tdidymas
Newbie
- Aug 28, 2014
- 2,323
- 998
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I disagree with your assessment of what Jesus and John was teaching. Just because the command to repent and believe are told to people, doesn't automatically mean that spiritual rebirth comes after that. I think you are assuming something that scripture isn't saying.The entire narrative of the Bible is that repentance, or a return to God brought about spiritual
revival. The other half of that truth is that usually within one generation they fell back away, clearly
indicating that they lacked the ability to sustain the renewed spiritual state of being right with God.
If a spiritual rebirth requires more than repentance, then why is that all that John the baptist, Jesus
and his apostles preached? Repentance and remission of sin resulted in spiritual rebirth. Receiving
and abiding in the Holy Spirit sustains this activity from a heavenly source: "the wisdom from above"
for example. Jesus distinguished flesh from spirit and the need to discern spirit. He also distinguished
between earthly and heavenly. I am not confusing the two. The subject is spiritual, and yet:
John 3:12 If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? (Not speaking of flesh vs. spirit, but perspective of above or below)
Nicodemus had knowledge of spiritual things from an earthly perspective. This is not the same as saying "that which is born of flesh is flesh". John the baptist is making the same point later in the
same chapter.
27 John answered and said, A man can receive nothing unless it has been given to him from heaven.
31 He who comes from above is above all; he who is of the earth is earthly and speaks of the earth.
He who comes from heaven is above all.
32 And what He has seen and heard, that He testifies; and no one receives His testimony.
33 He who has received His testimony has certified that God is true.
We can assume that if someone is following Jesus, that they are born again, because they are bearing the fruit of repentance and faith. 1 John 5:1 "Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God." So in this vein, it speaks of being born again before the result of repentance is shown.
It is saying that if a person believes, they "are born" of God, which means it's already done, a past event. And a person has to believe first before repenting, otherwise their repentance is nothing but a religious exercise. So the crux of Christianity is on faith in Christ, not on repentance, because repentance is a fruit, or result, of one believing in Christ. And this is the context of redeemed individuals.
Finally, you talk about the "they" of the Israelite nation, as if it's the same thing as what individuals do, but that is an unfair comparison, like comparing apples to oranges. God's dealing with the Israelites under the old covenant has similarities to His dealing with individuals under the new covenant, but it's not the same. The similarity is that even under the old covenant, people were redeemed by faith in the Messiah who was to come, and those people were the remnant of individual believers, some of whom are listed in Heb. 11.
I don't know where you are getting your ideas, but quoting a few verses doesn't cut the mustard. Your argument is not convincing, because the Christian faith is not that complicated. I think that Titus 3:5 is very clear, and I think the vast majority of theologians have it right.
Upvote
0