What profit is there in reading the historical books more than once?

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,475
USA
✟677,608.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Thing is since it's just first names, you can't even really associate important events with those names all the time because first names get repeated a lot.
Jesus is in fact sharing the same name as Joshua, just they used the Greek translation of the name rather than the name itself.
David had 2 Jeremiahs in his army in I Chronicles, neither is the prophet Jeremiah that lived during King Josiah's time hundreds of years later.

So in those first chapters of Chronicles.. it really is just spitting a bunch of first names out in a list.

But for some reason, the writer of those scriptures felt it important to include those two Jeremiahs. Why? Who were they really? Do we know? Can we find out through other sources? What (if any) is the significance of Jesus and Joshua sharing the same name?

I'm not asking you or anyone these questions as they are just examples of what goes through my mind when reading, but when we come up with questions like these and seek and study scripture with them in mind, the Spirit may guide us in new directions and new revelation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: pescador
Upvote 0

pescador

Wise old man
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2011
8,530
4,776
✟498,844.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
There is much profit in reading and rereading any parts of scripture as God continues to reveal new things as we gain in spiritual maturity and understanding. Once we think we already know it all, then we know nothing.

What spiritual maturity and understanding does one gain by reading extensive genealogies? They were relevant in ancient Hebraic culture, but I don't see their value for today. I am James, son of Edward, grandson of Robert, grandson of Arthur, etc. Do you care?
 
Upvote 0

pescador

Wise old man
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2011
8,530
4,776
✟498,844.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Numbers:20-46, "The descendants of Reuben, the firstborn son of Israel: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name individually. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Reuben were 46,500.

From the descendants of Simeon: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males numbered of them twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name individually. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Simeon were 59,300.

From the descendants of Gad: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Gad were 45,650.

From the descendants of Judah: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Judah were 74,600.

From the descendants of Issachar: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Issachar were 54,400.

From the descendants of Zebulun: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Zebulun were 57,400.

From the sons of Joseph:

From the descendants of Ephraim: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Ephraim were 40,500. From the descendants of Manasseh: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Manasseh were 32,200.

From the descendants of Benjamin: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Benjamin were 35,400.

From the descendants of Dan: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Dan were 62,700.

From the descendants of Asher: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Asher were 41,500.

From the descendants of Naphtali: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Naphtali were 53,400.

These were the men whom Moses and Aaron numbered along with the twelve leaders of Israel, each of whom was from his own family. All the Israelites who were twenty years old or older, who could serve in Israel’s army, were numbered according to their families. And all those numbered totaled 603,550."

Bored yet? If not, what great insight have you gained?
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,475
USA
✟677,608.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Numbers:20-46, "The descendants of Reuben, the firstborn son of Israel: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name individually. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Reuben were 46,500.

From the descendants of Simeon: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males numbered of them twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name individually. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Simeon were 59,300.

From the descendants of Gad: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Gad were 45,650.

From the descendants of Judah: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Judah were 74,600.

From the descendants of Issachar: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Issachar were 54,400.

From the descendants of Zebulun: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Zebulun were 57,400.

From the sons of Joseph:

From the descendants of Ephraim: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Ephraim were 40,500. From the descendants of Manasseh: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Manasseh were 32,200.

From the descendants of Benjamin: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Benjamin were 35,400.

From the descendants of Dan: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Dan were 62,700.

From the descendants of Asher: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Asher were 41,500.

From the descendants of Naphtali: According to the records of their clans and families, all the males twenty years old or older who could serve in the army were listed by name. Those of them who were numbered from the tribe of Naphtali were 53,400.

These were the men whom Moses and Aaron numbered along with the twelve leaders of Israel, each of whom was from his own family. All the Israelites who were twenty years old or older, who could serve in Israel’s army, were numbered according to their families. And all those numbered totaled 603,550."

Bored yet? If not, what great insight have you gained?

Nothing by just reading a post on the internet quoting the genealogies, but when you read scripture, including the genealogies, with an open heart and an open mind to the Spirit's teachings, you may receive insight (or you may not at that time.)

But I can look at that last one and see "twenty years old or older" and find that interesting. I might ask myself. Why age twenty? Was that something written elsewhere in Mosaic law or was it part of their culture even before they left Egypt? Or was it part of the general culture of the surrounding nations including the Israelites?

I read again later and find it interesting that they were numbered according to their families and reflect on what that may mean.

At another time I might look at all the numbers that have been totaled in each of those paragraphs and compare the larger to the smaller and perhaps see some significance in that. Was it simply because they were smaller (or larger) or were they smaller due to some other reason.

I might also reflect on which of the sons of these personages were left out (if any) and why? Can something be learned from their absence, and does it have any relation to some of the names that are listed much later in the book of Revelation?

Maybe you are inspired into something new that you hadn't realized before or maybe you are not, but it is valuable all the same.
 
Upvote 0

pescador

Wise old man
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2011
8,530
4,776
✟498,844.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Have you forgotten this part of Scripture...

"David felt guilty after he had numbered the army. David said to the Lord, “I have sinned greatly by doing this! Now, O Lord, please remove the guilt of your servant, for I have acted very foolishly.”

When David got up the next morning, the Lord’s message had already come to the prophet Gad, David’s seer: “Go, tell David, ‘This is what the Lord has said: I am offering you three forms of judgment. Pick one of them and I will carry it out against you.’”

Gad went to David and told him, “Shall seven years of famine come upon your land? Or shall you flee for three months from your enemies with them in hot pursuit? Or shall there be three days of plague in your land? Now decide what I should tell the one who sent me.” David said to Gad, “I am very upset! I prefer that we be attacked by the Lord, for his mercy is great; I do not want to be attacked by human hands!”

So the Lord sent a plague through Israel from the morning until the completion of the appointed time, and 70,000 people died from Dan to Beer Sheba. When the angel extended his hand to destroy Jerusalem, the Lord relented from his judgment. He told the angel who was killing the people, “That’s enough! Stop now!” (Now the angel of the Lord was near the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite.)

When he saw the angel who was destroying the people, David said to the Lord, “Look, it is I who have sinned and done this evil thing! As for these sheep—what have they done? Attack me and my family.” 2 Samuel 24:10-17

Apparently taking a census isn't always what God desires.
 
Upvote 0

Jay Sea

................ Ke ĉiuj vivu
Mar 28, 2020
340
161
81
victoria
✟26,347.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Reading through the first 9 chapters of I Chronicles, which this is my second time reading it in the last year.. um
I'm getting nothing from it, just a whole lotta names.
I guess there's profit in these geneologies reading once to see how Jesus descended from these people but after that I know He's descended from David and the tribe of Judah, and I don't feel a need for that to be proven to me multiple times, I trust it.

so .. do you reread these geneologies every time you read the bible?
If you are not Jewish or interested in Jewish history/mythology probably nothing.
In LOve
Jay Sea
 
  • Agree
Reactions: pescador
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,475
USA
✟677,608.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Have you forgotten this part of Scripture...

"David felt guilty after he had numbered the army. David said to the Lord, “I have sinned greatly by doing this! Now, O Lord, please remove the guilt of your servant, for I have acted very foolishly.”

When David got up the next morning, the Lord’s message had already come to the prophet Gad, David’s seer: “Go, tell David, ‘This is what the Lord has said: I am offering you three forms of judgment. Pick one of them and I will carry it out against you.’”

Gad went to David and told him, “Shall seven years of famine come upon your land? Or shall you flee for three months from your enemies with them in hot pursuit? Or shall there be three days of plague in your land? Now decide what I should tell the one who sent me.” David said to Gad, “I am very upset! I prefer that we be attacked by the Lord, for his mercy is great; I do not want to be attacked by human hands!”

So the Lord sent a plague through Israel from the morning until the completion of the appointed time, and 70,000 people died from Dan to Beer Sheba. When the angel extended his hand to destroy Jerusalem, the Lord relented from his judgment. He told the angel who was killing the people, “That’s enough! Stop now!” (Now the angel of the Lord was near the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite.)

When he saw the angel who was destroying the people, David said to the Lord, “Look, it is I who have sinned and done this evil thing! As for these sheep—what have they done? Attack me and my family.” 2 Samuel 24:10-17

Apparently taking a census isn't always what God desires.

I wasn't including questions in my posts looking for answers. I was just giving examples of the types of questions one might think about when reading through the genealogies. However, it seems as if the question involving the genealogies led you to the scripture you just quoted and perhaps to a whole new set of questions and other things to reflect and meditate upon, so it would seem that the genealogies aren't perhaps as worthless as you might think. :)
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
13,698
6,129
Massachusetts
✟585,540.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Something else I've found interesting in them is how in general, it is primarily men who are considered important enough to be listed, but every so often a woman is specified, and that also has meaning, particularly within the patriarchal culture in which they lived. We might ask why the writer chose to add in those women, or when it comes to both men and women, why were these particular people emphasized and not some of the others?
Well, from this which you point out, I can get a few possible love lessons.

For one thing, a man being mentioned in scripture does not necessarily mean he is somehow superior, better - - for example . . . Judas. And another thing I just think of now, is how God names a lot of men, but that is all He has to say about them: their names, and they each had at least one son for the genealogy.

But Enoch is distinguished; God is impressed enough with him to say how he walked with the LORD and the LORD received him. Plus, there is Jabez. So, it is possible that so many of those other men never did a thing worth God repeating in scripture. So, that would not at all indicate their somehow being more than women.

Yet, when God gets to Ruth . . . we get how many chapters about her? So, when God is impressed with someone, it matters not if the person is male or female. And position over or under someone else has nothing to do with how a person's character is and if the person is able to love and have God's favor.

And look at how Abigail was proven by God to David > 1 Samuel 25. She stood up to David, put him in his right place, and he praised the LORD for having her do that. And her servants went to her with their concerns; they trusted her, I would say. So, she could have been famous in the most important way . . . not of impressing a lot of Bible scholars, but in how she was personally trusted by servants and how she personally loved and helped them.

Possibly David's esteem for Abigail was somewhat mixed with his admiration for her beauty. If he became able to fall for Bathsheba like he did, I see he might not have appreciated Abigail for totally godly reasons. And she could see through that, perhaps > after all, when he proposed to her, she was talking about how she was going to wash the feet of his servants. So, may be Abigail knew where the real loving would be.

In loving and helping a person deeply, you could be famous in the best possible way . . . with one person, with quality of love, though not quantity of numbers of praising spectators.

I would say that during past decades I have shared with people who loved me genuinely, who were my example of how I needed to become a truly loving person. They are more famous, for me, than a lot of big-name leaders and charmers of history.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: bekkilyn
Upvote 0

Christian Gedge

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
1,214
1,361
Waikato
Visit site
✟227,210.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
okay that didn't answer the question.

I already know there's profit in reading and rereading the new testament, and also the prophetic books and to some degree the law, and in a few cases the historical books have something that can be gleaned from it.. but these lists of geneologies.. I reread them and... nothing.. just spewing out names.

so should I skip them in the future, or just read them anyway?
I don’t think Old Testament genealogy needs to be part of a regular reading plan, but they are there for good reason. Several years ago I did a genealogical study of four of Israel’s tribes - Judah, Levi, Ephraim, and Benjamin. It added greatly to my background understanding of history and chronology. Is there revelation to be had in these? Yes, I believe so. For example good dates enable us to track the messianic timetable up until Jesus.

Have you read ‘The Atonement Clock?’
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bekkilyn
Upvote 0