I don’t get your reasoning at all, even if you don’t believe the bible. When PhDs and scientists look at any situation in mainstream science, and say, wait a minute this doesn’t look right or there could be another answer, they are immediately rejected and labeled liars, quacks, etc. It’s like you’ve been tranced… reject the bible, its not science, don’t even consider it, assault it, you know it doesn’t make sense, it couldn’t happen, don’t listen. When someone even mentions the possibility of the Grand Canyon being caused by a flood, you ignore the power that could have been released on a global scale, yet accepting it regarding plate tectonics, and talk about any suggestion of flooding as if it could have only been on a local scale and in terms of rainwater run-off, and therefore not a possibility. How much clearer could Genesis 7:11 (In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.) be? As I said, even if you don't believe it, it was written in an untripping, short term, earth-altering way which brings PhD's at odds even today.