Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And once again your strategy is when you are in a hole to keep digging.Now you're just doubling-down on your erroneous tactic, further destroying any credibility of your "points".
Upvote
0
And once again your strategy is when you are in a hole to keep digging.Now you're just doubling-down on your erroneous tactic, further destroying any credibility of your "points".
And once again your strategy is when you are in a hole to keep digging.
Whatever you say, Chad. Just as long as it's somewhere where I don't have to read it.
Backwards as usual. It is rather sad since if you used proper debating techniques you might make a positive contribution now and then instead of writing posts that are extremely easy to refute. But you have that shovel. Keep digging.Now you're using psychological projection. Got anything else? Gaslighting technique, perhaps?
Backwards as usual. It is rather sad since if you used proper debating techniques you might make a positive contribution now and then instead of writing posts that are extremely easy to refute. But you have that shovel. Keep digging.
That's what a person says when they're being honest about not wanting to see facts that make them uncomfortable: "Just as long as it's somewhere where I don't have to read it."
Your definition of facts appears to be the same as Chad's. You'll have plenty to talk about if he heads over to the conspiracy section.
Quite interesting that you say that if you were vaccinated then you'd consider it the right think to do to not put others at risk. But you want to complain when it's required that you restrict yourself from harming others when you're not vaccinated.
Have you actually thought this through?
All I'm saying is that you vaxxed are no different to us unvaxxed because the vaccine doesn't do anything...
I know that. It's just a conspiracy to frustrate the conservative right. Saline solutions is all. Did you know that Pfizer is an old Nordic term meaning 'Fooled you'?
You were refuted. And false claims of gaslighting are technically against the rules. Your error was clearly explained to you. I want you to learn how to be a better debater. There is no pleasure in winning a physical fight with an invalid in a wheelchair. If such a person was threatening others with a knife you would simply disarm him.Yet you're not refuting. You're trolling. Is that your latest debating technique, right after gaslighting and psychological projection?
Facts are facts. This is conspiracy fact, not conspiracy theory.
All the facts about COVID are being suppressed.
A post like this which is saying things which are obviously false doesn't do much good. And might actually do some harm by misleading others.All I'm saying is that you vaxxed are no different to us unvaxxed because the vaccine doesn't do anything
Right -- we get that you're saying that. All we're saying is that what you're saying is utterly wrong and is contradicted by a mass of evidence.All I'm saying is that you vaxxed are no different to us unvaxxed because the vaccine doesn't do anything,
And then you compound your error of fact by offering a non sequitur as support.if it did I wouldn't be hearing about regular breakouts and the spreading of the new variant
Not in a discussion that tries to equate the massacre of millions with folks needing to show a card to see a movie.I guess you're not interested in having a discussion.
Right -- we get that you're saying that. All we're saying is that what you're saying is utterly wrong and is contradicted by a mass of evidence.
And then you compound your error of fact by offering a non sequitur as support.
A post like this which is saying things which are obviously false doesn't do much good. And might actually do some harm by misleading others.
It does -- which is why every expert who's looked at the evidence has concluded the same thing. Which is not what you've concluded.The evidence speaks for itself.
No, I ignore your evidence because my job is to evaluate evidence about viral outbreaks and I've evaluated yours.You lot just like to ignore it because you want to galavant around while placing all blame on the unvaxxed, despite the fact you can still spread the virus.
You were refuted. And false claims of gaslighting are technically against the rules. Your error was clearly explained to you. I want you to learn how to be a better debater. There is no pleasure in winning a physical fight with an invalid in a wheelchair. If such a person was threatening others with a knife you would simply disarm him.
When you use such incredibly bad logical fallacies, such as the Tu Quoque fallacy you are doing the debate equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot. All it takes to refute you is to point out the logical fallacy that you just abused.