Federal judge temporarily blocks TX abortion law

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,189
16,168
✟1,172,964.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
As ever politics makes for strange bedfellows, The Firearms Policy Coalition has filed an amicus brief siding with those opposing the law. They take no position on abortion but argue, as others have done on this forum, that if let to stand other states will make use of this mechanism to go after second amendment rights.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
54,680
8,035
US
✟1,060,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
As ever politics makes for strange bedfellows, The Firearms Policy Coalition has filed an amicus brief siding with those opposing the law. They take no position on abortion but argue, as others have done on this forum, that if let to stand other states will make use of this mechanism to go after second amendment rights.

Killing babies isn't a right; but if there are some who want to sue gangstas, who are suspected of violating state firearms laws; let them have at it. It's a wonder that all of their living victims haven't sued them for all of the mayhem they spread throughout urban neighborhoods. I wonder why not.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,189
16,168
✟1,172,964.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Killing babies isn't a right; but if there are some who want to sue gangstas, who are suspected of violating state firearms laws; let them have at it. It's a wonder that all of their living victims haven't sued them for all of the mayhem they spread throughout urban neighborhoods. I wonder why not.
The feigned ignorance about Roe is beyond tiresom.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,189
16,168
✟1,172,964.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I feel the same way concerning the Declaration of Independence, and the 9th and 10th Amendments.
Outraged while pretending to know nothing about their contents?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
As ever politics makes for strange bedfellows, The Firearms Policy Coalition has filed an amicus brief siding with those opposing the law. They take no position on abortion but argue, as others have done on this forum, that if let to stand other states will make use of this mechanism to go after second amendment rights.
Wait! You can't do that. You are pitting one single issue "conservative" voter against another.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
54,680
8,035
US
✟1,060,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
When a person can only reply "Nonsense" to a cogent argument he has admitted defeat.

Thank you for owning up to your error.

I often reply "nonsense" to ridiculous bare assertion fallacies; but it was fun to watch you double down.

Thanks for playing.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I often reply "nonsense" to ridiculous bare assertion fallacies; but it was fun to watch you double down.

Thanks for playing.
Incorrect. You also do so to posts that you have no answer to. But then you are doing what one of your sources implied that you would. You are abusing the law to try to support a belief that it does not support at all.

Now what you could have done was to ask me to prove my case. But instead you thought that you could refute it with one word. It does not work that way. By posting as you did you shifted the burden of proof upon yourself. I asked you to prove that it was nonsense. You could not do so.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
54,680
8,035
US
✟1,060,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Incorrect. You also do so to posts that you have no answer to. But then you are doing what one of your sources implied that you would. You are abusing the law to try to support a belief that it does not support at all.

I cited the law to back my assertion. You didn't. Case closed. Game over.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
See: Burden of Proof
That is what I pointed out. You took on the burden of proof with an incorrect "refutation". The proper strategy was to have left the burden of proof upon me, instead you went charging ahead without thinking out the consequences of your post.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
54,680
8,035
US
✟1,060,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
That is what I pointed out. You took on the burden of proof with an incorrect "refutation". The proper strategy was to have left the burden of proof upon me, instead you went charging ahead without thinking out the consequences of your post.



Burden of Proof


A fallacy is when someone makes an argument based on unsound reasoning. Burden of proof is one type of fallacy in which someone makes a claim, but puts the burden of proof onto the other side. For example, a person makes a claim. Another person refutes the claim, and the first person asks them to prove that the claim is not true. In a logical argument, if someone states a claim, it is up to that person to prove the truth of his or her claim.

Burden of Proof Examples
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Burden of Proof


A fallacy is when someone makes an argument based on unsound reasoning. Burden of proof is one type of fallacy in which someone makes a claim, but puts the burden of proof onto the other side. For example, a person makes a claim. Another person refutes the claim, and the first person asks them to prove that the claim is not true. In a logical argument, if someone states a claim, it is up to that person to prove the truth of his or her claim.

Burden of Proof Examples
And you took up the burden of proof by making a statement without any reasoning behind it. Remember? I asked you to support your case to show that you had reasoning behind it. You did not do so. You could have done the same with me, but it is a bit too late for that now.

I did, please note the past tense, have a burden of proof to support my claim, but you did not ask me to do that. You took on the burden of proof all on your own with your own unsupported claim.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
54,680
8,035
US
✟1,060,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
And you took up the burden of proof by making a statement without any reasoning behind it. Remember? I asked you to support your case to show that you had reasoning behind it. You did not do so. You could have done the same with me, but it is a bit too late for that now.

I did, please note the past tense, have a burden of proof to support my claim, but you did not ask me to do that. You took on the burden of proof all on your own with your own unsupported claim.

Burden of Proof


A fallacy is when someone makes an argument based on unsound reasoning. Burden of proof is one type of fallacy in which someone makes a claim, but puts the burden of proof onto the other side. For example, a person makes a claim. Another person refutes the claim, and the first person asks them to prove that the claim is not true. In a logical argument, if someone states a claim, it is up to that person to prove the truth of his or her claim.

Burden of Proof Examples

re·fute | \ ri-ˈfyüt \
refuted; refuting
Definition of refute
transitive verb

1 : to prove wrong by argument or evidence : show to be false or erroneous
2 : to deny the truth or accuracy of
refuted the allegations

Definition of REFUTE

Your move.
 
Upvote 0