Fervent
Well-Known Member
- Sep 22, 2020
- 4,405
- 1,617
- 43
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I will say one final thing rather than responding point to point. Essentially, you have not argued the deficiency, you have argued we should cater to the unhealthy. What I am arguing is we should attend to health, creating expectations of healthy behaviors within the community at large. Openness and trust are healthy behaviors, and so should an ethic that encourages them should be fostered. Does that mean people should be encouraged to blindly trust, or go against their better judgment and trust people they have reason to believe are untrustworthy? No, absolutely not. But it is a basic, community disposition of trust and a habit of making confession to one another that I am proposing, not the extreme caricature you've been "warning" against.I have argued the deficiency. I have pointed out that people who are wounded, broken, traumatised, or otherwise struggling, are harmed by the expectation that they share all of that with all and sundry. Time, space, and relationships of safety and trust are essential to healing.
No. No no no no no. We cannot harm others because of potential benefits. First, do no harm, is as important in the cure of souls as it is in the cure of bodies.
It's not that extreme, though. In most congregations of any size, there will be many people with such needs.
God will bring good out of bad situations, but that does not mean we should not be appropriately self-protective.
Note: the accusation of unbelief is a flame, and likely to get you a warning from the moderators. I suggest you avoid such accusations.
Except it's not good for everyone in all situations, so as an ideal, it's pretty flawed.
I think it's pretty central to the practice of ministry, actually.
I don't think I agree. Pressure to conform - except on the most basic of levels necessary for the existence of a community, as noted above - almost certainly is a problem.
Always there must be free choice, though. Coercion in ministry is abusive.
The restraint needs to be internal, a matter of conscience; not external, a matter of control.
It's both. Expectations in general are suspect, but this particular expectation is especially problematic. Forcing disclosure is a terrible, terrible thing to do to someone.
A disposition of trust is a good thing. It must be allowed to grow naturally, not expecting people to trust before they're ready. To say otherwise is certainly problematic in the ways I've outlined.
Upvote
0