‘Incarceration’: CNN Guest Asks If Jail Time Could End The ‘Stupidity’ Of The ‘Cult Of Trump’

Status
Not open for further replies.

IWalkAlone

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2021
1,687
310
Ohio
✟11,916.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
“cult of Trump”?
A few characteristics associated With cults
  • The group displays an excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader, and regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.
  • Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.
  • The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel.
  • The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s), and its members.
  • The group has a polarized, us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.
  • The leader is not accountable to any authorities.
  • The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group.
  • The group is preoccupied with making money.
Qualities & Characteristics of a Cult | Cult Research

One Mic One Voice Podcast Interview: Trump's Political Cult | Cult Research & Information Center
You just described the democrat party.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: timothyu
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If
1) Trump avoids prison
2) Trump wins (or steals) the next election
3) Trump remains popular with his base
4) Trump doesn't go senile enough to put off his base and doesn't die within the next 7 years

Trump could run for a second term in 2028. The rule about 2 terms is consecutive terms.

No... the 22nd Amendment is not restricted to consecutive terms... it's 2 terms total.
 
Upvote 0

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN

My dad died 1/12/2023. I'm still devastated.
Jul 1, 2007
17,286
5,058
Native Land
✟331,933.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I would hope 74 millions of people, that voted for him. Have changed their views about Trump. Since his Jan 6 incident. But Michael Cohen was spot-on.
Donald Trump does not want to be president of this country. He wants to be a dictator, autocrat, or a monarch. He wants to be the Kim Jong-Un, the Vladimir Putin” of the United States of America.
Trump will not stop insisting that he won the 2020 presidential election against Joe Biden, because his goal “is to convince you that he won the election, and he’s done that with this percentage of Americans that are so deep into the cult of Trump — and trust me, I know about the cult of Trump. I was one of its leaders, maybe one of its founders. And I see exactly the stupidity of people as I walk in the city, or I get certain text messages on occasion from individuals who are so entrenched into this cult that they can’t see straight.”
Never truer word. Michael Cohen tells us, what the whole world has witness Trump doing.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,848
25,781
LA
✟555,562.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
If
1) Trump avoids prison
2) Trump wins (or steals) the next election
3) Trump remains popular with his base
4) Trump doesn't go senile enough to put off his base and doesn't die within the next 7 years

Trump could run for a second term in 2028. The rule about 2 terms is consecutive terms.
The amendment specifically says that no one can be elected to more than two terms which leaves room to serve more than two so long as you aren’t elected more than twice, like in the case of a VP finishing out their boss’s term and then being elected to two of their own. They don’t have to be consecutive terms though.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,848
25,781
LA
✟555,562.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
  • Haha
Reactions: cow451
Upvote 0

stevil

Godless and without morals
Feb 5, 2011
7,034
5,808
✟249,915.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The amendment specifically says that no one can be elected to more than two terms which leaves room to serve more than two so long as you aren’t elected more than twice, like in the case of a VP finishing out their boss’s term and then being elected to two of their own. They don’t have to be consecutive terms though.
OK, I was wrong. I think I got that from reading some articles a couple of years ago, but maybe I remember it wrongly.

This elected thing, does that mean elected by the people or elected by the electors?
I only ask because the Republican party have been working hard at pushing the boundaries and challenging the legal position of the "norms".
I don't think it is meaningful for Trump because he would be so very old by the time he could attempt a third term. But I guess for anyone that may try to attempt this pattern/behaviour that Trump has established.
If they legitimately lost an election (like Trump did in 2020) but if they had willing and complicit people in significant positions, such as electors or a willing VP or willing AG. Could they legally circumvent the election results and establish themselves as president for a third term and hence bypass the 22nd amendment?
 
Upvote 0

IWalkAlone

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2021
1,687
310
Ohio
✟11,916.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I would hope 74 millions of people, that voted for him. Have changed their views about Trump. Since his Jan 6 incident. But Michael Cohen was spot-on. Never truer word. Michael Cohen tells us, what the whole world has witness Trump doing.
Do you think Trump wanted the rioters to go inside the capital building? Democrats encouraged BLM ANTIFA to protest, so does that mean democrats are responsible for BLM attacking federal buildings, and burning and looting other buildings?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: timothyu
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

stevil

Godless and without morals
Feb 5, 2011
7,034
5,808
✟249,915.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Do you think Trump wanted the rioters to go inside the capital building? Democrats encouraged BLM ANTIFA to protest, so does that mean democrats are responsible for BLM attacking federal buildings, and burning and looting other buildings?
Personally, I think Trump rallied the group, encouraged them to go above and beyond (whatever that means).
I also think Trump and his team had a responsibility to beef up security around the Capital building knowing that he was sending such a large and incited crowd of people to that building. Trump's whole focus leading upto and beyond the election was to convince his supporters that the election was a fraud. He really had no intent to convince the courts, those 60 cases where a sham, a ruse to incite his supporters and get them to donate money.

With regards to Democrats encouraging Antifa, Is this a thing?
Do Democrats support Antifa???
 
Upvote 0

IWalkAlone

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2021
1,687
310
Ohio
✟11,916.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Personally, I think Trump rallied the group, encouraged them to go above and beyond (whatever that means).
I also think Trump and his team had a responsibility to beef up security around the Capital building knowing that he was sending such a large and incited crowd of people to that building. Trump's whole focus leading upto and beyond the election was to convince his supporters that the election was a fraud. He really had no intent to convince the courts, those 60 cases where a sham, a ruse to incite his supporters and get them to donate money.

With regards to Democrats encouraging Antifa, Is this a thing?
Do Democrats support Antifa???
Democrat leaders supported the protests. The protesters attacked federal buildings. And why didn't democrats beef up security? To the contrary they ordered the police not to disperse the crowd.
 
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,907
14,011
Broken Arrow, OK
✟701,649.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That is allowed but also negates you from being able to call something a conspiracy theory without investigation for the truth

I also do not need a degree in biology to properly identify dog doo


@hislegacy
Michael Cohen is not a Dem.

Did I identify him as one? Or did I say it fits in with the leftist ideal?
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,401
15,493
✟1,108,968.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Did I identify him as one? Or did I say it fits in with the leftist ideal?
You're implying that the person speaking is a leftist or it doesn't make any sense to say what you did.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,539
8,432
up there
✟307,106.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I also do not need a degree in biology to properly identify dog doo

Identify this:

This is the platform of the Build Back Better movement

These are the words and writings of one Klaus Schwab (Founder and executice chairman of the World Economic Forum).

“partnerships between businessmen, politicians, intellectuals and other leaders of society to ‘define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda’.”

The Fourth Industrial Revolution: “As human cloud platforms classify workers as self-employed, they are—for the moment—free of the requirement to pay minimum wages, employer taxes and social benefits

“Aging is an economic challenge because unless retirement ages are drastically increased so that older members of society can continue to contribute to the workforce (an economic imperative that has many economic benefits), the working-age population falls at the same time as the percentage of dependent elders increases”

“While it may not feel momentous to those of us experiencing a series of small but significant adjustments to life on a daily basis, it is not a minor change—the Fourth Industrial Revolution is a new chapter in human development, on a par with the first, second and third Industrial Revolutions, and once again driven by the increasing availability and interaction of a set of extraordinary technologies”.

Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies are truly disruptive—they upend existing ways of sensing, calculating, organizing, acting and delivering. They represent entirely new ways of creating value for organizations and citizens”. (7)

“a revolution that is fundamentally changing the way we live, work, and relate to one another”

“Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital,... Citizen concerns over privacy and establishing accountability in business and legal structures will require adjustments in thinking”

“an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain


Where it gets interesting...

* “The tools of the fourth industrial revolution enable new forms of surveillance and other means of control that run counter to healthy, open societies

* “As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase. Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk

* “The mind-boggling innovations triggered by the fourth industrial revolution, from biotechnology to AI, are redefining what it means to be human,”

** “Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us. We will become better able to manipulate our own genes, and those of our children.”

* “the ability of new technologies to literally become part of us” “curious mixes of digital-and-analog life that will redefine our very natures”

* “These technologies will operate within our own biology and change how we interface with the world. They are capable of crossing the boundaries of body and mind, enhancing our physical abilities, and even having a lasting impact on life itself “.

* “active implantable microchips that break the skin barrier of our bodies”, “smart tattoos”, “biological computing” and “custom-designed organisms”

* “sensors, memory switches and circuits can be encoded in common human gut bacteria”, “Smart Dust, arrays of full computers with antennas, each much smaller than a grain of sand, can now organize themselves inside the body”, “implanted devices will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals

* “Synthetic biology” “the ability to customize organisms by writing DNA”.



* “That it is now far easier to manipulate with precision the human genome within viable embryos means that we are likely to see the advent of designer babies in the future who possess particular traits or who are resistant to a specific disease

* “We are at the threshold of a radical systemic change that requires human beings to adapt continuously. As a result, we may witness an increasing degree of polarization in the world, marked by those who embrace change versus those who resist it."

* “the world lacks a consistent, positive and common narrative that outlines the opportunities and challenges of the fourth industrial revolution, a narrative that is essential if we are to empower a diverse set of individuals and communities and avoid a popular backlash against the fundamental changes under way”

* “It is, therefore, critical that we invest attention and energy in multistakeholder cooperation across academic, social, political, national and industry boundaries.”.

* “ The young generation is firmly at the vanguard of social change. There is little doubt that it will be the catalyst for change and a source of critical momentum for the Great Reset”

Vaccines * “New approaches are currently being imagined through the combination of Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies, such as nanoparticles and other advanced materials”

* “blanket the planet with communications pathways that could help connect the more than 4 billion people still lacking online access”

* “will only come about through improved global governance” “Some form of effective global governance”

* “Individuals used to identify their lives most closely with a place, an ethnic group, a particular culture or even a language. The advent of online engagement and increased exposure to ideas from other cultures means that identities are now more fungible than previously… Thanks to the combination of historical migration patterns and low-cost connectivity, family structures are being redefined”

His new book, Covid-19: The Great Reset (2019)... * “a succinct predictive analysis provided to private investors, global CEOs and opinion- and decision-makers”

* “conjectures and ideas about what the post-pandemic world might, and perhaps should, look like” “The Great Reset

* “World War II was the quintessential transformational war, triggering not only fundamental changes to the global order and the global economy, but also entailing radical shifts in social attitudes and beliefs that eventually paved the way for radically new policies and social contract provisions (like women joining the workforce before becoming voters). There are obviously fundamental dissimilarities between a pandemic and a war (that we will consider in some detail in the following pages), but the magnitude of their transformative power is comparable. Both have the potential to be a transformative crisis of previously unimaginable proportions”

* “This is what happened after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. All around the world, new security measures like employing widespread cameras, requiring electronic ID cards and logging employees or visitors in and out became the norm. At that time, these measures were deemed extreme, but today they are used everywhere and considered ‘normal'”

* “Some leaders and decision-makers who were already at the forefront of the fight against climate change may want to take advantage of the shock inflicted by the pandemic to implement long-lasting and wider environmental changes. They will, in effect, make ‘good use’ of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste"

* “It is our defining moment” “Many things will change forever”. “A new world will emerge”. “The societal upheaval unleashed by COVID-19 will last for years, and possibly generations”. “Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never”

* "Radical changes of such consequence are coming that some pundits have referred to a ‘before coronavirus’ (BC) and ‘after coronavirus’ (AC) era. ... In so doing, they will shape a ‘new normal’ radically different from the one we will be progressively leaving behind. Many of our beliefs and assumptions about what the world could or should look like will be shattered in the process"

* “new ways of using technology to change behavior” “The scale and breadth of the unfolding technological revolution will usher in economic, social and cultural changes of such phenomenal proportions that they are almost impossible to envisage”.

* “At first glance, the pandemic and the environment might seem to be only distantly related cousins; but they are much closer and more intertwined than we think” “they are global in nature and therefore can only be properly addressed in a globally coordinated fashion”.

* “A policy paper prepared by Systemiq in collaboration with the World Economic Forum estimates that building the nature-positive economy could represent more than $10 trillion per year by 2030… Resetting the environment should not be seen as a cost, but rather as an investment that will generate economic activity and employment opportunities”.

* “This crucial difference between the respective time-horizons of a pandemic and that of climate change and nature loss means that a pandemic risk requires immediate action that will be followed by a rapid result, while climate change and nature loss also require immediate action, but the result (or ‘future reward’, in the jargon of economists) will only follow with a certain time lag”.

* “The pandemic will mark a turning point by accelerating this transition. It has crystallized the issue and made a return to the pre-pandemic status quo impossible”. (110)

* “With the pandemic, the ‘digital transformation’ that so many analysts have been referring to for years, without being exactly sure what it meant, has found its catalyst. One major effect of confinement will be the expansion and progression of the digital world in a decisive and often permanent manner.

* “Consumers need products and, if they can’t shop, they will inevitably resort to purchasing them online. As the habit kicks in, people who had never shopped online before will become comfortable with doing so, while people who were part-time online shoppers before will presumably rely on it more.This accelerating growth of e-commerce means that the giants of the online retail industry are likely to emerge from the crisis even stronger than they were in the pre-pandemic era”. " It is not by accident that firms like Alibaba, Amazon, Netflix or Zoom emerged as ‘winners’ from the lockdowns”.

* “The pandemic may prove to be a boon for online education,” “In Asia, the shift to online education has been particularly notable, with a sharp increase in students’ digital enrolments, much higher valuation for online education businesses and more capital available for ‘ed-tech’ start-ups… In the summer of 2020, the direction of the trend seems clear: the world of education, like for so many other industries, will become partly virtual”. “The combined market value of the leading tech companies hit record after record during the lockdowns, even rising back above levels before the outbreak started… this phenomenon is unlikely to abate any time soon, quite the opposite”.

* “The necessity to address the pandemic with any means available (plus, during the outbreak, the need to protect health workers by allowing them to work remotely) removed some of the regulatory and legislative impediments related to the adoption of telemedicine”

* “To date governments have often slowed the pace of adoption of new technologies by lengthy ponderings about what the best regulatory framework should look like but, as the example of telemedicine and drone delivery is now showing, a dramatic acceleration forced by necessity is possible. During the lockdowns, a quasi-global relaxation of regulations that had previously hampered progress in domains where the technology had been available for years suddenly happened because there was no better or other choice available. What was until recently unthinkable suddenly became possible… New regulations will stay in place”.

* “In April 2020, just as the pandemic began to engulf the world, governments across the globe had announced stimulus programmes amounting to several trillion dollars, as if eight or nine Marshall Plans had been put into place almost simultaneously”. “COVID-19 has rewritten many of the rules of the game between the public and private sectors. … The benevolent (or otherwise) greater intrusion of governments in the life of companies and the conduct of their business will be country- and industry-dependent, therefore taking many different guises” “Measures that would have seemed inconceivable prior to the pandemic may well become standard around the world as governments try to prevent the economic recession from turning into a catastrophic depression.

* “Increasingly, there will be calls for government to act as a ‘payer of last resort’ to prevent or stem the spate of mass layoffs and business destruction triggered by the pandemic. All these changes are altering the rules of the economic and monetary policy ‘game’.” “One of the great lessons of the past five centuries in Europe and America is this: acute crises contribute to boosting the power of the state. It’s always been the case and there is no reason why it should be different with the COVID-19 pandemic”. “Looking to the future, governments will most likely, but with different degrees of intensity, decide that it’s in the best interest of society to rewrite some of the rules of the game and permanently increase their role”.

* : “The corporate move will be towards greater surveillance; for better or for worse, companies will be watching and sometimes recording what their workforce does. The trend could take many different forms, from measuring body temperatures with thermal cameras to monitoring via an app how employees comply with social distancing”

* “The next hurdle is the political challenge of vaccinating enough people worldwide (we are collectively as strong as the weakest link) with a high enough compliance rate despite the rise of anti-vaxxers”.

This will be the post covid era which Biden and others I mentioned are striving for. As i said, it is public knowledge. You can ignore it but it will still consume you.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

stevil

Godless and without morals
Feb 5, 2011
7,034
5,808
✟249,915.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Democrat leaders supported the protests. The protesters attacked federal buildings. And why didn't democrats beef up security? To the contrary they ordered the police not to disperse the crowd.
I understand that some Democrat leaders supported the BLM protests.
But where is it that any Democrats have been supporting ANTIFA?
 
Upvote 0

perplexed

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2005
2,079
470
50
✟100,945.00
Faith
Seeker
The amendment specifically says that no one can be elected to more than two terms which leaves room to serve more than two so long as you aren’t elected more than twice, like in the case of a VP finishing out their boss’s term and then being elected to two of their own. They don’t have to be consecutive terms though.

but as soon as you serve 2 years as president for any reason you can only run for election once

You cannot make Trump Vice president either because they have the same requirement, so to make the US the kingdom of Trump where he serves more than 2 terms make him speaker and make the President and Vice president
"resign"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,907
14,011
Broken Arrow, OK
✟701,649.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Identify this:

This is the platform of the Build Back Better movement

These are the words and writings of one Klaus Schwab (Founder and executice chairman of the World Economic Forum).

“partnerships between businessmen, politicians, intellectuals and other leaders of society to ‘define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda’.”

The Fourth Industrial Revolution: “As human cloud platforms classify workers as self-employed, they are—for the moment—free of the requirement to pay minimum wages, employer taxes and social benefits

“Aging is an economic challenge because unless retirement ages are drastically increased so that older members of society can continue to contribute to the workforce (an economic imperative that has many economic benefits), the working-age population falls at the same time as the percentage of dependent elders increases”

“While it may not feel momentous to those of us experiencing a series of small but significant adjustments to life on a daily basis, it is not a minor change—the Fourth Industrial Revolution is a new chapter in human development, on a par with the first, second and third Industrial Revolutions, and once again driven by the increasing availability and interaction of a set of extraordinary technologies”.

Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies are truly disruptive—they upend existing ways of sensing, calculating, organizing, acting and delivering. They represent entirely new ways of creating value for organizations and citizens”. (7)

“a revolution that is fundamentally changing the way we live, work, and relate to one another”

“Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital,... Citizen concerns over privacy and establishing accountability in business and legal structures will require adjustments in thinking”

“an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain


Where it gets interesting...

* “The tools of the fourth industrial revolution enable new forms of surveillance and other means of control that run counter to healthy, open societies

* “As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase. Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk

* “The mind-boggling innovations triggered by the fourth industrial revolution, from biotechnology to AI, are redefining what it means to be human,”

** “Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us. We will become better able to manipulate our own genes, and those of our children.”

* “the ability of new technologies to literally become part of us” “curious mixes of digital-and-analog life that will redefine our very natures”

* “These technologies will operate within our own biology and change how we interface with the world. They are capable of crossing the boundaries of body and mind, enhancing our physical abilities, and even having a lasting impact on life itself “.

* “active implantable microchips that break the skin barrier of our bodies”, “smart tattoos”, “biological computing” and “custom-designed organisms”

* “sensors, memory switches and circuits can be encoded in common human gut bacteria”, “Smart Dust, arrays of full computers with antennas, each much smaller than a grain of sand, can now organize themselves inside the body”, “implanted devices will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals

* “Synthetic biology” “the ability to customize organisms by writing DNA”.



* “That it is now far easier to manipulate with precision the human genome within viable embryos means that we are likely to see the advent of designer babies in the future who possess particular traits or who are resistant to a specific disease

* “We are at the threshold of a radical systemic change that requires human beings to adapt continuously. As a result, we may witness an increasing degree of polarization in the world, marked by those who embrace change versus those who resist it."

* “the world lacks a consistent, positive and common narrative that outlines the opportunities and challenges of the fourth industrial revolution, a narrative that is essential if we are to empower a diverse set of individuals and communities and avoid a popular backlash against the fundamental changes under way”

* “It is, therefore, critical that we invest attention and energy in multistakeholder cooperation across academic, social, political, national and industry boundaries.”.

* “ The young generation is firmly at the vanguard of social change. There is little doubt that it will be the catalyst for change and a source of critical momentum for the Great Reset”

Vaccines * “New approaches are currently being imagined through the combination of Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies, such as nanoparticles and other advanced materials”

* “blanket the planet with communications pathways that could help connect the more than 4 billion people still lacking online access”

* “will only come about through improved global governance” “Some form of effective global governance”

* “Individuals used to identify their lives most closely with a place, an ethnic group, a particular culture or even a language. The advent of online engagement and increased exposure to ideas from other cultures means that identities are now more fungible than previously… Thanks to the combination of historical migration patterns and low-cost connectivity, family structures are being redefined”

His new book, Covid-19: The Great Reset (2019)... * “a succinct predictive analysis provided to private investors, global CEOs and opinion- and decision-makers”

* “conjectures and ideas about what the post-pandemic world might, and perhaps should, look like” “The Great Reset

* “World War II was the quintessential transformational war, triggering not only fundamental changes to the global order and the global economy, but also entailing radical shifts in social attitudes and beliefs that eventually paved the way for radically new policies and social contract provisions (like women joining the workforce before becoming voters). There are obviously fundamental dissimilarities between a pandemic and a war (that we will consider in some detail in the following pages), but the magnitude of their transformative power is comparable. Both have the potential to be a transformative crisis of previously unimaginable proportions”

* “This is what happened after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. All around the world, new security measures like employing widespread cameras, requiring electronic ID cards and logging employees or visitors in and out became the norm. At that time, these measures were deemed extreme, but today they are used everywhere and considered ‘normal'”

* “Some leaders and decision-makers who were already at the forefront of the fight against climate change may want to take advantage of the shock inflicted by the pandemic to implement long-lasting and wider environmental changes. They will, in effect, make ‘good use’ of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste"

* “It is our defining moment” “Many things will change forever”. “A new world will emerge”. “The societal upheaval unleashed by COVID-19 will last for years, and possibly generations”. “Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never”

* "Radical changes of such consequence are coming that some pundits have referred to a ‘before coronavirus’ (BC) and ‘after coronavirus’ (AC) era. ... In so doing, they will shape a ‘new normal’ radically different from the one we will be progressively leaving behind. Many of our beliefs and assumptions about what the world could or should look like will be shattered in the process"

* “new ways of using technology to change behavior” “The scale and breadth of the unfolding technological revolution will usher in economic, social and cultural changes of such phenomenal proportions that they are almost impossible to envisage”.

* “At first glance, the pandemic and the environment might seem to be only distantly related cousins; but they are much closer and more intertwined than we think” “they are global in nature and therefore can only be properly addressed in a globally coordinated fashion”.

* “A policy paper prepared by Systemiq in collaboration with the World Economic Forum estimates that building the nature-positive economy could represent more than $10 trillion per year by 2030… Resetting the environment should not be seen as a cost, but rather as an investment that will generate economic activity and employment opportunities”.

* “This crucial difference between the respective time-horizons of a pandemic and that of climate change and nature loss means that a pandemic risk requires immediate action that will be followed by a rapid result, while climate change and nature loss also require immediate action, but the result (or ‘future reward’, in the jargon of economists) will only follow with a certain time lag”.

* “The pandemic will mark a turning point by accelerating this transition. It has crystallized the issue and made a return to the pre-pandemic status quo impossible”. (110)

* “With the pandemic, the ‘digital transformation’ that so many analysts have been referring to for years, without being exactly sure what it meant, has found its catalyst. One major effect of confinement will be the expansion and progression of the digital world in a decisive and often permanent manner.

* “Consumers need products and, if they can’t shop, they will inevitably resort to purchasing them online. As the habit kicks in, people who had never shopped online before will become comfortable with doing so, while people who were part-time online shoppers before will presumably rely on it more.This accelerating growth of e-commerce means that the giants of the online retail industry are likely to emerge from the crisis even stronger than they were in the pre-pandemic era”. " It is not by accident that firms like Alibaba, Amazon, Netflix or Zoom emerged as ‘winners’ from the lockdowns”.

* “The pandemic may prove to be a boon for online education,” “In Asia, the shift to online education has been particularly notable, with a sharp increase in students’ digital enrolments, much higher valuation for online education businesses and more capital available for ‘ed-tech’ start-ups… In the summer of 2020, the direction of the trend seems clear: the world of education, like for so many other industries, will become partly virtual”. “The combined market value of the leading tech companies hit record after record during the lockdowns, even rising back above levels before the outbreak started… this phenomenon is unlikely to abate any time soon, quite the opposite”.

* “The necessity to address the pandemic with any means available (plus, during the outbreak, the need to protect health workers by allowing them to work remotely) removed some of the regulatory and legislative impediments related to the adoption of telemedicine”

* “To date governments have often slowed the pace of adoption of new technologies by lengthy ponderings about what the best regulatory framework should look like but, as the example of telemedicine and drone delivery is now showing, a dramatic acceleration forced by necessity is possible. During the lockdowns, a quasi-global relaxation of regulations that had previously hampered progress in domains where the technology had been available for years suddenly happened because there was no better or other choice available. What was until recently unthinkable suddenly became possible… New regulations will stay in place”.

* “In April 2020, just as the pandemic began to engulf the world, governments across the globe had announced stimulus programmes amounting to several trillion dollars, as if eight or nine Marshall Plans had been put into place almost simultaneously”. “COVID-19 has rewritten many of the rules of the game between the public and private sectors. … The benevolent (or otherwise) greater intrusion of governments in the life of companies and the conduct of their business will be country- and industry-dependent, therefore taking many different guises” “Measures that would have seemed inconceivable prior to the pandemic may well become standard around the world as governments try to prevent the economic recession from turning into a catastrophic depression.

* “Increasingly, there will be calls for government to act as a ‘payer of last resort’ to prevent or stem the spate of mass layoffs and business destruction triggered by the pandemic. All these changes are altering the rules of the economic and monetary policy ‘game’.” “One of the great lessons of the past five centuries in Europe and America is this: acute crises contribute to boosting the power of the state. It’s always been the case and there is no reason why it should be different with the COVID-19 pandemic”. “Looking to the future, governments will most likely, but with different degrees of intensity, decide that it’s in the best interest of society to rewrite some of the rules of the game and permanently increase their role”.

* : “The corporate move will be towards greater surveillance; for better or for worse, companies will be watching and sometimes recording what their workforce does. The trend could take many different forms, from measuring body temperatures with thermal cameras to monitoring via an app how employees comply with social distancing”

* “The next hurdle is the political challenge of vaccinating enough people worldwide (we are collectively as strong as the weakest link) with a high enough compliance rate despite the rise of anti-vaxxers”.

This will be the post covid era which Biden and others I mentioned are striving for. As i said, it is public knowledge. You can ignore it but it will still consume you.


Hard pass- not even worth the time to read.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.