YeshuaFan
Well-Known Member
- Oct 19, 2018
- 3,003
- 996
- 63
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
the 1611 translators saw the geneva as valid, amd must have seen Catholic Rheims also, as they used it a lot!As for a historical basis for King James Bible Only: What other Bible did Protestant Bible believing Christians use for hundreds of year besides the KJB before the Critical Text came out? As for a biblical basis for the King James Bible Alone: Well, when we read the Bible, do we see a defense for:
(1) One Word of God being communicated that we could trust?
(2) Multiple Words of God with us having to look to old variant manuscripts with believing there was never any perfect Word of God? We see two dividing factions with Christians on this issue. Those who believe there is only Word of God that is perfect and those who don’t believe that. Which one is more biblical? I would say the KJB Only position is more biblical position to have. For we do not see any person in the Bible taking the Modern Scholarship Approach to God’s Word.
Upvote
0