · May 13, 2022

Valletta said:
Once the word "riot" was used it became extremely difficult to try and defend.

Especially in light of recent events.

cow451 · May 14, 2022

Many demonstrations apparently happening today. This pic from “Bans off Our Bodies” rally in Knoxville TN

Democrat urges "call to arms" against Supreme Court

Regular Member

E pluribus unum

Standing with Ukraine.

Standing with Ukraine.

Standing with Ukraine.

Standing with Ukraine.

Well-Known Member

Standing with Ukraine.

Well-Known Member

Standing with Ukraine.

NCC-1701-A

NCC-1701-A

NCC-1701-A

Standing with Ukraine.

Similar threads