My Big Bang Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,061
51,500
Guam
✟4,907,564.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
57
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟31,584.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Then I'll go ahead and call it what he called it: Primordial Atom.
As long as you remember that it was not an actual atom.
It had no nucleus. No electrons or protons. None of the things that make an atom.
Chinese infantrymen from the western highlands call artillery tractors "oxen".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

inquiring mind

and a discerning heart
Site Supporter
Dec 31, 2016
7,222
3,311
U.S.
✟675,164.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
As long as you remember that it was not an actual atom.
It had no nucleus. No electrons or protons. None of the things that make an atom.
Chinese infantrymen from the western highlands call artillery tractors "oxen".
And, a wet crow never flies at night.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,061
51,500
Guam
✟4,907,564.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,061
51,500
Guam
✟4,907,564.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
you have made up your mind on this. And no fact will ever be allowed to challenge your decision.

You'll do the same with the facts I posted in Post 188 too, won't you?
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,421
53
✟250,677.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
He and I have been over this before.

More than once, I think.



SOURCE

I love posting from links that have "edu" in them; then watching them deny their own science.
Unfermented grape juice is a recent invention.

But either way, thw bible says wine, not grape juice. Its just your biased idea that inserts something that isnt there.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
14,890
11,886
54
USA
✟298,883.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I don’t get your reasoning at all, even if you don’t believe the bible. When PhDs and scientists look at any situation in mainstream science, and say, wait a minute this doesn’t look right or there could be another answer, they are immediately rejected and labeled liars, quacks, etc. It’s like you’ve been tranced… reject the bible, its not science, don’t even consider it, assault it, you know it doesn’t make sense, it couldn’t happen, don’t listen. When someone even mentions the possibility of the Grand Canyon being caused by a flood, you ignore the power that could have been released on a global scale, yet accepting it regarding plate tectonics, and talk about any suggestion of flooding as if it could have only been on a local scale and in terms of rainwater run-off, and therefore not a possibility. How much clearer could Genesis 7:11 (In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.) be? As I said, even if you don't believe it, it was written in an untripping, short term, earth-altering way which brings PhD's at odds even today.

I'm not sure who these "PhDs and scientists you speak of are, but there are some other general problems with your statement.

1. Not all PhDs are scientists. PhDs are issued in a wide variety of fields from history to engineering to literature to sociology that aren't science. I think you were looking for the term "PhD scientists".

2. Not all PhD scientists are doing anything about or have expertise in fields related to this geology (or any other possible C/E topic). They study semiconductors and mangrove swamps, pulsating stars and ancient human fossils, develop vaccines and drugs, but they aren't geologists.

3. What you want are geologists of various kinds: seismologists, geophysicists, petrologists, volcanologists, geologists studying sedimentation, plate tectonics, erosion, etc. They are the ones that figured all of this stuff out and they overwhelmingly support the notion that the Grand Canyon was carved over millions of years and the Earth is old. Sorry, that's just the way the science works out.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.