Another loss for Biden Administration

hhodgson

Semper-fi
Site Supporter
Sep 20, 2011
1,948
387
75
Delphos, Ohio
✟613,432.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution

Absolutely Awesome! "No weapon formed against our nation in (Jesus Name) will prosper." I believe I receive!
typing smiley.gif



Word of Faith Icon.gif

Words of Faith
 
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,915
14,012
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,015.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I digress -

How many losses in the courts is it now?

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Biden - They Just Halted His Discrimination Order Handing Out Federal Aid

oh, here is another:

Supreme Court rules against Biden administration, protects Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy

here is another:

SCOTUS’s ruling, which the Examiner called a “well-deserved and humiliating defeat to the Biden administration” caused all nine justices to side against the administration saying that the administration should be required to uphold the law of the land.

Federal court tells Biden administration that it’s illegal to discriminate against white farmers
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,418
16,420
✟1,190,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You must define babies as a virus before you can argue that abortion is medical treatment for the good of a womans health.
Comparing the risk of bringing a normal pregnancy to term would work as would cases such as ectopic pregnancy or similar cases where continuing the pregnancy is a direct threat to the woman's health.
 
Upvote 0

saulus paulus

Active Member
Oct 13, 2021
29
12
48
jonkoping
✟15,761.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Comparing the risk of bringing a normal pregnancy to term would work as would cases such as ectopic pregnancy or similar cases where continuing the pregnancy is a direct threat to the woman's health.
No. Abortion to save a life is not contested. This is the usual strawman that all states abortionlaws accepts. You understood my point, want to argue that, or talk to yourself in your strawman. Do not have time to strawmen. Life is short. And this falls outside a womans choice also, because this falls on a doctors oath to save a life no matter what the pregnant woman says. Unless she has religious grounds for going through a pregnancy that will most likely end her life. No need for laws that docors are mandated to do, unless they want to lose their license to practice medicine. Bad strawman, very boring.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,418
16,420
✟1,190,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
No. Abortion to save a life is not contested.

That exception was not included in the post I responded to.

You understood my point, want to argue that, or talk to yourself in your strawman.

I took it at face value when you posted that abortion could not be classed as medical treatment without "define babies as a virus".
 
Upvote 0

saulus paulus

Active Member
Oct 13, 2021
29
12
48
jonkoping
✟15,761.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
You are free to be disho
That exception was not included in the post I responded to.



I took it at face value when you posted that abortion could not be classed as medical treatment without "define babies as a virus".
[Staff Edit] I am not entertaining it. You took out of context to make a strawman, and you do it again. Not discussing them, asked and elaborately answered. To deal with your latest dodge from your strawman, I did not say that abortion could not be classified as a medical treatment wothout being called a virus. I stated that doctors take oaths to save lives at all costs, so abortion is included in my reply. Which makes your strawman mute. You attempted to pivot it off to a non issue that none contest, bipartisan support, that will get doctors disbarred if they break, and will probably give them jailtime if they break. Not interesting to discuss the pointless outside the bounds of reality. Why do you want to discuss that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,418
16,420
✟1,190,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
[Staff Edit] I am not entertaining it. You took out of context to make a strawman, and you do it again. Not discussing them, asked and elaborately answered. To deal with your latest dodge from your strawman, I did not say that abortion could not be classified as a medical treatment wothout being called a virus. I stated that doctors take oaths to save lives at all costs, so abortion is included in my reply. Which makes your strawman mute. You attempted to pivot it off to a non issue that none contest, bipartisan support, that will get doctors disbarred if they break, and will probably give them jailtime if they break. Not interesting to discuss the pointless outside the bounds of reality. Why do you want to discuss that?

Not being in possession of psychic powers I can only go off what you post, the post I replied to did not have the exception you insist I should know was there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: pacomascarot
Upvote 0