The bible context is okay, the original word that is translated "hypocrite" had a deeper meaning than today, and perhaps much more offensive.
G5273 - hypokritēs - Strong's Greek Lexicon (kjv)
It's more of an application issue, over thinking it tends to result in no application.
First, saying one thing and then not being able to live up to what you say is a rather common human thing. You can try to do better in the future or lower the bar for an easy pass. Your pick.
Second, you say the Church rejects LGBT folks but accepts divorced people. But that's not quite the whole story. While some will not only reject such people, and even claim that 'God hates [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]', that is not the position of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church has a very nuanced position that accepts people with same sex attractions while considering homosexual acts to be sinful. Sort of a 'love the sinner but hate the sin' approach. And at the same time
We won't go into the hypocrisy of that bizarre charade for the sake of holding the line she once held without the charade . .but it seems the Catholic church is still the only one trying to hold the line here.the Catholic Church resists divorce and remarriage. In fact one reason Catholics leave is that they have divorced and they can't remarry as Catholics if their first marriages have not been found null from the beginning.
Which is Biblical. . .We allow divorced people to be Catholics and receive communion if they do not remarry or engage in sinful sexual acts. We allow people with same sex attraction to be Catholics and to receive communion. They are expected to not engage in sinful sexual acts. For that matter, we do not consider attractions to even be sin, while some Protestants will reject them for even having the inclination.
(OK, pope Francis has said ambiguous things pro and con to confuse people, but he hasn't managed just yet to change the teaching.)
So it's no blind spot for all of us, who accept divorced people and LGBT people but expect both of them to nonetheless live moral lives. All are welcome, but all must be changed by their conversion, and even daily reconversions, to Christ.
What did Jesus say to the woman caught in adultery? Go and sin more carefully? What do flavors of the Church say? Some just forgot what Jesus said. That's not just hypocrisy but apostasy by degrees. Either hating the sinners and the sin OR hating the sinners by loving the sin.
The church does not accept LGBT folks in church due to the sentiment "from the beginning it was not so"
The church does accept divorced people and even allows them to remarry, even though Jesus said remarrying equals adultery "because from the beginning it was not so"
Should the church be concerned about the acceptance of this, and similar hypocrisies? How does God tend to respond to hypocrisy when quoted directly in the bible?
Once you have one blind spot, many others crop up in that space and become a thing all of a sudden. Might be worth a discussion.
The church does not accept LGBT folks in church due to the sentiment "from the beginning it was not so"
The church does accept divorced people and even allows them to remarry, even though Jesus said remarrying equals adultery "because from the beginning it was not so"
Should the church be concerned about the acceptance of this, and similar hypocrisies? How does God tend to respond to hypocrisy when quoted directly in the bible?
Once you have one blind spot, many others crop up in that space, and become a thing all of a sudden. Might be worth a discussion.
That's what I thought. Christians being hypocritical is worth a discussion, but to preface that discussion with those particular comments, as they were worded, was a mistake.For this reason, I believe the initial hypothesis presented is seriously flawed.
Totally the wrong choice of issues to introduce a discussion on hypocrisy.
Frankly very offensive.
That's what I thought. Christians being hypocritical is worth a discussion, but to preface that discussion with those particular comments, as they were worded, was a mistake.
I think it’s great they want Jesus. But it wolves in sheep’s clothing.
which is why you don't hear many sermons on James 1:27 I couldn't help but chuckle at the 2008 meltdown happening right at the peak of the prosperity gospel
Jesus ate and drank with tax collectors and sinners (Mark 2:14-17). People criticized him for that. He taught in parables to the crowds that went to listen to him. Jesus gave more detailed instructions to his disciples in private. Even then one of the twelve disciples sided with the chief priests and the teachers of the law. Judas led the police serving the chief priests of the Sanhedrin to where Jesus and the disciples were hidden at Gethsemane.You dodged my question so I'll put my cards on the table. Repentance is a life-long process. If homosexuality bars one from fellowship why not overeating, pride, dishonesty, whatever?
I don't know what denomination you belong to, but ours cannot deny baptism. And, the reason we don't have a litmus test is because we all know that we all would fail if it were different. How robust is grace, anyhow? Maybe works righteousness is where it's at. Clare, you almost have me convinced that we don't need grace. Or maybe only righteous people need grace; sinners are out of luck?
The opposite of the passages I provided?I am not sure how you can derive at the conclusion that hypocrisy is just how it is for Christians. Paul clearly teaches that the Holy Spirit convicts us of sin and stops us FROM being hypocrites. Quite the opposite I'm afraid.
Blessings
The church does not accept LGBT folks in church due to the sentiment "from the beginning it was not so"
Jesus ate and drank with tax collectors and sinners (Mark 2:14-17). People criticized him for that. He taught in parables to the crowds that went to listen to him. Jesus gave more detailed instructions to his disciples in private. Even then one of the twelve disciples sided with the chief priests and the teachers of the law. Judas led the police serving the chief priests of the Sanhedrin to where Jesus and the disciples were hidden at Gethsemane.
A pastor may preach against homosexuality, inappropriate content, fornication and adultery. A Bible reader may learn these things by reading Bible verses. For a single person to be celibate is not a sin, even though marriage is popular. It seems married people are more likely to prosper. This is not always true as one spouse might squander resources or become disabled. Financial insecurity caused some divorces. I met a lady in online dating who had lived in a big house with her husband. She was divorced after becoming disabled. Her ex-husband remarried a healthy woman. She who had enjoyed wealth suffered poverty as a disabled divorced woman. In the Old Testament, the Lord asked Jeremiah not to marry. Paul accepted a celibate calling. Those who are married might become widows or widowers. They are not as likely to remarry in old age, yet some have faith to remarry in old age. Some who divorced went from marriage to marriage abandoning spouses and children along the way. This is a sin.
Who ever suggested chastising? Do you pay people to do that to you, or is it just randomly applied by strangers? Did people pay Jesus to Chastise them?Have you never backslid and fallen into sin and been chastised? Then repented, turned, and never gone back to that sin?