Hellacious Hermeneutics ... or "Why're we so serious about the Bible"?

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That's exactly what I'm wondering. Everyone but me seems to know best ...

There are many heterodox groups around all claiming that their interpretation of scripture is the only true interpretation and anyone who disagrees with them is of the devil ETC. e.g. LDS, JW, OP, UPCI, WWCG, INC et alia. This list in only representative not inclusive.
And here I've been told by them that "they don't interpret the Bible, they just read it plainly."
Yeah, I'd rather just say, "Wow, I'm not sure what that passage or verse means! I better look into (and maybe pray about it, too, while I'm at it).
Oh yeah. I'm familiar with that. And this is one reason all of the reading of the bible becomes such hard work for all of us. Or well, it's hard work for me anyway... ... which is one reason folks don't see me just laying out scripture quotes left and right. I'd want to be fairly confident that I have a reasonable handle on the most likely intended meaning of a biblical author before I commit to it in written or verbal affirmation.
So, here's a question: What's is the source text on either Biblical Hermeneutics or Biblical Exegesis that you either like these days OR was a favored one back when you were in the university?
First, unless you grew up in a church which used the KJV, I would suggest you get a modern version. I use the KJV and NIV about equally. When I was a young-un the KJV was what I heard in church and the NIV because one of the translators was my professor.
.....I first attended Sunday School when FDR was president. My church attendance was sporadic for about 20+ years. I became a Christian when LBJ was president. And a pastor 17 years later.
.....Then you might consider a Hebrew and Greek lexicon $60-70 range each. Many people rely on the online Strong's. It is a concordance, not a lexicon, which only shows where words occur in the KJV and lists the meaning of words as used in the KJV which may or may not be correct. It has been found to have about 15,000 errors or omissions.
If you are interested you might find more economic lexicons at used book stores near universities or seminaries.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ok. So, you're leaning on the "All I need is the Holy Spirit!" side of the continuum, I take it? There's no need to learn or implement either Hermeneutical studies or apply more educated measures to our reading(s) of the Bible?

Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding your insinuation here. Thanks!

Most people don't have Bibles. And those that do are the worst of all teachers.

Romans 1:19
For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
To me the main point of exegesis is to see what the author meant. That requires study and skill or at least two reasons:
  • Language isn't math. It's a complex enterprise that involves a lot of context. Understanding something written 2000 years ago requires us to realize what words and concepts would have meant in a very different culture.
  • It's very easy to read our own ideas in a text. Exegesis is in large part an attempt to avoid that.
People who don't do careful exegesis typically read the Bible as supporting whatever they currently think.

I think we're on a similar page in this respect, hedrick.

So, in contrast to a few others who have so far contributed, is it safe to say you lean more on the side of doing hermeneutics first and then follow the lead of the Holy Spirit? Or do you conceptualize the mental and spiritual dynamics in all of this in another way? Or how do you desribe it from your point of view?
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
To me the main point of exegesis is to see what the author meant. That requires study and skill or at least two reasons:
  • Language isn't math. It's a complex enterprise that involves a lot of context. Understanding something written 2000 years ago requires us to realize what words and concepts would have meant in a very different culture.
  • It's very easy to read our own ideas in a text. Exegesis is in large part an attempt to avoid that.
People who don't do careful exegesis typically read the Bible as supporting whatever they currently think.
Most people don't have Bibles and no one in the Bible had one either.
So we have to wonder what small group has been chosen to hear the truth?
 
  • Useful
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Most people don't have Bibles. And those that do are the worst of all teachers.

Romans 1:19
For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them

ok. That's an interesting point, Sky. So, do you think Hermeneutics only has something to do with written texts, then?
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ok. That's an interesting point, Sky. So, do you think Hermeneutics only has something to do with written texts, then?

I was looking for Hermeneutics in scripture and didn't find any examples.
So I found no reason to pursue it. I'm sure people have good motivation to do so.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So I was looking for Hermeneutics in scripture and didn't find any examples.
Granted, Hermeutics is a prior and more general category than the specific act of exegesis. But I'd go so far as to say an example of biblical exegesis 'at work' can be found in Ezra 8:6-8, and an example of Hermeneutics can be found in Paul's speech to the Athenians which he gave atop the Areopagus in Acts 17:22-34.

An example of both Hermeneutics and exegesis can be cited by asserting on a general level that "this is what we do" when we literally look through the Bible for the term, Trinity, and don't literally see it there, yet despite this, we somehow realize (...through the study of the contexts and semantics embedded in the texts, and by use of other linguistic and cultural studies of an author's situatedness) that the term, Trinity, can (and should) be applied ... anyway.

On a broader scale, Zimmerman relates that Hermeneutics is what we do "as a defining trait of our humanity and is foundational to every field of human knowledge," [and not just in connection to the Bible] and I think I agree with him. But if you don't, then you don't.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Most people don't have Bibles and no one in the Bible had one either.
So we have to wonder what small group has been chosen to hear the truth?

True, and hermeneutically speaking, I'd say then that the Gospel truth isn't primarily one that originated in written form, but came via word of mouth, right? Hermeneutics isn't only about the written word, but deals with inquiring into all forms of human communication.

So, yeah. The Christian faith involves more than just the Bible alone and always has.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
First, unless you grew up in a church which used the KJV, I would suggest you get a modern version. I use the KJV and NIV about equally. When I was a young-un the KJV was what I heard in church and the NIV because one of the translators was my professor.
.....I first attended Sunday School when FDR was president. My church attendance was sporadic for about 20+ years. I became a Christian when LBJ was president. And a pastor 17 years later.
.....Then you might consider a Hebrew and Greek lexicon $60-70 range each. Many people rely on the online Strong's. It is a concordance, not a lexicon, which only shows where words occur in the KJV and lists the meaning of words as used in the KJV which may or may not be correct. It has been found to have about 15,000 errors or omissions.
If you are interested you might find more economic lexicons at used book stores near universities or seminaries.

Thanks for the points of direction, Der Alte. Fortunately, I'm a bit further along in all of this than just at the beginning.

As for basic resources I used my late mother's NKJV and the Hebrew-Greek Key Study NASB that my wife bought me back in the 1990s. I also have the NIV Thompsen Chain Ref. which my parents bought me back when I graduated from high school. As for a concordance, I use biblegateway.com, but I also have a large, thick NIV conc. in print that comes in handy sometimes as well. And I have a Vine's, of course--a very basic staple to use, and a Greek N.T. Vocabulary, but no big lexicon as yet. Right now, I use biblehub.com for some that.

What I really need to do is buckle down and work through the N.T. Greek language book I have. I keep getting tripped up with doing so. :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
True, and hermeneutically speaking, I'd say then that the Gospel truth isn't primarily one that originated in written form, but came via word of mouth, right? Hermeneutics isn't only about the written word, but deals with inquiring into all forms of human communication.

So, yeah. The Christian faith involves more than just the Bible alone and always has.
There are some authors in the Bible that quote scripture, but not most.
Mostly, the Bible is not about Hermeneutics or includes any examples of it being used.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
An example of both Hermeneutics and exegesis can be cited by asserting on a general level that "this is what we do" when we literally look through the Bible for the term, Trinity, and don't literally see it there, yet despite this, we somehow realize (...through the study of the contexts and semantics embedded in the texts, and by use of other linguistic and cultural studies of an author's situatedness) that the term, Trinity, can (and should) be applied ... anyway.

Could be applied. It's just a teaching tool. Like a Rosary.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There are some authors in the Bible that quote scripture, but not most.
Mostly, the Bible is not about Hermeneutics or includes any examples of it being used.

I beg to differ, but I'm not here to hit people down or make faulty insinuations about them if they decide they disagree with me. So, thanks for sharing your view on this to help me understand the approach other Christians have with handling and understanding the Bible.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

biblelesson

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2021
1,120
407
66
College Park
✟72,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok. So, what are the specific things that the Holy Spirit teaches us to which Paul is referring?

There is a guiding spiritual authority over the bible. The gospel is the manifested life of the Christian. We have been moved from the fleshly carnal man because the fleshly carnal man has been crucified with Christ on the cross, Galatians 2:20. This work was God’s work, 2 Corinthians 5:19. Therefore the communication of true understanding of the gospel is taught by the Spirit, 1 John 2:27; It cannot be taught by fleshly man, or a man that don’t possess the spirit of God, Galatians 1:11-12. The Spirit bears witness with our spirit, not our carnal nature, because we are crucified with Christ, and we now walk by the spirit, Galatians 5:25, which is the same as walking in the new man, Ephesians 4:22-24. If we remain in the flesh reading the bible, and don’t walk by the spirit, and/or if there is no bearing witness with our spirit by the Holy Spirit, we have no way of understanding the bible, thus we remain blinded to the word of God, 2 Corinthians 4:4-6.

Spiritual gifts are given by the Spirit ushered through the gospel, 1 Corinthians 12:1-11. That’s why a teacher of the gospel must be filled with the Sprit to properly communicate what the Spirit is saying to the hearer in order for that hearer to understand the gospel. For this purpose, Jesus gave gifts unto men to be teachers, apostles, pastors, prophets, and evangelists, for the perfecting of the saints, Ephesians 4:8, and Ephesians 4:11-12. I do believe the work of King James in the translation of the bible was Holy Spirit inspired.

Ok. And which aspects of philosophy was Paul warning the Colossian church about? Any and all philosophy of his time? Or just some ideas floating around in the culture at large? How do we know what the referent is to which Paul is pointing?

What Apostle Paul is letting the Colossians know is they have received Christ Jesus and they must walk in Him, Colossians 2:6. Colossians 2:6-12. To walk in Christ in this way is only accomplished by the Spirit. The gospel is alive and is unto salvation, Hebrews 4:12. What Paul means about being spoiled through philosophy and vain deceit and traditions of men is we are to be complete in Christ, but when we introduce philosophy and traditions of men into the gospel, we cannot benefit from its POWER to do what the gospel is meant to do through the Holy Spirit, Romans 1:16. That’s the spoiling he’s talking about.


So, I may be incorrect here, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it almost sounds like your implying that when scholars (and they HAVE to be scholars) who translate the original manuscripts into English for us, they're ALL being led by the Holy Spirit to do so, to transcend the need to interpret within the translation process? Is this what you're implying?

Yes, the work done by these scholars in 1611 by King James were chosen by God to do His work! However, we as believers are responsible for understanding what the word of God says, which requires that we use study material to further our understanding. The bible says we must study to show thyself approved..., 2 Timothy 2:15. However, that's different from the issue of a full and complete new translation of the bible.

Well, the English language was created by man and not God, so what do we do then with the English language (or any modern language that isn't akin to either ancient Hebrew or Koine Greek)? I guess I'm not understanding how the Holy Spirit deposit 'right interpretations' in so many Christian minds when...so many Chrsitian minds end up reading the translations OF the Bible and then disagree with one another about what it is that the Holy Spirit is seemingly teaching in certain portions of the Bible. How are we to discern that our own "plain reading" is Holy Spirit inspired but that of Sally Sue at the other church down the street isn't when she also "plainly reads" the Bible by the power of the Holy Spirit.

It's kind of a modern confusion that I'm trying to sort out ... :cool:

Why?

This is where we must not look at man due to the confusion and look to God and the Holy Spirit. We can't judge whether there is truth to God's word or a spiritual process based on man's confusion. Our closeness with Jesus and the Holy Spirit will help us discern all that's wrong with the scenario you are describing, and lead you in the right way, John 14:26 and 1 Corinthians 2:13.


ok. So, what does Isaiah 28:10 mean in practical terms? You've quoted it as a place by which to be informed, but what is it telling us to do exactly in everyday terms?

The bible mentions the same events in different parts of the bible which fulfills the prophecy, "By the mouth of two witnesses, every word may be established." Matthew 18:16. God has established the truth of the His On word this way, which require that we now search His truth through "precept upon precept, line upon line." When we don't understand a scripture, we can be lead to others scriptures talking about the same thing to help increase our knowledge. That's why we use bible aides, like concordances and bible dictionaries, to help us with the process God Has designed to understand His Own word: "precept upon precept, line upon line. As I said before, this is different from creating whole new translations.


Ok. Well, why are so many Christians disagreeing on the essence and meaning on Eschatology in the Bible? Aren't they all being led by the Spirit?

I will repost what I posted above:
This is where we must not look at man due to the confusion and look to God and the Holy Spirit. We can't judge whether there is truth to God's word or a spiritual process based on man's confusion. Our closeness with Jesus and the Holy Spirit will help us discern all that's wrong with the scenario you are describing, and lead you in the right way, John 14:26 and 1 Corinthians 2:13.

I don't know. I've found that sometimes at least, we have to keep in mind the contexts and the flow of thought positied by an author in order to better understand what that author is attempting to convey. And that's not even just talking about the Bible but with any text or act of human communication.

I agree! But we also must pray for discernment.

Ok. Well, I can't say that I disagree, but aren't you interpreting the meaning of this bit from Romans 1:16 in order to understand what Paul is saying?

We have to understand what we read. if we don't understand something in the bible, we can find the meaning in another place, "precept upon precept, line upon line." For example, Romans 1:16', "It is the power of God unto salvation" can be found in other verses for better understanding, 1 Corinthians 4:20, 1 Thessalonians 1:5, etc. A study bible with references is good for finding other verses that relate which helps with interpreting what the bible is saying allowing the bible to interpret itself.

So, help me out here, because I don't want to misinterpet what your saying, but are you again implying that if the Holy Spirit is involved, we have no need for anyone else in the church to teach us? If that's the case, I guess I don't need to listen to any more sermons from any pastors or evangelists or prophets. :rolleyes: I mean, if I have a Bible, then there's no need for teachers and preachers and all that, right?

I will repost what I posted earlier.
If we remain in the flesh reading the bible, and don’t walk by the spirit, and/or if there is no bearing witness with our spirit by the Holy Spirit, we have no way of understanding the bible, thus we remain blinded to the word of God, 2 Corinthians 4:4-6.

Spiritual gifts are given by the Spirit ushered through the gospel, 1 Corinthians 12:1-11. That’s why a teacher of the gospel must be filled with the Sprit to properly communicate what the Spirit is saying to the hearer in order for that hearer to understand the gospel. For this purpose, Jesus gave gifts unto men to be teachers, apostles, pastors, prophets, and evangelists, for the perfecting of the saints, Ephesians 4:8, and Ephesians 4:11-12.

The gospel is alive and comes alive within the believer, Hebrews 4:12.
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,250
10,567
New Jersey
✟1,148,608.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
I think we're on a similar page in this respect, hedrick.

So, in contrast to a few others who have so far contributed, is it safe to say you lean more on the side of doing hermeneutics first and then follow the lead of the Holy Spirit? Or do you conceptualize the mental and spiritual dynamics in all of this in another way? Or how do you desribe it from your point of view?
That's a hard question to answer. We don't spend half our lives studying the Bible objectively and then reflect on its meaning for us with the aid of the Holy Spirit during the rest of our lives.

But I would say that understanding the meaning it would have had for the original author and audience is *logically* prior to looking at its implication for us. Understanding meaning requires empathy with the author and their community, but my impression from reading commentaries is that a sufficient degree of empathy seems to be present in many non-religious people. Perhaps they are guided by the Holy Spirit anyway, but I'm assuming not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Jesus is YHWH

my Lord and my God !
Site Supporter
Dec 15, 2011
3,496
1,726
✟389,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I just took an intro into Hermeneutics class for college. I've never really had much experience with it...at least not as in depth. It was interesting. It seemed like, though, that they take out the Holy Spirit from it all. We're looking at just what the words say, the original meanings of the Greek and Hebrew, context of where it was written to and all the other contexts that may affect the meaning of what the author themselves had intended when writing it.

I understand why it is a good idea, I just think that there should be a healthy balance. Hermeneutics seems to run the risk (though not intentionally) of nullifying scripture by arguing that it wasn't written to us which goes against 2 Timothy 3:16-17, and one of the basis for the argument of what made scripture, well...scripture.
Yes that is true but having a foundation in good hermeneutics, exegesis or even the inductive bible study method combined with reliance upon the Holy Spirits leading and direction for truth will lead you on the right path of understanding the text.
 
Upvote 0

Jesus is YHWH

my Lord and my God !
Site Supporter
Dec 15, 2011
3,496
1,726
✟389,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I was looking for Hermeneutics in scripture and didn't find any examples.
So I found no reason to pursue it. I'm sure people have good motivation to do so.
The entire book of Hebrews is a "hermenuetic " and " exegesis" of all the OT types and shadows of Christ in the OT.

The same with the book of Romans regarding sin, righteousness, justification etc....

Both of those books systematically take us through the OT laws, principles, types, shadows and gives us a NT application through Christ. The OT pointed us towards Him and His future coming and the NT looks back on those fulfillments in the OT.

So the NT is an exegesis/hermeneutic of the OT.

hope this helps !!!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

spiritfilledjm

Well-known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 15, 2007
1,844
1,642
37
Indianapolis, Indiana
✟225,404.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes that is true but having a foundation in good hermeneutics, exegesis or even the inductive bible study method combined with reliance upon the Holy Spirits leading and direction for truth will lead you on the right path of understanding the text.

Exactly, which is why I don't completely throw out the idea of Hermeneutics. Just like with many things that Christians love to debate, there is a healthy balance. God gave us knowledge about history, language, intent and things like that for a purpose. God also gives us the Holy Spirit as a guide as well for a purpose. Some want to rely only on our own knowledge but not on the knowledge that comes from the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0