Hello
@dms1972, the Lord (in v19-20), continues on with what He began to teach us in John 3:18, by speaking of unbelievers who love the darkness and chose to remain in it (because they are afraid that they/their sinful deeds will be exposed by the light). For them, who reject the light (~reject the Savior~),
there no longer remains a sacrifice for their sins (so in this sense, they cannot be saved ..
Hebrews 10:26-27).
These are contrasted (in v21) who those of us who want our deeds to be seen by others (like the light from a city on a hill), for the sake of the saints to be (if you will, IOW, for the sake of those who are still living in darkness, but who will not remain there
), and for God's glory (because these works, as v21 makes plain, were
wrought in God .. cf Ephesians 2:10).
Perhaps you would enjoy reading what Dr. Morris has to say about all of this from his excellent commentary on the Gospel of John? If so, here you go
19 Faced with the light (see on John 1:4) that has come into the world people may prefer the darkness. John is not saying that God has decreed that people who do such and such things are condemned. It is not God’s sentence with which he is concerned here. He is telling us rather how the process works.
People choose the darkness and their condemnation lies in that very fact.
They shut themselves up to darkness; they choose to live in darkness; they cut themselves off from the light. Why? “Because their deeds were evil.”
Immersed in wrongdoing, they have no wish to be disturbed. They refuse to be shaken out of their comfortable sinfulness. So they reject the light that comes to them and set their love (aorist tense) on darkness. Thereby they condemn themselves.
There is a certain emphasis on “light” in this section. In characteristic fashion John makes the concept prominent by repeating the word (it occurs five times in vv. 19–21). We should probably give it a twofold meaning in this verse. There is the usual metaphorical meaning whereby “light” stands for “good” over against “darkness,” which means “evil.” But in this Gospel Christ is the light (1:9; 8:12; 9:5), and John is here speaking of Christ’s coming to this world. The supreme condemnation of the people of his day, John says, was that when Christ, the Light of the world, came to them, they rejected him. They loved the darkness.
This is a place where the teaching of the Qumran scrolls diverges from that of this Gospel. In the scrolls there is a rigid and hopeless determinism. The men of darkness belong to the spirit of error. Their fate deprives them of any power of choice. Willy-nilly they belong to the spirit of error. But John is concerned with meaningful choice, not blind fate. People preferred darkness to light. It was not forced on them; they themselves chose darkness. And in that lies their condemnation.
20 John amplifies his explanation. Why did those who do evil not come to the light? Because all who make a practice of wrongdoing hate the light. John does not hesitate to use the strong term “hates,” a verb he employs 12 times, almost a third of all its New Testament occurrences. This is accounted for largely because he so often sees the sinful world as hating God or Christ or, as here, what they stand for. The strife between good and evil is no tepid affair, but one that elicits the bitter hatred of the forces of evil.
One reason for this is brought out here. To come to the light means to have one’s darkness shown for what it is, and to have it rebuked for what it is. No one likes this uncomfortable process, persistent wrongdoers least of all. The fear of salutary reproof keeps them away from the light. There is a moral basis behind much unbelief. ~Morris, L. (1995). The Gospel according to John (pp. 206–207).
God bless you!
--David
p.s. - here's what he (Dr. Morris) has to say about v21 as well (in case you are interested).
21 Not so “whoever lives by the truth” (for “truth” see Additional Note D, pp. 259–62). More literally this means “he that does the truth,” an unusual expression.
We generally speak of “telling the truth.” It may be that John’s choice of verb is partly due to the need for a contrast with “does evil” (v. 20). But there are actions that are true as well as words. Anyone who habitually performs the actions that can be described as true comes to the light. The deeds of such a person are not those that must be reproved. They are “done through God” (more exactly “in God,” as NRSV), and the light will make this clear to all.
John does not, of course, mean that some people by nature do what is right. He is not teaching salvation by works or by nature. In this very chapter he has reported the words of Jesus that emphasize that not good works, but rebirth, is the way to God.
The person that John has in mind here is the one who responds to the Gospel invitation, the one who has life in Christ (John 3:15). Perhaps we could bring out his meaning by saying that the truth conveyed elsewhere in the New Testament by the doctrine of election underlies this verse. It is only the person on whom God has laid his hand who can truly say that his works are “wrought in God.” And that person will not avoid the light!