- Dec 5, 2021
- 194
- 88
- 38
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Divorced
If the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
If the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
C'mon man. You know the Sadducees cannot answer that! lolIf the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
The case can be made that he did. I have my own views on it that are de facto Orthodox but are not Orthodox as a whole. It's something I defer judgement on. Looking at the Olivet Discourse:
Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
Then to the account of the destruction of Jerusalem:
Besides these, a few days after that feast, on the one and twentieth day of the month Artemisius, [Jyar,] a certain prodigious and incredible phenomenon appeared: I suppose the account of it would seem to be a fable, were it not related by those that saw it, and were not the events that followed it of so considerable a nature as to deserve such signals; for, before sun-setting, chariots and troops of soldiers in their armor were seen running about among the clouds, and surrounding of cities.
Now back to the Olivet Discourse:
Mat 24:31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Notice that he says "he shall send his angels...and they shall gather". Not that they would return right away, only that they would be sent out.
Only on Revelation 21.If the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
Matthew 24 speaks prophetically both of the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem and the events to take place leading up to the second coming. Some of the prophecies that were fulfilled then have been repeated since. Some will be repeated again near the end.
The time of the end has been ongoing since the crucifixion, and prophecies of Matthew 24 are still pending (Matthew 5:18, Revelation 22:10, Matthew 24:29-31), and thus, relevant until we see Jesus coming in the clouds.
- There will be Christian persecution. Those who do not take the mark will not be able to buy or sell (Revelation 13:17), and a death decree (Revelation 13:15) will cause them to have to flee from persecution (Matthew 24:15-22).
- The abomination of desolation will be repeated (Matthew 24:15). Where before it was physical, the second time will be spiritual. The temple being the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 3:16-20), and the prophesied apostasy (2 Thessalonians 2:3).
None, Directly.If the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
None, Directly.
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that Jesus parousia would occur within the lifetime of His apostles.
(Matthew 24:34, Mark 13:30, Luke 21:32,Matthew 16:28, Luke 9:27,Matthew 10:23)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that all things written would be fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD.
(Luke 21:20-22)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that as it was in Noah's day, So would the coming of the Son of Man be. The wicked would be taken in Judgement, and the rightesous would be "left behind" on earth.
(Matthew 24:37-41)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that salvation was not complete until Christ returned.
(Hebrews 9:28)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that The way to heaven was not opened until the Temple was destroyed.
(Hebrews 9:8)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that on the "new earth" Birth, death, ageing and sinners would continue to exist.(Isaiah 65:17-21, Revelation 21 & 22)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that Christ is an invisible King, He was to come "in His kingdom" and that the coming of His kingdom would be "unobservable"
(1 Timothy 1:17, Luke 17:20)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that Christ, Lord of the Vineyard, personally came back and took the kingdom from the Jews, destroying them at that time, and gave it to the church, who is the holy nation that bears it's fruits.
(Matthew 21:33-43, 1 Peter 2:9)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that the Church is the "Israel of God" and the only heir to the promise of Abraham. (Galatians 6:16)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that the true inheritance of Abraham is not earthly, but the better country of Heaven. (Hebrews 11:16, 1 Peter 1:4)
That said, The Old Testament Temple--which was itself designed to be a microcosm of the created universe--may demonstrate, by its destruction, that the created cosmos will be brought to a new consummation in our future. I have found no scriptural reason to rule it out, nor to deny that such an event would be the result of a future to us "parousia" of Christ.. Yet even that would not be an end of God's creation, but, rather, a new outworking of it. For sure, whatever changes God may have in store for the cosmos, the time and details have not been disclosed to men (Deuteronomy 29:29).
Acts 1:9-11If the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
If the olivet discourse refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, what verses in the Bible refer to the actual, literal, physical, second coming of Jesus?
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that Christ is an invisible King, He was to come "in His kingdom" and that the coming of His kingdom would be "unobservable"
(1 Timothy 1:17, Luke 17:20)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that Christ, Lord of the Vineyard, personally came back and took the kingdom from the Jews, destroying them at that time, and gave it to the church, who is the holy nation that bears it's fruits.
(Matthew 21:33-43, 1 Peter 2:9)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that the Church is the "Israel of God" and the only heir to the promise of Abraham. (Galatians 6:16)
The Bible, and therefore preterism, teaches that the true inheritance of Abraham is not earthly, but the better country of Heaven. (Hebrews 11:16, 1 Peter 1:4)
No.Thank you for taking the time to make such a detailed response with all the scripture references. Are you a full preterist?
Of course it is.That’s not what the Bible teaches,
The New Testament and Old Testament unequivocally teach an unending kingdom on the earth, with Jesus sitting and reigning on the throne of King David
In Acts 1 Jesus literally ascends bodily and visibly from Mount Olive, and the angel said this same Jesus will return in like manner as you have seen Him leave - meaning His literal return bodily and visibly back to Mount Olive
He will return and land on mount Olive with all His saints per Zechariah 14:5,
Isaiah 65:20-25 describes the millennial reign of Jesus on the earth and in Jerusalem and how radically different it will be, with peace on earth, long life, no weeping or crying, and with no wars, no death - even carnivores become herbivores and don’t eat other animals.
Agree. Acts 2:29-36 is very clear that Jesus was raised up to David's throne by way of His resurrection. It's very straightforward. Only doctrinal bias can prevent one from seeing what Peter taught there.Christ sits on the Throne of David today.
Acts 2:30-36
" Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him (David), that of the fruit of his (Davids) loins, according to the flesh, he would "raise up" Christ to sit on his(David's) throne; 31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. 32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
The Above scripture says God promised David He would "raise up" Christ to sit on Davids throne, and the above scripture further points out that promise spoke of Christs resurrection where God did in fact "raise up" Christ just as promised.
It's amazing how I can completely agree with you on one thing and completely disagree with you on another. No, it's not talking about Him coming in like manner as He disappeared after going into heaven. That makes no sense.Rather, the scripture says he would come in like manner as He went "into heaven".
How did Jesus enter heaven?
Hidden from their eyes by a cloud (Acst 1:9)
Wait, I thought you said that you think Acts 1:11 indicates that He would not be seen when He comes? How can those scriptures you referenced here fulfill Acts 1:11 in that case? Please make up your mind. Was He going to come visibly or not? It seems like you're trying to have it both ways.Besudes We have apostolic confirmation of the fulfillment of Acts 1:11 on at least two occasions. It happened to Paul on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1-9) and to Stephen at His stoning.(Acts 7:54-56)