Trump speaks on the Rittenhouse case

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

Subduction Zone said:
I was disappointed with the way that he was charged and predicted this verdict. They charged him too quickly. It should have been rather obvious that the self defense claims were well justified, but I think that he should have been charged with a general endangerment charge. Now he walks due to incompetence by the prosecution.

He endangered criminals

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

He legally shot criminals who attacked him. Their illegal attacks are the only thing he endangered

Desk trauma · Nov 22, 2021

IWalkAlone said:
The fact is Kyle defended himself. What law says he wasn't allowed to be there?

The dusk to dawn curfew declared by the sheriff at the time.

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

Desk trauma said:
The dusk to dawn curfew declared by the sheriff at the time.

Charge him with breaking curfew then, not murder. He was a minor being chased by a child molester and a fellow with a gun. Whats the liberal response? Charge the child with murder.

Gregory Thompson · Nov 22, 2021

IceJad said:
That's more than can be said about fallout 76.

What I've heard and seen of Fallout 76 reminds me of fallout tactics, not a real fallout.

wonderkins · Nov 22, 2021

cow451 said:
Rittenhouse had no business there. He had no personal stake and nothing to offer except for more violence. He was thrill seeking. He was stupid at best, reckless at worst.

Pretty sure he worked in Kenosha. And pretty sure he said in trial that his dad and other family lived there. That sounds like a personal stake. He was also providing help to the community in the middle of the riot. The kid providing medical help, cleaning graffiti, and putting out fires is not the problem.

wonderkins · Nov 22, 2021

If Kyle was such a threat, why did the felons chase after him instead of getting out of there? They never had to go after him. Kyle had every opportunity to shoot as many people as possible if that was why he was there like the media and other liberals want us to believe. But he didn't.

Subduction Zone · Nov 22, 2021

IWalkAlone said:
He endangered criminals

That does not matter. Criminals still have rights. That is why even though Rittenhouse may have broken the law by having his gun the way that he had it he still had a right to self defense. Also, not all of the rioters were "criminals".

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

Subduction Zone said:
That does not matter. Criminals still have rights. That is why even though Rittenhouse may have broken the law by having his gun the way that he had it he still had a right to self defense. Also, not all of the rioters were "criminals".

let me elaborate. He endangered criminals involved in criminal acts, like attacking him.

Subduction Zone · Nov 22, 2021

IWalkAlone said:
let me elaborate. He endangered criminals involved in criminal acts, like attacking him.

He could legally endanger those that attacked him. He could not endanger everyone. Unfortunately the gun laws of Wisconsin have too many holes in them. I have no problem with the self defense claim, but he should not have been there in the first place with a gun that appears to have been obtained illegally. Do you know how he got that gun?

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

Subduction Zone said:
He could legally endanger those that attacked him. He could not endanger everyone. Unfortunately the gun laws of Wisconsin have too many holes in them. I have no problem with the self defense claim, but he should not have been there in the first place with a gun that appears to have been obtained illegally. Do you know how he got that gun?

His friend gave him the gun. Its not murder. They attacked him.

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

If this were a black kid who shot criminals who attacked him, would you want him charged with murder?

Subduction Zone · Nov 22, 2021

IWalkAlone said:
His friend gave him the gun. Its not murder. They attacked him.

So you do not know how he got the gun illegally. And you are not paying attention. I do not think that he should have been charged with murder. That was an over reaction and an attempt to legally lynch him. That does not mean the he was totally innocent.

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

Subduction Zone said:
So you do not know how he got the gun illegally. And you are not paying attention. I do not think that he should have been charged with murder. That was an over reaction and an attempt to legally lynch him. That does not mean the he was totally innocent.

What law did he break?

Desk trauma · Nov 22, 2021

IWalkAlone said:
Charge him with breaking curfew then, not murder. He was a minor being chased by a child molester and a fellow with a gun. Whats the liberal response? Charge the child with murder.

Putting 'liberals are horrible poopoo heads' in your signature would save a lot of time.

IWalkAlone · Nov 22, 2021

Desk trauma said:
Putting 'liberals are horrible poopoo heads' in your signature would save a lot of time.

Or "liberals can't take criticism"

stevil · Nov 22, 2021

Thatgirloncfforums said:
It seems like Kyle was simply protecting himself,

He would have protected himself in a much less dramatic fashion if he had simply stayed home. He had no valid reason to be there with a semi auto rifle confronting the rioters or protesters.

Stay home. If you want to help, come back the morning after and help with the clean up.

cow451 · Nov 22, 2021

wonderkins said:
Pretty sure he worked in Kenosha. And pretty sure he said in trial that his dad and other family lived there. That sounds like a personal stake. He was also providing help to the community in the middle of the riot. The kid providing medical help, cleaning graffiti, and putting out fires is not the problem.

He is a high school dropout working as a lifeguard. His resume includes being in a cop cadet program in high school. His parents lived 30 minutes away. I don’t think he owned any part of any of the businesses. Once he brought a lethal weapon to the riot, he stopped being a good guy.

rturner76 · Nov 22, 2021

IWalkAlone said:
The fact is Kyle defended himself. What law says he wasn't allowed to be there?

I guess there's no law against making dunb decisions

cow451 · Nov 22, 2021

Pavel Mosko said:
I count myself in that fan base.

95% of the fan base is there because they do not want the right of self defense to be gutted beyond recognition. 1)The Rittenhouse verdict was important considering what was they were trying to also do with the Mcloskey's for simply defending their home in Missouri.

Missouri Governor Pardons St. Louis Couple Who Aimed Guns at Protesters

2) Besides that we do not want social justice mob violence and coercion to be normalized in our society as a way for lobbying for progressive causes and considered something that is their due the way they look at illegal immigration as a right, and some even looting by some (considered simply a means of wealth redistribution to the working class). It it ironic all the "To kill a Mockingbird" type movies, news articles etc. but the left has their own version of this when it comes to trying to coerce the outcomes of court trials, and the policy of politicians.

3) By the way it is also ironic considering what has been done for the trespassers of Jan 6 they through the book at them in a way, they never did for all the leftwing thugs, arsonists, rioters and looters of 2020. Their were so many more deaths and injuries and major crimes occurring at the CHOP / CHAZ, George Floyd zone, Portland autonomous zone than the "Capitol riot" and most of these were never charged!

I actually think based on the circumstantial evidence like film clips that much of the damage of Jan 6, was due to Antifa and BLM folks infiltrating the Trump protest and doing things like removing crowd barriers, breaking windows, and throwing rocks.

https://twitter.com/collegehumor/status/961344971206004737?s=21

Trump speaks on the Rittenhouse case

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic

Well-Known Member

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.

Active Member

Active Member

Regular Member

Well-Known Member

Regular Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Regular Member

Well-Known Member

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic

Well-Known Member

Godless and without morals

Standing with Ukraine.

Domine non-sum dignus

Standing with Ukraine.

Similar threads