Insect diversity falsifies the flood myth

euphoric

He hates these cans!!
Jun 22, 2002
480
5
47
Visit site
✟8,271.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
4th April 2003 at 01:04 AM look said this in Post #40

What is your problem?

My problem is the fact that you are avoiding the question that was asked in the OP and yet you have the temerity to accuse the original poster of trolling.  The question that was originally asked is one of many that pose a serious problem to the flood story and rather than address it, you are trying to weasel your way out of the question. 

So one more time, how did these insects which have very strict dietary and environmental requirements survive a global flood?

-brett
 
Upvote 0

look

A New Species of Man®
Mar 15, 2003
814
9
68
Daytona Beach, Florida
Visit site
✟8,610.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
4th April 2003 at 03:36 PM Zadok001 said this in Post #42

*bumpity bumpity bump*

Anyone actually want to answer the OP? Anyone?
Actually the 'OP' could be used to show that the Ark need not carry all of the different species, including INSECTS. I will explain.

While frum's references were acceptable for today's insect kingdom, the citations did not prove an important part of the question of how the insects survived the flood. It is, for most of you, well known that "speciation" does occur. The evolution scientists use it to show that evolution does occur. However, the same example can be used to argue that the ark did not need to carry all of these different species on board. With that in mind, it is not implausable to consider that there had to be some insect stowaways on that ship, from which all of today's insects decended from. Maybe God intended some of the insects to dispose of 12 tons of daily animal excrement, eh?

Another theory I can advance is that some of the bugs that lived underground survived via hibernation. It is known that some ant queens and also wasp queens can hibernate for up to one year. That of course doesn't account for all of the flying insects. Rest assured, there are different ways these insects survived the global flood and expanded to the present insect kingdom.

Take that, Zadok...:p Just kidding...
 
Upvote 0

troodon

Be wise and be smart
Dec 16, 2002
1,698
58
39
University of Iowa
Visit site
✟17,147.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
4th April 2003 at 08:14 PM look said this in Post #45

Another theory I can advance is that some of the bugs that lived underground survived via hibernation. It is known that some ant queens and also wasp queens can hibernate for up to one year. That of course doesn't account for all of the flying insects. Rest assured, there are different ways these insects survived the global flood and expanded to the present insect kingdom.

Wouldn't all those thousands of feet of water cause too much pressure for anything to live underground?
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Yeah, but remember, those thousands of feet of water were supposed to have crushed all the animals into oil and coal. Hehe, dead bugs. :D

4th April 2003 at 08:20 PM troodon said this in Post #46



Wouldn't all those thousands of feet of water cause too much pressure for anything to live underground?
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
71
✟9,874.00
Faith
Other Religion
4th April 2003 at 11:14 PM look said this in Post #45

Another theory I can advance is that some of the bugs that lived underground survived via hibernation. It is known that some ant queens and also wasp queens can hibernate for up to one year. That of course doesn't account for all of the flying insects. Rest assured, there are different ways these insects survived the global flood and expanded to the present insect kingdom.

Not if this flood was supposed to be cataclysmic enough to responsible for the current mountain ranges.

And troodon brings up the point of water pressure (which, if the mountain ranges were the same as today, would be a pretty big problem).

Either way, your theory has some hoop jumping to do if it is to explain how insects could have hibernated under ground.
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
71
✟9,874.00
Faith
Other Religion
4th April 2003 at 11:24 PM Arikay said this in Post #47

Yeah, but remember, those thousands of feet of water were supposed to have crushed all the animals into oil and coal.

Another good point.

This is why the flood hypothesis was tossed out 200 years ago. There are so many contradicting hypotheses for how things were supposed to have worked during the flood, it is virtually impossible to satisfy the criteria for all of them.

Except, of course, if you start randomly invoking God whenever a flood hypothesis fails.
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Without saying god did it (which goes against literal creation) I have yet to see a flood theory that doesnt contradict itself.

So far, the best Flood Model I have seen is the flood Model that says the flood waters covered Mt Everest. It may have big problems with science, but it has the least amount of creationist contradictions. Although it still has quite a few.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
77
Visit site
✟15,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
Another theory I can advance is that some of the bugs that lived underground survived via hibernation. It is known that some ant queens and also wasp queens can hibernate for up to one year. That of course doesn't account for all of the flying insects. Rest assured, there are different ways these insects survived the global flood and expanded to the present insect kingdom.

Are you up on the current standard YEC nonsense? According the Flood "geologists" several thousand feet of sediment were deposited by this flood. That would put them pretty far underground. Hibernating is one thing. Hibernating while a year long flood deposits thousands of feet of sediment on top of you is something else again.

Here's an experiment for you. Take an ant colony in an aquarium and fill it to the top with water. Put in some floating vegetation for the ants to survive on. See how they are doing in a year. I won't even insist that you put another thousand feet of sand and rocks on top of the ants. I don't think they will survive long, let alone a year.


While frum's references were acceptable for <B>today's</B> insect kingdom, the citations did not prove an important part of the question of how the insects survived the flood. It is, for most of you, well known that "speciation" does occur.

How much diversification will you allow in a few thousand years? Remember there are about 1,000,000 species in thousands of families.&nbsp;Whole families and even orders&nbsp;of insects&nbsp;would be&nbsp;wiped out by a year long global flood, not&nbsp;just&nbsp;species. Can you get from a mosquito to a mayfly by microevolution?&nbsp;&nbsp;That sounds like hypermacro evolution to me.&nbsp;&nbsp;

I do find it amusing when YECs invoke evolution at rates far exceeding those proposed by science to try to salvage the ark myth but it won't help you unless you want to invoke hypermacro evolution and not just hypermicro evolution.

Rest assured that your creationist leaders will conitnure to feed you nonsense that will justify the myth in your mind. That doesn't mean&nbsp;the nonsense you believe&nbsp;has anything to do with science or reality.&nbsp; In fact you non answer is typical of creationist non answers.&nbsp;Make up what you think is&nbsp;a possible way,&nbsp;even though its actually impossible, that a few species might have survived, throw in a little hyperevolution and say the problem is solved when it is not solved in the least.

Rest assured the global flood is a myth.


The Frumious Bandersnatch.
 
Upvote 0

look

A New Species of Man®
Mar 15, 2003
814
9
68
Daytona Beach, Florida
Visit site
✟8,610.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
4th April 2003 at 11:31 PM Arikay said this in Post #50

Without saying god did it (which goes against literal creation) I have yet to see a flood theory that doesnt contradict itself.

So far, the best Flood Model I have seen is the flood Model that says the flood waters covered Mt Everest. It may have big problems with science, but it has the least amount of creationist contradictions. Although it still has quite a few.
OK, let's see...A trick question is in order here. Ready?

How long is a cubit?

Genesis 7: 20. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.

cu•bit
Pronunciation: (kyOO'bit), [key]
—n.
an ancient linear unit based on the length of the forearm, from elbow to the tip of the middle finger, usually from 17 to 21 in. (43 to 53 cm).

For the sake of the arguement, let's round off the cubit to 24". 24"x15 ft.=30 ft. And that was evidently enough to cover the tallest mountain. Now either the spot the ark was built was already high up, or the topgraphy was very different.

BTW, mountian ranges are cause by plates pushing on other plates. There is one range I know of that is in the middle of a plate and that is the Appalachian range. The geologic basement reveals that something has pushed this range upwards. But it should be obvious that the flood did not cause the mountians that we have today. The flood did cause some of the canyons and gorges in existance today.

It seems plausible that before the flood, the mountians were not like they are today. The Bible says the waters were only thirty feet deep, at most (remember, I used 24" for a cubit). The land masses didn't even start drifting
untill "Peleg" was born.

Even you guys know that at one time, the land masses were one big super-continent and it drifted off in different directions to where we are now. Let's look at Genesis 10: 25. And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided;...

Peleg was born aproximately 200 years after the flood. So it was at least 200 years after the flood when the continents started their drift. With this information, it should be easy to visualize the gradual forming of the mountian ranges as the plates started their movements.

That's all folks, It's past my bedtime, so goodnite...
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Your taking the bible out of context. Go read the entire story you will see that its different.

"Gen 7:18__ And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
__
_ Gen 7:19__ And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that [were] under the whole heaven, were covered. "

So as you can see, this makes it sound a bit different than just the flood waters were 30ft deep. (interestingly enough 15 cubits is only half as high as the ark).

Peleg was born aproximately 200 years after the flood. So it was at least 200 years after the flood when the continents started their drift. With this information, it should be easy to visualize the gradual forming of the mountian ranges as the plates started their movements.

You do realize how much brute energy it would take for the techtonic plates to drift apart as much as they did in only 4200 years right?

Lets take a look at this. If mount Everest was basically flat 4200 years ago, and it is now over 5.5 miles high. Lets be as nice as possible here, we know that the continents havent been moving at a high rate of speed for at least 2000 years now. So lets say Mount everest grew from practically nothing to 5.5 miles high in 2200 years. It would have an uplift rate of 13.2 feet a year. Thats a rather amazing rate.

However, if you take the bible completly literal, it says "in his day" so if the continents seperated in a single day, they would have destroyed everything.

Another problem is the Marsupial problem and the fossil record problem. If it was 200 years after the flood before the continents seperated, then we should see Marsupials in other places than Australia (at least bones). It also doesnt explain how the fossil record got sorted the way it is.









4th April 2003 at 10:09 PM look said this in Post #52

OK, let's see...A trick question is in order here. Ready?

How long is a cubit?

Genesis 7: 20. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.

cu•bit
Pronunciation: (kyOO'bit), [key]
—n.
an ancient linear unit based on the length of the forearm, from elbow to the tip of the middle finger, usually from 17 to 21 in. (43 to 53 cm).

For the sake of the arguement, let's round off the cubit to 24". 24"x15 ft.=30 ft. And that was evidently enough to cover the tallest mountain. Now either the spot the ark was built was already high up, or the topgraphy was very different.

BTW, mountian ranges are cause by plates pushing on other plates. There is one range I know of that is in the middle of a plate and that is the Appalachian range. The geologic basement reveals that something has pushed this range upwards. But it should be obvious that the flood did not cause the mountians that we have today. The flood did cause some of the canyons and gorges in existance today.

It seems plausible that before the flood, the mountians were not like they are today. The Bible says the waters were only thirty feet deep, at most (remember, I used 24" for a cubit). The land masses didn't even start drifting
untill "Peleg" was born.

Even you guys know that at one time, the land masses were one big super-continent and it drifted off in different directions to where we are now. Let's look at Genesis 10: 25. And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided;...

Peleg was born aproximately 200 years after the flood. So it was at least 200 years after the flood when the continents started their drift. With this information, it should be easy to visualize the gradual forming of the mountian ranges as the plates started their movements.

That's all folks, It's past my bedtime, we lose one hour tonite, I think, so goodnite...
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
77
Visit site
✟15,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
It seems plausible that before the flood, the mountians were not like they are today. The Bible says the waters were only thirty feet deep, at most (remember, I used 24" for a cubit). The land masses didn't even start drifting
untill "Peleg" was born.

Look, water 30 feet deep wouldn't even float the ark. It supposedly had a height of 30 cubits(Genesis 6:15).&nbsp; Genesis 7:19 says all the high hill were covered and 7:20 says 15 cubits upward did the water prevail and the mountains were covered. Do you think the ancient Hebrews thought that hills 30 feet high were mountains? However, even water only 30 feet deep over the entire earth would kill off many families of insects forever.

AiG and ICR and all the other current YEC organization claim that thousands of feet of sediment all over the world were deposited by the flood. Would you please explain how water 30 feet deep deposited 15,000-20,000 feet of sediment?

Even AiG says that the division of the lands in the time of Peleg was political and not an actual geological division of continents. The energy released buy such rapid continental drift would indeed cook the earth to death.&nbsp; However, they do say there were no significant mountains before the flood. They also use the mountains that they say didn't exist before the flood to sort the fossil record but that's another story.

Your&nbsp;supposed answers&nbsp;continue to be&nbsp;typical of creationist non answers to the multitude of falsifications of the ark myth.&nbsp;Make up what you think is&nbsp;a possible way,&nbsp;even though it's actually impossible, that a few species might have survived, throw in a little hyperevolution and say the problem is solved when it is not solved in the least.&nbsp;

The Frumious Bandersnatch
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
5th April 2003 at 05:28 AM Frumious Bandersnatch said this in Post #54&nbsp;

falsifications of the ark myth.&nbsp;

The ark is NOT a myth. It is a well documented historical fact covered in by ancient writtings. There really was a Noah, there really was a ark that Noah used to survive a flood. There really was a flood. It may not have been a world wide flood, it could have just covered the tri country area of Turkey, Iran and Armenia. But no one question that there was a flood.

It is a historical fact, that is a part of written history, it is a part of the geological record. You guys are so hard headed, if you can not be trusted to handle historical facts, then how can&nbsp;you trust you to be accurate with the prehistory&nbsp;when dealing with fossel and other natural records where your data has to be interperted.

http://www.armenianhighland.com/cradle/chronicle100.html
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
77
Visit site
✟15,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
The ark is NOT a myth. It is a well documented historical fact covered in by ancient writtings. There really was a Noah, there really was a ark that Noah used to survive a flood. There really was a flood. It may not have been a world wide flood, it could have just covered the tri country area of Turkey, Iran and Armenia. But no one question that there was a flood.

No one questions that there were many floods in that area in prehistoric times. When I refer to the ark myth I refer to the myth of the worldwide flood of Noah which the Hebrews probably borrowed from Summarian legends that may have been based on a real local flood. The flood of Noah as a local event is not really what&nbsp;I would call a well documented historical event but at least it is not totally &nbsp;impossible and throughly falsified, unlike the global flood. Here is a link to book on the subject that looks interesting though I haven't read it.
http://www.flood-myth.com/index.html
If you want to discuss the local flood of Noah as an allegedly well documented historical event please open another thread. Please don't try to hijack this thread from its original topic which is the fact that insect diversity is one of many falsifications of&nbsp;the myth of a recent worldwide flood.


The Frumious Bandersnatch
 
Upvote 0

Zadok001

Gli alberi hanno orecchie, occhi e denti.
Feb 5, 2003
419
8
Visit site
✟594.00
JohnR7:

Again, this thread is not meant to act as a falsification of your version of the flood events. Don't worry about defending your flood - You AGREE with us, in that a world-wide flood did not occur. We're on the same team on this one, as wierd as that may seem, and I don't think Frumious Bandersnatch, Arikay, or anyone else here would disagree. We're in agreement on the basic tenant of this thread. World-wide Noahic flood is not a factual rendering of historic events.

look:

30 feet of water. The ark was HOW big? Screw 'floated around the world several times,' the thing never even left groud level! You can't float a boat that size in thirty feet of water. You simply cannot do it. Note also that trees are quite often taller than 30 ft. Noah's dove was either incredibly stupid, or just waiting for an olive tree to poke out.

Seeing the problems here?
 
Upvote 0

look

A New Species of Man®
Mar 15, 2003
814
9
68
Daytona Beach, Florida
Visit site
✟8,610.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
5th April 2003 at 08:59 AM Frumious Bandersnatch said this in Post #57



No one questions that there were many floods in that area in prehistoric times. When I refer to the ark myth I refer to the myth of the worldwide flood of Noah which the Hebrews probably borrowed from Summarian legends that may have been based on a real local flood. The flood of Noah as a local event is not really what&nbsp;I would call a well documented historical event but at least it is not totally &nbsp;impossible and throughly falsified, unlike the global flood. Here is a link to book on the subject that looks interesting though I haven't read it.
http://www.flood-myth.com/index.html
If you want to discuss the local flood of Noah as an allegedly well documented historical event please open another thread. Please don't try to hijack this thread from its original topic which is the fact that insect diversity is one of many falsifications of&nbsp;the myth of a recent worldwide flood.


The Frumious Bandersnatch
I, not having access to materials and papers except what is found on the internet, posted this article that briefly summarizes my views on this subject and other related ones, as well.


Could Noah's Ark Hold all the Animals?

One issue that is often raised against Christianity is Noah's Ark and the Flood. Did it really happen? Did the flood really cover the whole world? Is there enough water on earth to cover all the land? Could the ark really hold two of every kind of animal in the world? Though these might be intimidating questions, the answer to each is a resounding, "Yes."

God said to Noah in Genesis 6:14-16, "So make yourself an ark of cypress wood; make rooms in it and coat it with pitch inside and out. This is how you are to build it: The ark is to be 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high. Make a roof for it and finish the ark to within 18 inches of the top. Put a door in the side of the ark and make lower, middle and upper decks" (NIV). According to God's Word, Noah built the ark. Eight people entered it and all humanity died in the ensuing flood.

Did the flood really happen? Yes. Jesus said in Matt. 24:37-39 that the flood happened.(Jesus speaks of His coming as a worldwide event, as in the days of Noah. Ibid.) If you can't trust Jesus, you can't trust anyone. As far as physical evidence goes there are numerous sedimentary deposits world wide which suggest a universal flood. There are countless fossil deposits world wide (For fossilization to occur organisms must be buried rapidly with sediment.). Every major culture has a flood legend. Of over 200 flood legends, 95% say the flood was universal; 70% say survival depended upon a boat; 66% say the wickedness of man was the cause; 88% say there was a favored family; 66% say the remnant was warned; 67% say animals were also saved; 57% say the survivors ended up on a mountain; 35% say birds were sent out; 9% say eight people were saved; and 7% mention a rainbow.

Is there enough water to flood the entire earth? Absolutely! If the earth were perfectly spherical the oceans would cover all the land by more than a mile in depth. The biblical account is that it rained for 40 days and nights in which the floodgates of the heavens were opened up as well as the fountains from the earth (Gen. 7:11;8:2). There is a theory known as the canopy theory that states it had never rained on the earth up to the time of Noah and that a mist watered the plants (Gen. 2:6-6). The theory goes on to state that there may have been a heavy cloud or water vapor layer over the entire earth and that it was this canopy of water that became torrential rains during the flood period.

Did the flood cover all the earth? Yes it did. The depth of the flood waters is described in Gen. 7:19 as covering "all the high mountains under the entire heavens." Also, there are many references in the Bible to it being global: Gen. 6:1,4-5,12,13,17,19;7:4,6,10,19;8:3;9:15. There were 40 days of rain (Gen. 7:12), 110 days of flooding (Gen. 7:24) and 221 more days of draining (Gen. 8:1-5,13-14). That is a total of 371 days of flooding that covered the mountains. That could not be a local flood.

Could the ark really contain all the animals of the world? Again the answer is "Yes." But let's look at the last question in more detail. The ark took about 120 years to build. Noah was 480 years old when he began the work and he had the help of his wife, three sons, and his son's wives. He probably hired local people to help in the construction.

The dimensions of the ark have a ratio of six to one. The Ark was six times longer than it was wide. This is the best ratio for modern ship building. Model stability tests have shown that the design is stable for waves up to 200 feet high and that the ark could have rotated 90 degrees and still righted itself.

The volume of the ark would be 450 feet long by 75 feet wide by 45 feet high. This equals 1,518,750 cubic feet and is comparable to 569 modern railroad boxcars. Therefore each boxcar, by comparison, would be 1,518,750 ÷ 569, or 2,669 cubic feet of space. The average size of an animal on the earth is smaller than a cat. But, just to keep it safe let's consider the average size of an animal to be a sheep. The average double deck stock car holds 240 sheep. The Ark capacity would be about 569 x 240 equaling 136,560 animals of that size. However, that still is not accurate for our needs. Since most birds, reptiles, and amphibians are much smaller, let's double the boxcar capacity for them. Therefore, the boxcars could each hold 480 different kinds of birds, reptiles, amphibians.

Noah had to take two or seven of every kind of animal on the earth. Though it is not really known exactly what is meant by a biblical kind, it is generally considered to be animals that are fertile within their own groups. Any dog can breed with any dog, therefore, dogs are one kind. It would only be necessary to bring representatives of each kind since the parents could produce offspring that would carry the genetic information for all variations within their kind.


Classification . . . . Number of Species . . . . Number of Kinds on the Ark
Mammals . . . . . . . . .3,700 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,700 (a few live in water).
Birds . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,200 (seven pairs according to
Gen. 7:3)
Reptiles. . . . . . . . . . .6,300 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,300
Amphibians. . . . . . . .2,500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,500
Fishes. . . . . . . . . . . .20,600. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .zero
Other marine life . . . 192,605. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .zero
Insects . . . . . . . . . . . 850,000 . . . (Since insects are very small, and a great many could be stored in a small area, calculation would be difficult.)
Total . . . . . . . . . . . .1,072,305 . . . . . . . . . . . . .72,700
The total number of mammals would be 3,700 times two pair which equals 7,400 animals. 7,400 divided by 240 = 31 boxcars used.
Since Gen. 7:3 says to take seven pairs of every bird then the total for birds would be 8,600 times two pair times 7 or 120,400 animals. 120,400 ÷ 480 = 250 boxcars. The reptiles and amphibians would be 6,300 plus 2,500 or 8,800. 8,800 times two pair equals 17,600 animals. 17,600 divided by 480 = 37 boxcars.

The total number of boxcars used would be 318 with a total number of animals at 145,400. There would be 251 boxcars left over. That means that only 56% of the ark would be used for storing the animals. Obviously, then, the rest of the space would be used for food for the people and animals and sleeping quarters. In addition, considering that insects are extremely small, it is easily conceivable that they could be housed in part of the remaining space.

It should also be considered that many animals can hibernate. Additionally, predators and prey have been known to habitat peacefully together during situations of stress like fire, flood, or earthquake. In the Ark, normal animal behavior would probably have been different from normal. Specialists in animal behavior have noted that animals can sense danger and have often migrated to escape it. Perhaps God used their migratory instincts to get them to the Ark.

Though this is only a brief analysis, it should present enough evidence that the Ark account is certainly within the realm of possibility.


It should be noted that the animals and insects were not carnivorous. It is biblical record that God gave the command to eat meat after the flood. After all, the pre-flood world was gone. This is what He told man and all life to eat before and after the flood;

Genesis 1: 29. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.


Then at the time of the flood, Noah had to load the barge, er, I mean the ark.

Genesis 6: 21. And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and thou shalt gather it to thee; and it shall be for food for thee, and for them.


Then, after the flood, God told them that He has given meat for food as the green herb was for food.

Genesis 9: 3. Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
77
Visit site
✟15,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
Look

What does all that nonsense have to do with insects surviving the flood? Do you think they were on the ark? Do you think Noah had a running stream for the mayflies and living milkweeds for the Monarch butterflies and living plant species for the other insects that require specific plants and a forest complete with its dirt for the periodical cicadas and maybe some huge ant colonies and wasps and bees and housing for&nbsp;a few&nbsp;hundred thousand species of beetles?

The issue with insects is not space. It is the care required to maintain thousands of different "kinds" on a wooden boat in a big flood. Our local zoo has an insect house. It requires quite a bit of care and feeding to take care of the insects because so many have specific requirements for habitat and environment. Have you ever been to a butterfly house? I really don't think Noah had one on board.

The Frumious Bandersnatch
 
Upvote 0