20 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not so! I totally understand where you are both coming from. I just totally disagree with it. Like many here, I abandoned the Dispy school (and Pretrib/Premil) because it didn't add up and was clearly unbiblical.

Both of your failures to answer the simple biblical arguments presented above reinforce what I am talking about.

If you understand where others are coming from, your tone and the choice of words in your postings will be very different.

For example, you will refrain from insisting that your interpretation is "the truth". and others are in error or "failures".
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you understand where others are coming from, your tone and the choice of words in your postings will be very different.

For example, you will refrain from insisting that your interpretation is "the truth". and others are in error or "failures".

I simply highlighted both of your failures to address the arguments above. You knew that. Now, will you address the evidence above?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I hightled both of your failures to address the arguments above. You knew that. Now, will you address the evidence above?

20 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

All you stated above is your interpretation of scripture, thru the lens of covenant theology.

When people share with you another way of interpreting those scriptures, you ignored all they have said and concluded "they fail to address" your interpretation.

People can explain to you, but they cannot understand it for you.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
20 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

All you stated above is your interpretation of scripture, thru the lens of covenant theology.

When people share with you another way of interpreting those scriptures, you ignored all they have said and concluded "they fail to address" your interpretation.

People can explain to you, but they cannot understand it for you.

I rebutted your claims in great detail but you refused to address the many arguments/Scriptures above that forbid your position. That is your prerogative.

Thanks for the discussion.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
20 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

All you stated above is your interpretation of scripture, thru the lens of covenant theology.

When people share with you another way of interpreting those scriptures, you ignored all they have said and concluded "they fail to address" your interpretation.

People can explain to you, but they cannot understand it for you.

Our God is a Covenant God.

The two major appellatives identifying the Holy Scriptures bear witness to this reality: The Old Testament (i.e. Covenant) and the New Testament (i.e. Covenant).

Since you object to the Covenant understanding of the Holy Scriptures, you presumably also object to their two appellatives.

Therefore, what appellative(s) would you use instead?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Our God is a Covenant God.

The two major appellatives identifying the Holy Scriptures bear witness to this reality: The Old Testament (i.e. Covenant) and the New Testament (i.e. Covenant).

Since you object to the Covenant understanding of the Holy Scriptures, you presumably also object to their two appellatives.

Therefore, what appellative(s) would you use instead?

Totally agree!
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Our God is a Covenant God.

The two major appellatives identifying the Holy Scriptures bear witness to this reality: The Old Testament (i.e. Covenant) and the New Testament (i.e. Covenant).

Since you object to the Covenant understanding of the Holy Scriptures, you presumably also object to their two appellatives.

Therefore, what appellative(s) would you use instead?

Both of you interpret scripture according to the Covenant of Grace of covenant theology, the doctrine that it was always by grace thru faith in Christ's finished work at the cross alone throughout, even before the cross actually happen.

That is one way of interpreting scripture, but not the only way. For one thing, after Exodus, there is no verse that said God made a covenant with Gentiles. The covenants are always made with the nation Israel.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Both of you interpret scripture according to the Covenant of Grace of covenant theology, the doctrine that it was always by grace thru faith in Christ's finished work at the cross alone throughout, even before the cross actually happen.

That is one way of interpreting scripture, but not the only way.

You didn't answer the question.

So you must think that, instead of Old Testament and New Testament, the Holy Scriptures should be identified as:

Guojing's unTestament

Wouldn't that be accurate?
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That is one way of interpreting scripture, but not the only way. For one thing, after Exodus, there is no verse that said God made a covenant with Gentiles. The covenants are always made with the nation Israel.

Why do you persist in espousing these fallacies?

From the beginning, Israel was comprised of both Jews and Gentiles. (Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48; Exodus 12:49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22; et al)

God's Covenants have ever and always only been with those individuals faithful and obedient to Him and His Son.

From beginning to end.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: keras
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why do you persist in espousing these fallacies?

From the beginning, Israel was comprised of both Jews and Gentiles. (Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48; Exodus 12:49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22; et al)

God's Covenants have ever and always only been with those individuals faithful and obedient to Him and His Son.

From beginning to end.

That is another defining doctrine of covenant theology

That is your starting axiom and you consider it as unquestionable. Nothing anyone says will change your mind. That guides how you understand Matthew 10:5-8 and Matthew 15:24 as well.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That is another defining doctrine of covenant theology

That is your starting axiom and you consider it as unquestionable. Nothing anyone says will change your mind.

Of course.

Because the God I serve is a Covenant God.

Who covenants with those faithful and obedient to Him and His Son.

Whom does your God covenant with?
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Of course.

Because the God I serve is a Covenant God.

Who covenants with those faithful and obedient to Him and His Son.

Whom does your God covenant with?

Simple answer: The nation of Israel, which I do not belong to.

I am in the Body of Christ, thru the fall of Israel (Romans 11:11)
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Simple answer: The nation of Israel, which I do not belong to.

I am in the Body of Christ, thru the fall of Israel (Romans 11:11)

Provide Scripture which declares that God covenants with the unfaithful and disobedient.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you consider such people God's chosen people or of their father the devil?

The nation of Israel will ultimately be saved at the end of the Tribulation, because God's promises to their ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were unconditional (Romans 11:25-32)
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The nation of Israel will ultimately be saved at the end of the Tribulation, because God's promises to their ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were unconditional (Romans 11:25-32)

Once again you avoided the question, and once again you do not back up your opinions with Scripture. That is telling!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,839
1,311
sg
✟217,036.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Once again you avoided the question, and once again you do not back up your opinions with Scripture. That is telling!

I already gave Romans 11:25-32 to you.

I cannot make you read it if you refuse to.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.