Does that mean you read it, though? The whole thing. It’s relevant to the thread. What say you on its findings?
Corroborating evidence is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition. Wikipedia
Pointing out a bunch of people who have likewise assumed that their memories must be accurate is not corroborating evidence.
I have.
And my conclusion has actual evidence,
Yeah, anecdote isn't evidence.
Who says?
Yes. It's nothing but anecdote and assumption.
Summary
- Person died
- They shifted timelines (alive)
- Differences here are Mandela effects
because… reasons.