When you write things like this it might make sense to you but it makes no sense to the reader. Are you aware of that?
Forgive them, Father, they know not what to think.
Upvote
0
When you write things like this it might make sense to you but it makes no sense to the reader. Are you aware of that?
When you write things like this it might make sense to you but it makes no sense to the reader. Are you aware of that?
Are you a population of many individuals?I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
Are you a population of many individuals?
I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
This forum is supposed to be discussing creation and evolution by natural selection. Your posts do not appear to discuss either.I am one of many.
Christians.
We are of one mind, together: a population.
How my brother evolves, I evolve?
The ability to invent, build, and utilize crutches is the result of evolution. Our unique dexterity, intellect, and social connectedness in the animal kingdom has allowed us to develop technology that “adapts” us to problems in our environment and our own bodies that would otherwise prevent us from reproducing.I'm supposed to believe that if I use a crutch, my Evolution is "over"? I can no longer adapt, the way the rest of the species is adapted?
You are confusing belief with scientific evidence.No, I am refusing to believe it, if it cannot be taken further (independently of everyone believing the exact same thing - Christians do not do this).
It sounds like that your theory is something along the lines of "if you don't know everything, you know nothing.You can tell me your are inspired, that you have found application and that your focus is beginning to have an effect - I am not limiting what you can do with your theory: you are limiting me?
Let's go with your metaphor of a bat and ball. It sounds like you want to play the game but don't want to do so with evidence.Just because you have a bat and a ball, does not mean everyone plays with them in the same order - you understand how patently ridiculous that is right? That we all start with the theory of Evolution in mind, if we are to succeed?
I think the question of "mutually eliminating" is a philosophical one. There are many religious evolutionary scientists from all religions but there are also areas where evolution and creation conflict. I think the Catholic church has an optimal approach by not taking an official position on the theory of creation or evolution, leaving the specifics of either theistic evolution or literal creationism to the individual.Again, Creation and Evolution are not mutually eliminating - can you please learn this?
That doesn't make sense, how can falsehoods and lies be the same thing?
Agents make choices, when Darwin discovered "Evolution" he was choosing to doubt one adaptation would be enough?
There did not have to be a population of Darwins, before the theory of Evolution came about?
Well... you obviously dont understand christianity either.I am one of many.
Christians.
We are of one mind, together: a population.
How my brother evolves, I evolve?
Crutches do not evolve.Come on guys: this is really easy...
...if crutches evolve, why do they need to be tailored to the height of the person using them?
The whole point is that evolving one way, does not eliminate creating another?
I am using conjecture, to tease out the possibility that "Evolution" might be interpreted differently - depending on how it is believed ("everything's relative" so people say, does that not apply to "Evolution"?).You are confusing belief with scientific evidence.
That is what I have been at pains to say is not how Evolution and Creation work: one does not eliminate the other. Even if I peg you on something you don't know, by the same token it can be said "Creation should be ready to help".It sounds like that your theory is something along the lines of "if you don't know everything, you know nothing.
Let's go with your metaphor of a bat and ball. It sounds like you want to play the game but don't want to do so with evidence.
I think the question of "mutually eliminating" is a philosophical one. There are many religious evolutionary scientists from all religions but there are also areas where evolution and creation conflict. I think the Catholic church has an optimal approach by not taking an official position on the theory of creation or evolution, leaving the specifics of either theistic evolution or literal creationism to the individual.
Crutches do not evolve.Come on guys: this is really easy...
...if crutches evolve, why do they need to be tailored to the height of the person using them?
The whole point is that evolving one way, does not eliminate creating another?
You insist on confusing belief with scientific evidence.I am using conjecture, to tease out the possibility that "Evolution" might be interpreted differently - depending on how it is believed ("everything's relative" so people say, does that not apply to "Evolution"?).
Yes evolution and creation are not mutually exclusive but evolution does exclude creationism.That is what I have been at pains to say is not how Evolution and Creation work: one does not eliminate the other. Even if I peg you on something you don't know, by the same token it can be said "Creation should be ready to help".
It is you that wants to change the facts and evidence of evolution to correspond to your parcular beliefs.You are saying changing the batting order, will change how the game is played? Structurally?
The disadvantage for creation is that it is based on belief and not evidence. See my first response above.Mutual elimination is a stylistic question: it addresses whether species will adopt Evolution or Creation under different circumstances (in the sense that both sides of the difference have advantages that allow them to continue)
[...]
It is you that wants to change the facts and evidence of evolution to correspond to your parcular beliefs.
[...]
The disadvantage for creation is that it is based on belief and not evidence. See my first response above.
Crutches do not evolve.
Crutches do not breed or reproduce themselves.
Crutches are manufactured artifacts. Not living beings.
Your comprehension of baseball is just as lacking as your comprehension of evolution. A pitcher will adjust his pitches to the batter.If I wanted to change the batting order, I would not expect the pitch to change.
People will believe what they will based on their own experiences.That would mean there was no ultimate reason to believe it
But it wants to subject evolution to a non-scientific, mangled interpretation.Creation is not claiming evidence for Evolution will disappear.
I am not arguing against faith. Faith is not based on evidence, nor does evidence need defending especially when there is overwhelming evidence that supports evolution.The same evidence, is reason to help others in one respect and a reason to defend yourself, in another.
You lack understanding of science in general and evidence in particular. I am persuaded by the evidence and at present there is no scientific evidence for the supernatural. If there were verifiable observations of organisms being created supernaturally it would go a long way to changing not only my mind but also many others.You can't think about one thing in relation to Evolution, that would force you to stop defending it and yourself by it, right?
Your comprehension of baseball is just as lacking as your comprehension of evolution. A pitcher will adjust his pitches to the batter.
People will believe what they will based on their own experiences.
But it wants to subject evolution to a non-scientific, mangled interpretation.
I am not arguing against faith. Faith is not based on evidence, nor does evidence need defending especially when there is overwhelming evidence that supports evolution.
You lack understanding of science in general and evidence in particular. I am persuaded by the evidence and at present there is no scientific evidence for the supernatural. If there were verifiable observations of organisms being created supernaturally it would go a long way to changing not only my mind but also many others.