Crutches evolve, that doesn't mean they do so independent of the need to fit the individual?

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,380
704
45
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
When you write things like this it might make sense to you but it makes no sense to the reader. Are you aware of that?

I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
 
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
57
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟31,584.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
Are you a population of many individuals?
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,258
8,056
✟326,329.00
Faith
Atheist
I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
I am one of many.

Christians.

We are of one mind, together: a population.

How my brother evolves, I evolve?
This forum is supposed to be discussing creation and evolution by natural selection. Your posts do not appear to discuss either.
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,437
2,685
United States
✟204,079.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
The ability to invent, build, and utilize crutches is the result of evolution. Our unique dexterity, intellect, and social connectedness in the animal kingdom has allowed us to develop technology that “adapts” us to problems in our environment and our own bodies that would otherwise prevent us from reproducing.
 
Upvote 0

Frank Robert

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2021
2,276
1,121
KW
✟127,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No, I am refusing to believe it, if it cannot be taken further (independently of everyone believing the exact same thing - Christians do not do this).
You are confusing belief with scientific evidence.

You can tell me your are inspired, that you have found application and that your focus is beginning to have an effect - I am not limiting what you can do with your theory: you are limiting me?
It sounds like that your theory is something along the lines of "if you don't know everything, you know nothing.

Just because you have a bat and a ball, does not mean everyone plays with them in the same order - you understand how patently ridiculous that is right? That we all start with the theory of Evolution in mind, if we are to succeed?
Let's go with your metaphor of a bat and ball. It sounds like you want to play the game but don't want to do so with evidence.

Again, Creation and Evolution are not mutually eliminating - can you please learn this?
I think the question of "mutually eliminating" is a philosophical one. There are many religious evolutionary scientists from all religions but there are also areas where evolution and creation conflict. I think the Catholic church has an optimal approach by not taking an official position on the theory of creation or evolution, leaving the specifics of either theistic evolution or literal creationism to the individual.
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,214
3,834
45
✟924,291.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
That doesn't make sense, how can falsehoods and lies be the same thing?

That's what a lie is: knowingly stating a falsehood.

Agents make choices, when Darwin discovered "Evolution" he was choosing to doubt one adaptation would be enough?

No, that isn't evolution works and that isn't how discovering evolution works.

Also, you are forgetting:
evolution isn't a choice
adaption isn't a choice
individuals don't evolve
individuals don't have an evolution

There did not have to be a population of Darwins, before the theory of Evolution came about?

Humans learning about evolution isn't evolution.

The theory of evolution is the scientific explanation of the physical process of evolution.

Studying and defining the process is not the same as the process happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
57
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟31,584.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I am one of many.

Christians.

We are of one mind, together: a population.

How my brother evolves, I evolve?
Well... you obviously dont understand christianity either.
So what DO you understand?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,437
2,685
United States
✟204,079.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Come on guys: this is really easy...

...if crutches evolve, why do they need to be tailored to the height of the person using them?

The whole point is that evolving one way, does not eliminate creating another?
Crutches do not evolve.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,380
704
45
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
You are confusing belief with scientific evidence.
I am using conjecture, to tease out the possibility that "Evolution" might be interpreted differently - depending on how it is believed ("everything's relative" so people say, does that not apply to "Evolution"?).
It sounds like that your theory is something along the lines of "if you don't know everything, you know nothing.
That is what I have been at pains to say is not how Evolution and Creation work: one does not eliminate the other. Even if I peg you on something you don't know, by the same token it can be said "Creation should be ready to help".
Let's go with your metaphor of a bat and ball. It sounds like you want to play the game but don't want to do so with evidence.

You are saying changing the batting order, will change how the game is played? Structurally?

I think the question of "mutually eliminating" is a philosophical one. There are many religious evolutionary scientists from all religions but there are also areas where evolution and creation conflict. I think the Catholic church has an optimal approach by not taking an official position on the theory of creation or evolution, leaving the specifics of either theistic evolution or literal creationism to the individual.

Mutual elimination is a stylistic question: it addresses whether species will adopt Evolution or Creation under different circumstances (in the sense that both sides of the difference have advantages that allow them to continue)
 
Upvote 0

Mr Laurier

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2021
1,141
366
57
Georgian Bay/Bruce Peninsula
✟31,584.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Come on guys: this is really easy...

...if crutches evolve, why do they need to be tailored to the height of the person using them?

The whole point is that evolving one way, does not eliminate creating another?
Crutches do not evolve.
Crutches do not breed or reproduce themselves.
Crutches are manufactured artifacts. Not living beings.
 
Upvote 0

Frank Robert

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2021
2,276
1,121
KW
✟127,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I am using conjecture, to tease out the possibility that "Evolution" might be interpreted differently - depending on how it is believed ("everything's relative" so people say, does that not apply to "Evolution"?).
You insist on confusing belief with scientific evidence.

That is what I have been at pains to say is not how Evolution and Creation work: one does not eliminate the other. Even if I peg you on something you don't know, by the same token it can be said "Creation should be ready to help".
Yes evolution and creation are not mutually exclusive but evolution does exclude creationism.

You are saying changing the batting order, will change how the game is played? Structurally?
It is you that wants to change the facts and evidence of evolution to correspond to your parcular beliefs.

Mutual elimination is a stylistic question: it addresses whether species will adopt Evolution or Creation under different circumstances (in the sense that both sides of the difference have advantages that allow them to continue)
The disadvantage for creation is that it is based on belief and not evidence. See my first response above.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,380
704
45
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
[...]

It is you that wants to change the facts and evidence of evolution to correspond to your parcular beliefs.
[...]

If I wanted to change the batting order, I would not expect the pitch to change.

The disadvantage for creation is that it is based on belief and not evidence. See my first response above.

That would mean there was no ultimate reason to believe it, but we both know that Creation is not claiming evidence for Evolution will disappear. The same evidence, is reason to help others in one respect and a reason to defend yourself, in another. You can't think about one thing in relation to Evolution, that would force you to stop defending it and yourself by it, right?
 
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,380
704
45
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Crutches do not evolve.
Crutches do not breed or reproduce themselves.
Crutches are manufactured artifacts. Not living beings.

Crutches don't become more efficient? Sticks, then cushioned, then adjustable - is not progress?
 
Upvote 0

Frank Robert

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2021
2,276
1,121
KW
✟127,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If I wanted to change the batting order, I would not expect the pitch to change.
Your comprehension of baseball is just as lacking as your comprehension of evolution. A pitcher will adjust his pitches to the batter.
That would mean there was no ultimate reason to believe it
People will believe what they will based on their own experiences.
Creation is not claiming evidence for Evolution will disappear.
But it wants to subject evolution to a non-scientific, mangled interpretation.
The same evidence, is reason to help others in one respect and a reason to defend yourself, in another.
I am not arguing against faith. Faith is not based on evidence, nor does evidence need defending especially when there is overwhelming evidence that supports evolution.
You can't think about one thing in relation to Evolution, that would force you to stop defending it and yourself by it, right?
You lack understanding of science in general and evidence in particular. I am persuaded by the evidence and at present there is no scientific evidence for the supernatural. If there were verifiable observations of organisms being created supernaturally it would go a long way to changing not only my mind but also many others.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,380
704
45
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Your comprehension of baseball is just as lacking as your comprehension of evolution. A pitcher will adjust his pitches to the batter.

Are you saying every time a batter changes, the pitcher will change where he pitches from? And over time the pitcher learns to pitch from exactly the right place?

People will believe what they will based on their own experiences.
But it wants to subject evolution to a non-scientific, mangled interpretation.

The faith, just wants you to acknowledge the faith. Without faith, getting it wrong can be disastrous.

I am not arguing against faith. Faith is not based on evidence, nor does evidence need defending especially when there is overwhelming evidence that supports evolution.
You lack understanding of science in general and evidence in particular. I am persuaded by the evidence and at present there is no scientific evidence for the supernatural. If there were verifiable observations of organisms being created supernaturally it would go a long way to changing not only my mind but also many others.

I am not trying to convince you to believe Creation to the exclusion of Evolution, you should not be trying to convince me of Evolution to the exclusion of Creation.
 
Upvote 0