bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,184
1,809
✟802,726.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell, the early Christians were pacifists and that seemed to be what Jesus wanted.
He wanted his followers to turn the other cheek, he didn't want his followers to fight with the sword, or for people to be stoned to death...There might have been a bit of whipping with chords and overturning tables... but no killing or extreme violence...

Should Christians stick to this today?
Yes/no/maybe?
What is the biblical message about this?
Yes
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,451
26,881
Pacific Northwest
✟731,998.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
St. Basil ( the great) provided counsels for the military. It seems that as an extreme last resort that force was a regrettable necessity. Perhaps this is what the Lord means in Luke 22:36-38.

Incommunion » St. Basil’s Guidance on War and Repentance

I found St. John Chrysostom's commentary here quite useful. He points to the hardships that the disciples will face after our Lord has ascended--as we can read about in the Acts of the Apostles. But Christ dismisses the swords, because certainly two swords among a group of twelve (soon to be eleven) men would hardly be enough to actually use against a real confrontation. And we know that the apostles never made use of the sword against their persecutors. The Lord's words are meant to indicate that they must make prepare themselves for the long haul as His apostles--before He had told them to carry nothing as they went among the towns and villages, that they would be provided for. But now, now the time was at hand that they must face the long journey as His ambassadors among the nations.

He was sending them out among hungry wolves; that life that awaited them was going to be the cross He Himself had told them to carry. It wasn't the purse, or daggers, etc that was what really mattered; but rather what mattered was that He was telling them that things were going to get dangerous for them, and they should be prepared for that.

-CryptoLutheran
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Lukaris
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
4,396
5,093
New Jersey
✟335,809.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell, the early Christians were pacifists and that seemed to be what Jesus wanted.
He wanted his followers to turn the other cheek, he didn't want his followers to fight with the sword, or for people to be stoned to death...There might have been a bit of whipping with chords and overturning tables... but no killing or extreme violence...

Should Christians stick to this today?
Yes/no/maybe?
What is the biblical message about this?

One of the important principles here, which Jesus emphasized repeatedly, is that we are to love our neighbors as ourselves, and this includes those neighbors who are trying to harm us. We are called to actively work for the good of all the people that our life touches, even our enemies and persecutors.

I don't know if there are rare exceptions in which violence is consistent with this principle. Occasionally, violence seems to be the least among evils, and I truly don't know what Jesus would say to that.

But it's hard for me to see how taking up arms against the people of another nation is consistent with loving them and working for their good. So, yes, I see pacifism as the purest implementation of the teachings of Jesus.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sunshinee777
Upvote 0

James_Lai

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2021
1,100
265
38
Ontario
✟24,480.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell, the early Christians were pacifists and that seemed to be what Jesus wanted.
He wanted his followers to turn the other cheek, he didn't want his followers to fight with the sword, or for people to be stoned to death...There might have been a bit of whipping with chords and overturning tables... but no killing or extreme violence...

Should Christians stick to this today?
Yes/no/maybe?
What is the biblical message about this?
I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell, the early Christians were pacifists and that seemed to be what Jesus wanted.
He wanted his followers to turn the other cheek, he didn't want his followers to fight with the sword, or for people to be stoned to death...There might have been a bit of whipping with chords and overturning tables... but no killing or extreme violence...

Should Christians stick to this today?
Yes/no/maybe?
What is the biblical message about this?

Leo Tolstoi is one of the most famous proponents of Christian non-violence. He spent many years studying the Gospels and the NT and came to the conclusion that the only solution to solve the perpetual vicious cycle of violence is rejecting all forms of violence based on Jesus’ “turn the other cheek” principle.

He believed that people are not violent if they have love and compassion in their hearts, not because they’re scared of punishment. Instead, punishment only increases violence.

Tolstoi’s teaching came down to: never use violence against anybody, don’t serve the government, don’t serve in the army or the police, don’t take part in armed fight against the government. Be concerned only with your moral self-improvement. He believed this is the only worthy path for a human being that Jesus Christ has called us to follow.

People criticized him for utopism. However, Mahatma Gandhi studied Tolstoi’s views and put them into practice. He asked the Indian people to stop all violence. Instead, he asked them, do not serve the British, do not pay them taxes and do not engage with the British administration. This brought down the British rule over the subcontinent in only three years.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sunshinee777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2020
1,803
2,003
Finland
✟168,856.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell, the early Christians were pacifists and that seemed to be what Jesus wanted.
He wanted his followers to turn the other cheek, he didn't want his followers to fight with the sword, or for people to be stoned to death...There might have been a bit of whipping with chords and overturning tables... but no killing or extreme violence...

Should Christians stick to this today?
Yes/no/maybe?
What is the biblical message about this?

I have been thinking this quite a lot.
I mean, personally I think we should never use violence (words can be violent too) against anybody BUT I struggle to find out is it ok according to bible to defent for example your friend or family members with violence if they are attacked? We obviously can’t just sit and watch when things like that happens? Or do we? What I want to believe, is that God will fight for us, ( “The LORD shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace.” )
and there is several verses supporting this, and that’s the way I would want to live. (And I have been living like this and also felt God is fighting for me)
So, im not sure?
 
Upvote 0