Christian Universalism. What's not to like?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, it is encouraging that UR is gaining popularity and I don't think that's surprising once all the tired strawman that surround it are dispensed with.
Yes. I think 90% of those who object, don't even understand it. I have to call them on their ignorance. The education we provide is very helpful. I don't ask them to believe me straight away, if they could only TRY to understand us. (UR that is) I have a lot more respect for someone that objects from an informed position.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes seriously. What did Jesus say?
Do you really believe that a modern English paraphrase, of a biased translation, accurately represents what Jesus actually said?

I know, I know... where does that leave you? (with a rational mind, I suppose) The tendency is to regurgitate scriptures without THINKING about what they mean in the larger picture.
 
Upvote 0

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
34
Shropshire
✟186,379.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
The link worked for me. Thanks.
I smiled when I saw the photo of Robin with a proper cup of tea. (pinky out for balance)

Where there is tea, there is hope.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but rather so that through him, the world might be saved.
How do you deal with this contradiction in the "scripture" you quoted?

It plainly says that God did not send Jesus to judge the world, but rather to save the world. Sent to save, not judge. And to save what? The world.

Was Jesus sent to save half the world? Or the micro-fraction claimed by Infernalists? Or, as it says, was he sent to save the world, the WHOLE world.

And if this was his mission, and I believe it was, did he succeed, or fail?

Did Jesus fail to save the world that God sent him to save? (nope)

1 John 4:14
And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Savior of the world.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
34
Shropshire
✟186,379.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
"The sun never sets on the English empire.", as the saying goes. - lol

Here's C.S. Lewis on the subject, quite funny:

"You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me.”
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,067
9,928
The Keep
✟581,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If that is all you got from this thread then you have been operating on auto pilot. I have been engaged in this thread for quite some time and I can only recall 2-3 times when anyone said anything like your final paragraph.
.....Here is my main objection UR cannot be supported by any single verse/passage where God, Himself, or Jesus, Himself, unequivocally says words to the effect, "All mankind will be saved, righteous and unrighteous alike even after death."
I don't mean something written by a prophet or a NT disciple but something that begins "God said...." or 'Jesus, said..."
Jesus taught e.g.,
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41
• "these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "the fire of hell [Γέεννα/gehenna] where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, 3 times Mark 9:43-48"
• "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6
• “And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24
• “But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.” Luke 10:12​
…..These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned a then existing significant Jewish view of eternal hell.
In Matt. 18:6, 26:24 and Luk 10:12, see above, Jesus teaches that there is a punishment worse than death or nonexistence.
…..A punishment worse than death without mercy is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.
Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
…..how much sorer punishment,””Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord,””It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” these certainly do not sound like everyone will be saved, no matter what.
…..Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He intended to say eternal death, in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.
….The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, see Acts of the apostles 23:8. They knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that it was permanent and often it did not involve punishment.
When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” the Sadducees would not have understood it as simply death, it would have meant something worse to them.
…..Re: Matt 25:46 concerning “punishment” one early church father wrote,
“Then these reap no advantage from their punishment, as it seems: moreover, I would say that they are not punished unless they are conscious of the punishment.” Justin Martyr [A.D. 110-165.] Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 4​
…..Jesus undoubtedly knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If that Jewish teaching was wrong, why wouldn’t Jesus tell them there was no hell, no eternal punishment etc? Why would Jesus teach “eternal punishment,” etc. to Jews who believed, "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity," which would only encourage and reinforce their beliefs in “hell”?
"The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity"[/i] (Judith xvi. 17).​

In reading all of the Old Testament prophets, you might see some striking similarities in what they said before the Babylonian invasion, to what Jesus said before the Roman invasion. Try to view Jesus as Israel's last prophet and judge before their final destruction, and you might see some of those verses in a different light.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How do you deal with this contradiction in the "scripture" you quoted?

It plainly says that God did not send Jesus to judge the world, but rather to save the world. Sent to save, not judge. And to save what? The world.

Was Jesus sent to save half the world? Or the micro-fraction claimed by Infernalists? Or, as it says, was he sent to save the world, the WHOLE world.

And if this was his mission, and I believe it was, did he succeed, or fail?

Did Jesus fail to save the world that God sent him to save? (nope)

1 John 4:14
And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Savior of the world.
@rjs330
If the primary mission was to save rather than judge, does that put love, or justice at the forefront? Jesus didn't come to judge the world, he came to save it. (love)

Therefore, love, not justice, is the primary mission. God is compassionate and merciful. (Romans 9:15) Compassion means we get the good things we don't deserve. Mercy means we don't get the bad things we deserve.

What's not to like? (as the forum topic asks)
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,067
9,928
The Keep
✟581,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Here's C.S. Lewis on the subject, quite funny:

"You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me.”

Who's C.S. Lewis?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lazarus Short

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2016
2,934
3,009
74
Independence, Missouri, USA
✟294,142.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The love versus judgment or mercy versus judgment argument reminds me of what I wrote about Psalm 136:

Psalm 136
Here I read (26 times!) this: “…his mercy endureth for ever.” Compare this God of mercy to the Hell theory god, who grants us our precious Free Will, and then when we exercise it badly, even in ignorance, He relegates us to Hell with no chance of reprieve. Compare the real Jesus, Who prayed to His Father for the sinners who were killing Him, to the Jesus of Mary K. Baxter who tells the damned in so many words, “Too bad, you screwed up, and here you are.” (Yes, I did read her book.) For that matter, take a look at the behavior of Jesus’ early followers, in the days when universal reconciliation (or whatever term they used at the time) was orthodoxy, versus the violence, torture, and bloodshed which later set in after the Hell theory became dominant. I know that during this period, entire nations disappeared from history, and others nearly did, for what the Church considered heresy. You see, gentle reader, either the Hell theory is correct, or God’s mercy endures forever – both cannot be true at the same time. If God’s mercy does endure forever, and I believe it does, then people cannot be sent to ECT, whatever excuses some may make for it – burning the wicked to ashes is more merciful, but as we shall see, God has more mercy in store for us than that. Let me say it again, for it bears repeating: universal reconciliation is mercy, annihilation is mercy (sort of), but eternal torture cannot be mercy. Psalm 136 and the Hell theory cannot both be true, and Psalm 136 is true.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Hmm
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Get my point, Web-Maker ???
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,160
9,957
The Void!
✟1,131,176.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Alright. So, I'm convinced that you guys are convinced that U.R. is the right way to interpret an imperfect Bible.

So, now what's next on the agenda for study? Where do you guys want to take us from here?

And where did Cormack disappear to?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
34
Shropshire
✟186,379.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
So, now what's next on the agenda for study? Where do you guys want to take us from here?

There's no agenda and nobody wants to take you anywhere. It's called a discussion.
.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

2PhiloVoid

Get my point, Web-Maker ???
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,160
9,957
The Void!
✟1,131,176.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There's no agenda and nobody wants to take you anywhere. It's called a discussion.
.

Lol! You do know that the term "agenda" has more than one denotation and more than one idiomatic expression, right? I meant it in the other way, the one that means "your plan for learning ..."

So yes, it's a discussion. And I'm asking: "What is it you that you U.R. advocates would like for us to talk about now?" I'm asking because it seems this discussion is going in circles and I'm wondering if there's more you all want us to learn or respond to.

Or, am I just supposed to sit in my chair, pondering how 'deficient' I am as a 'fellow' Christian (or, in the opinion of others, reamain a Christian wanna-be who can't quite cut the mustard ... )
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Get my point, Web-Maker ???
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,160
9,957
The Void!
✟1,131,176.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
An imperfect Bible? Come again...?

... well yeah. At least one among you is implying that the Bible and its contents have to be questioned and that, furthermore, it's only by the proper measure of having the Holy Spirit that anyone is going to come to fully see that U.R. is correct.

Am I wrong about this?
 
Upvote 0

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
34
Shropshire
✟186,379.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
I'm asking because it seems this discussion is going in circles and I'm wondering if there's more you all want us to learn or respond to.

Again, there is no hidden agenda and nobody is trying to get you to learn anything, and you are free to respond or not, as you wish.

Or, am I just supposed to sit in my chair, pondering how 'deficient' I am as a 'fellow' Christian (or as a Christian wanna-be who can't quite cut the mustard ... )

Are you sure you're not projecting something here? No-one's trying to make you feel "deficient".

Anything to say about the actual topic? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

2PhiloVoid

Get my point, Web-Maker ???
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,160
9,957
The Void!
✟1,131,176.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Again, there is no hidden agenda and nobody is trying to get you to learn anything, and you are free to respond or not, as you wish.
Well again, I just explained to you that I don't think you have a 'hidden agenda.' I used the term in a different idiomatic way than that by which you seem to have interpreted me to have meant.

Are you sure you're not projecting something here? No-one's trying to make you feel "deficient".

Anything to say about the actual topic or are you going to continue being disruptive?

My apologies, Hmm. I'm not actually attempting to be disruptive. I'm asking what I think are pertinent questions. But if you disagree with my line of thinking, then please tell me what it is that you'd like for us to discuss further.

Is there anything about U.R. that you want us to talk about that hasn't already been discussed as yet in this thread?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.