Your entire post loses all its credibility from the first sentence. You lambaste AOC because of her hypocrisy but not her views? How do you do that? How can she be a hypocrite if not for her views? They go hand in hand.
well, simple...hypocrisy is going against something you claim to stand for, a person's views are just that, their views.
For instance:
I can have an honest conversation with a person who claims to be a vegan, and lives the vegan lifestyle. I can't have that same honest conversation with a person who claims to be a vegan, and hosts a rib cookoff in the name of promoting vegan causes.
That's the difference between AOC and Bernie.
I disagree with Bernie on many a thing, but I never get the impression that he's phony or lying to me. I would gladly sit down with Bernie for an intellectual and spirited debate of the issues. AOC on the other hand...blasts 'the rich' while attending a $30k per ticket Met gala in a custom made "tax the rich" dress.
And you demonstrate yet again that you don't understand her views. She isn't a hypocrite for being capitalistic when her views are not anti-capitalistic. But you think she's anti-capitalism because you are so far right you just believe the same as the rest of the reactionaries.
Again, her espoused views are anti-capitalistic. You can't call capitalism "irredeemable" and "sacrificing humans and the environment in the name of profit" without considering it a "bad thing".
Gotta pick one...can't have it both ways here... if her own words don't define her position on it, then she is, as I said, a hypocrite.
If someone calls something "irredeemable", then there's no other logical conclusion than they're "anti" that thing.
None of this will register with you though, as you've demonstrated time and again, including in the very post I'm responding to, where you bleat out the same old hackneyed stereotypes based on nothing more than reactionary radical right-wing lore about "the LEFT (oooooohhhh!!!!)".
I did none of that, you simply couldn't come up with a productive rebuttal to what I said, so you resorted to blatant strawman arguments.