"again crucify to themselves the Son of God" ?

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,500
7,861
...
✟1,192,679.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This is beginning to sound like an inquisition.

I actually believe in New Testament Non-Resistance (See this CF thread here), and I believe in praying for, and loving my enemies, so you have nothing to fear from me or an inquisition, my friend. But the Word of God says what it means in many cases, and I will defend what His Word says.

You said:
I'll tell you this much: the truth doesn't change.

The word used in the gospel in that particular conversation is the same Paul used when paraphrasing the law on covetousness, epithymeō. Jesus was commenting on the law, in that conversation -- the same law that He says hinges on two commands.

IF YOU THINK that He intended to introduce a standard we can use to justify the castration of little boys, I will tell you, you are in for a rude surprise. What you should do, rather, is meditate on the law and examine your heart rather than your loins, and especially not your neighbor's.

We are not under the 613 Laws of Moses (as a whole or contract), but that does not mean that the teachings of Jesus Christ (pre-cross) do not apply to our lives under the New Covenant (if that is what you are suggesting).

When looking at the Old Law one can categorize the Old Testament Mosaic Law (the 613 Laws of Moses) into a threefold division:
  1. Moral Laws (Any Law pertaining to doing good as a part of nature).
  2. Ceremonial Laws (Laws pertaining to ceremonies or rituals).
  3. Civil Laws (Laws dealing with civil matters; Which includes Laws on carrying out justice).
Even before the written Law of Moses: We can see that there were Moral Laws (like: “Do not murder,” “Do not steal,” Do not covet,” “Do not commit adultery,” etc.), and Ceremonial Laws (like: animal sacrifices).

God's moral laws came into existence for man and would forever exist for him after the Fall of Adam and Eve (after they received the knowledge of good and evil). A Moral Law is any law telling you to do good without a specific law telling you that such a thing is so (See Romans 2:14). These moral laws existed before the Law of Moses.

In the New Covenant (or New Testament) these Moral Laws (like: “Do not murder,” “Do not steal,” Do not covet,” “Do not commit adultery,” etc.) are repeated from the 613 laws within the Law of Moses and they still are in effect (i.e. They have been carried over into the New Testament). However, the Old Testament Law of Moses as a whole or package deal is no more (contractually speaking). Ceremonial Laws or commands: Things like the commands on circumcision, animal sacrifices, the Saturday Sabbath, dietary etc. are no longer binding under the New Covenant. This is because the written Law given to Israel is no longer in effect (as a whole). How so?

Here are a list of verses showing us the Old Law is no more:

"When God speaks of a "new" covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete. It is now out of date and will soon disappear." (Hebrews 8:13) (NLT).

”Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.” (Romans 7:4).

"But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter." (Romans 7:6).

"Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;" (Colossians 2:14).

20 "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not;
22 Which all are to perish with the using; ) after the commandments and doctrines of men?
23 Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body: not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh."
(Colossians 2:20-23).

“By abolishing in His [own crucified] flesh the enmity [caused by] the Law with its decrees and ordinances [which He annulled]; that He from the two might create in Himself one new man [one new quality of humanity out of the two], so making peace.” (Ephesians 2:15) (AMPC).

"The old [former] rule [commandment; regulation] is now set aside [nullified; abolished], because it was weak and useless [ineffective]." (Hebrews 7:18) (EXB).

9 “Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;
10 Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.” (Hebrews 9:9-10).

16 “For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.” (Hebrews 9:16-17).

”And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament…” (Hebrews 9:15).

27 “And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” (Matthew 26:27-28).

50 “Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; “ (Matthew 27:20-51).

8 “Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law;
9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.” (Hebrews 10:8-9).

“And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.” (Acts of the Apostles 15:1).

“But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.” (Acts of the Apostles 15:5).

“Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment” (Acts of the Apostles 15:24).

28 "For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well." (Acts of the Apostles 15:28-29).

7 "But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:
8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?
9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.
10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth.
11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious." (2 Corinthians 3:7-11).

“But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.” (2 Corinthians 3:14).​

The Old Covenant says this about circumcision:

"And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant." (Genesis 17:14).​

Yet, the New Covenant says this about circumcision:

"Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." (Galatians 5:2).​

The Old Covenant says this about the Sabbath:

32 "And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation.
34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him.
35 And the Lord said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
36 And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the Lord commanded Moses." (Numbers 15:32-36).​

Yet, the New Covenant says this about the Sabbath:

"Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:" (Colossians 2:16).​

So it appears things have changed.

This makes sense because Hebrews 7:12 says the Law has changed.

"For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law." (Hebrews 7:12).

“For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” (John 1:17).​

In conclusion:

You sort of have to look at the Old Covenant (Old Testament) as one contract, and the New Covenant (New Testament) as another contract. It's kind of like a contract when you buy a house. If you did not like certain things in the contract, you could ask them to make some changes in the contract. If they agreed to the changes, you would then go by the new contract, and the old contract for the house would be discarded. There may be some similar things between the old contract, and the new contract, but you stick with the new contract in your dealing with buying the house. Meaning: This is why we seek to follow the New Covenant (New Testament) primarily even though there are certain laws that have carried over from the Old Covenant (Old Testament). We are clearly not under the 613 Laws of Moses as a whole or package deal. We follow the commands that come from Jesus and His followers.

You said:
That's awfully wordy. Had you been caught up to pardes I suspect you'd be able to make sense of the text.

Pardes (Jewish exegesis) - Wikipedia

So basically we cannot trust our Bible in what it says plainly in the English, and we have to go to the Jews to understand it?

Sorry, God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.
God has not failed to preserve His own Word perfectly for this generation today.

You said:
In my experience, I cannot stop from noticing the innate, irrational desire of others to continue to crucify -- I'm not afforded that option.

What do you even mean by this statement? Is it based on the Bible in any way?
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
13,901
3,531
✟323,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,207
2,615
✟884,137.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The whole justification of why they can't come to repentance is based on their rejecting the only remedy there is for their sin--Jesus Christ.

Jesus said his sheep; i.e., those who have been saved, shall never perish, but have eternal life
(John 10:27-29).
There is no loss of salvation for those who have been saved.

Everyone rejects the only remedy until they come to repentance. Hebrews 6 seems to indicate something else here.
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,207
2,615
✟884,137.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What I think this means is that because they have already received the Holy Spirit they have also received His guidance and I think it means that nothing we can present as evidence or encouragement can bring such a person back to repentance because nothing we can present can be as compelling or moving as what the Holy Spirit has presented to them. I don’t think this means that they can never repent, I just think this means that there’s nothing we can bring to the table to convince such a person to repent.

I hope you are right about this. The idea of not be able to return to Christ freaks me out. But it protects me from rejecting Christ, since I'm dead scared of doing that.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
25,096
6,100
North Carolina
✟276,593.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Everyone rejects the only remedy until they come to repentance. Hebrews 6 seems to indicate something else here.
Rejecting the only remedy, Christ, is the natural disposition of fallen man.
It requires the work of the Holy Spirit to bring him to faith through the new birth.

Hebrews 6 is about apostasy--having already professed faith, not about the first profession of faith.
Apostasy is turning away from, rejecting that influence of the Holy Spirit.
If you reject his influence once, you will reject the same influence again, and there is no other work to turn you.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
13,901
3,531
✟323,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Appreciation doesn't need/require participation. . .
Not much need for it tho otherwise. Why would God, if pulling all the strings, need or want appreciation from those whose strings lead to heaven, while the other strings lead to hell? He's totally respsonbile for the whole show in that case! Even the apprecation would be caused.

Fortunately God's a rational being instead, using that gained appreciation for a purpose in us, just as the prodigal had to come to an appreciation for his father's home in order to run back to it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
25,096
6,100
North Carolina
✟276,593.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I hope you are right about this.
I think he is dead on.
The idea of not be able to return to Christ freaks me out. But it protects me from rejecting Christ, since I'm dead scared of doing that.
If you love and obey him, you can trust his Holy Spirit to keep you.
The Holy Spirit is the guaranteee of our inheritance (2 Corinthians 1:22, 5:5; Ephesians 1:14; Hebrews 7:22)

Be sure there is no dwelling sin in your life.
Check your obedience.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
25,096
6,100
North Carolina
✟276,593.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not much need for it tho otherwise. Why would God, if pulling all the strings, need or want appreciation from those whos strings lead to heaven, while the other strings lead to hell? He's totally respsonbile for the whole show in that case!
Even the apprecation would be caused.
I consider that a blessing to my otherwise fallen unappreciating heart.
Foretununately God's a rational being instead, using that gained appreciation for a purpose in us, just as the prodigal had to come to an appreciation for his father's home in order to run back to it.
Or using that worked appreciation to bring him back.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,207
2,615
✟884,137.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I think it is more than just a Messianic Jew (Christian) going back to the Jewish religion in persecuting Christians again. I think just the mere act alone of denying Jesus Christ as one's Savior is unforgivable (and it does not necessarily require that Jew persecuting Christians again to be condemned). For if we deny Him, He will deny us. They cannot repent if they go back to a life that outright denies Jesus Christ as their Savior (if they truly once had the Spirit in power). Yes, I understand Peter denied the Lord three times, but this was before he received the Holy Spirit.

Backsliding into a life of sin in general is different, and that is forgivable if we seek repentance (seek forgiveness) with the Lord Jesus Christ.

Peter did deny Jesus by what he said. But I don't think Peter denied Jesus by heart. His intention was never to leave Christ, he acted on fear.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
25,096
6,100
North Carolina
✟276,593.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Peter did deny Jesus by what he said. But I don't think Peter denied Jesus by heart. His intention was never to leave Christ, he acted on fear.
Precisely. . .there was no apostasy in his heart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
13,901
3,531
✟323,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I consider that a blessing to my otherwise fallen unappreciating heart.
I guess He enjoys cursing those He didnt regenerate in that case, whom He also caused to be unregenerate in the first place. Oh well, can't question God. What do we know? He didn't give us any sense of justice or reason, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
25,096
6,100
North Carolina
✟276,593.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I guess He enjoys cursing those He didnt regenerate in that case,
whom He also caused to be unregenerate in the first place. Oh well, can't question God. What do we know? He didn't give us any sense of justice or reason, etc.
You are making God guilty of injustice and sin.
The Bible considers that blashemy, you know.

Jesus was tempted by Satan just as they were tempted by Satan in the garden, and as we all are tempted.

It's life on earth, get used to it.
 
Upvote 0

TheWhat?

Ate all the treats
Jul 3, 2021
1,297
532
SoCal
✟38,935.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
I actually believe in New Testament Non-Resistance (See this CF thread here), and I believe in praying for, and loving my enemies, so you have nothing to fear from me or an inquisition, my friend. But the Word of God says what it means in many cases, and I will defend what His Word says.



We are not under the 613 Laws of Moses (as a whole or contract), but that does not mean that the teachings of Jesus Christ (pre-cross) do not apply to our lives under the New Covenant (if that is what you are suggesting).

When looking at the Old Law one can categorize the Old Testament Mosaic Law (the 613 Laws of Moses) into a threefold division:
  1. Moral Laws (Any Law pertaining to doing good as a part of nature).
  2. Ceremonial Laws (Laws pertaining to ceremonies or rituals).
  3. Civil Laws (Laws dealing with civil matters; Which includes Laws on carrying out justice).
Even before the written Law of Moses: We can see that there were Moral Laws (like: “Do not murder,” “Do not steal,” Do not covet,” “Do not commit adultery,” etc.), and Ceremonial Laws (like: animal sacrifices).

God's moral laws came into existence for man and would forever exist for him after the Fall of Adam and Eve (after they received the knowledge of good and evil). A Moral Law is any law telling you to do good without a specific law telling you that such a thing is so (See Romans 2:14). These moral laws existed before the Law of Moses.

In the New Covenant (or New Testament) these Moral Laws (like: “Do not murder,” “Do not steal,” Do not covet,” “Do not commit adultery,” etc.) are repeated from the 613 laws within the Law of Moses and they still are in effect (i.e. They have been carried over into the New Testament). However, the Old Testament Law of Moses as a whole or package deal is no more (contractually speaking). Ceremonial Laws or commands: Things like the commands on circumcision, animal sacrifices, the Saturday Sabbath, dietary etc. are no longer binding under the New Covenant. This is because the written Law given to Israel is no longer in effect (as a whole). How so?

Here are a list of verses showing us the Old Law is no more:

"When God speaks of a "new" covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete. It is now out of date and will soon disappear." (Hebrews 8:13) (NLT).

”Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.” (Romans 7:4).

"But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter." (Romans 7:6).

"Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;" (Colossians 2:14).

20 "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not;
22 Which all are to perish with the using; ) after the commandments and doctrines of men?
23 Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body: not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh."
(Colossians 2:20-23).

“By abolishing in His [own crucified] flesh the enmity [caused by] the Law with its decrees and ordinances [which He annulled]; that He from the two might create in Himself one new man [one new quality of humanity out of the two], so making peace.” (Ephesians 2:15) (AMPC).

"The old [former] rule [commandment; regulation] is now set aside [nullified; abolished], because it was weak and useless [ineffective]." (Hebrews 7:18) (EXB).

9 “Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;
10 Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.” (Hebrews 9:9-10).

16 “For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.” (Hebrews 9:16-17).

”And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament…” (Hebrews 9:15).

27 “And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” (Matthew 26:27-28).

50 “Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.
51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; “ (Matthew 27:20-51).

8 “Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law;
9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.” (Hebrews 10:8-9).

“And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.” (Acts of the Apostles 15:1).

“But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.” (Acts of the Apostles 15:5).

“Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment” (Acts of the Apostles 15:24).

28 "For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well." (Acts of the Apostles 15:28-29).

7 "But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:
8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?
9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.
10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth.
11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious." (2 Corinthians 3:7-11).

“But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.” (2 Corinthians 3:14).​

The Old Covenant says this about circumcision:

"And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant." (Genesis 17:14).​

Yet, the New Covenant says this about circumcision:

"Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." (Galatians 5:2).​

The Old Covenant says this about the Sabbath:

32 "And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation.
34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him.
35 And the Lord said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
36 And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the Lord commanded Moses." (Numbers 15:32-36).​

Yet, the New Covenant says this about the Sabbath:

"Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:" (Colossians 2:16).​

So it appears things have changed.

This makes sense because Hebrews 7:12 says the Law has changed.

"For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law." (Hebrews 7:12).

“For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” (John 1:17).​

In conclusion:

You sort of have to look at the Old Covenant (Old Testament) as one contract, and the New Covenant (New Testament) as another contract. It's kind of like a contract when you buy a house. If you did not like certain things in the contract, you could ask them to make some changes in the contract. If they agreed to the changes, you would then go by the new contract, and the old contract for the house would be discarded. There may be some similar things between the old contract, and the new contract, but you stick with the new contract in your dealing with buying the house. Meaning: This is why we seek to follow the New Covenant (New Testament) primarily even though there are certain laws that have carried over from the Old Covenant (Old Testament). We are clearly not under the 613 Laws of Moses as a whole or package deal. We follow the commands that come from Jesus and His followers.

[Mat 13:19, 23 NKJV] 23 "But he who received [the word of the kingdom] on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands [it], who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty."

[2Ti 3:14-15 NKJV] 14 But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned [them], 15 and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

[Jas 1:21 NKJV] 21 Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.

[Heb 8:10 NKJV] 10 "For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.

Pardes (Jewish exegesis) - Wikipedia

So basically we cannot trust our Bible in what it says plainly in the English, and we have to go to the Jews to understand it?

Sorry, God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.
God has not failed to preserve His own Word perfectly for this generation today.

[Eph 3:9 NKJV] 9 ... the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the ages has been hidden in God who created all things through Jesus Christ...

[Rev 1:8 NKJV] 8 "I am the Alpha and the Omega, [the] Beginning and [the] End," says the Lord, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."

[Psa 119:11 NKJV] 11 Your word I have hidden in my heart, That I might not sin against You.

[Jhn 4:22-23 NKJV] 22 ... salvation is of the Jews. 23 "But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,500
7,861
...
✟1,192,679.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Mat 13:19, 23 NKJV 23 "But he who received [the word of the kingdom] on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands [it], who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty."

So you believe that some believers can fall away? That is what this parable is in part teaching.
We need to endure and not be offended by the Word or allow riches or the cares of this life to choke the Word.

You said:
2Ti 3:14-15 NKJV 14 But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned [them], 15 and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

Faith in Christ Jesus is more than just believing in Jesus as one’s Savior, but it is in following Jesus, too (By obeying His commandments). For Paul says he fought the good fight of faith.

“I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith:” (2 Timothy 4:7).

So faith is not a belief alone.

You have to fight.

For 1 Timothy 6:12 says, “Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life,”

So there is an eternal life by fighting the good fight of faith.

You said:
Jas 1:21 NKJV 21 Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.

Right, this is in context to James 1:12 in resisting temptation so as to receive the crown of life.

“Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.” (James 1:12).

We have to receive the Word in being saved by God’s grace, but we also have to receive the words of God on Sanctification, too. For without holiness, no man shall see the Lord (Hebrews 12:14).

You said:
Heb 8:10 NKJV 10 "For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.

While we are in the New Covenant currently, this New Covenant has not happened yet for the nation of Israel. That will more fully be realized or happen for them in the Millennium. See: Hebrews 8:11. For the Israelite will not have to say, “Know the Lord” anymore to anyone. That can only happen in the Millennium and not in this current time period because there will always be unbelievers before Christ’s 2nd Coming. Anyways, the New Covenant for the believer today is everything in your New Testament.

The New Covenant began with Christ’s death.

“For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.” (Hebrews 9:17).

“Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.” (Hebrews 10:9).

You said:
Eph 3:9 NKJV 9 ... the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the ages has been hidden in God who created all things through Jesus Christ...

This needs to be read in context to the next chapter that says:

“This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind, Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart: Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness. But ye have not so learned Christ; If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus” (Ephesians 4:17-21).

You said:
Rev 1:8 NKJV 8 "I am the Alpha and the Omega, [the] Beginning and [the] End," says the Lord, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."

Jesus is our Omega or End. We all must face Jesus come judgment day. John 12:48 says, “He… receiveth not my words,… the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.”

What words of Jesus can condemn us on the last day if we do not receive them?

Oh, things like Matthew 5:28-30, Matthew 6:15, Matthew 12:37, Matthew 25:31-46, Matthew 16:25, Luke 9:62, etc.

“And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” (John 5:29).

“And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;” (Hebrews 5:9).

In fact, the last chapter of Revelation says this:

“Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.” (Revelation 22:14-15).

You said:
Psa 119:11 NKJV 11 Your word I have hidden in my heart, That I might not sin against You.

Before you appear to say that man is fallen and sinful (implying that believers cannot overcome grievous sin in this life). Did I assume wrong? If so, then why did you not explain or endorse Matthew 5:28-30? Where do we see Matthew 5:28-30 as an exclusive teaching of the Old Covenant whereby it has been abrogated in the New Covenant? Adultery is still condemned by the apostle Paul. Paul says that adulterers shall not inherit the kingdom of God (See: 1 Corinthians 6:9-10).

You said:
Jhn 4:22-23 NKJV 22 ... salvation is of the Jews. 23 "But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him.

Well, that’s because Jesus is a Jew. But that does not mean the Jews as a nation accepted their own Jewish Messiah. They were blind to seeing Jesus as their Messiah. So why should we look to the Jews to understand Scripture if that is the case? Granted, one day, the Jewish nation will repent and recognize their Messiah, but they currently don’t.

“For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.” (Romans 11:25).

So we should trust what the Bible says plainly. We should not seek to change what the Word says to fit our own personal beliefs in what we want to be true.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,500
7,861
...
✟1,192,679.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Even if they have blasphemed the Holy Spirit?

I believe the condemnation of “the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit” (i.e. Speaking bad words against the Holy Spirit) only applies to Spirit filled believers, and not unbelievers. If an unbeliever commits this sin, they are in danger of hellfire, but they are not actually condemned by this sin. While Paul may have not committed this sin, Paul said, “Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.” (1 Timothy 1:13) (Note: Why is Paul concerned about being forgiven of these sins?).

Anyways, here are my 4 major points why only a regenerated Spirit filled believer can commit this particular unforgivable sin.

Point #1. Matthew 12:32 - “Neither the world to come.”

“And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.” (Matthew 12:32).​

The word “whosoever” in Matthew 12:32 can be used for a specific people group like believers only and not just all people. We see a clear example of this in 1 John 3:15. For 1 John 3:15 says,

“Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.” (1 John 3:15).​

Can unbelievers hate their spiritual Christian brother? No. Only believers have spiritual brothers in Christ. Unbelievers are not partakers of the body of Christ (whereby they could have true spiritual Christian brothers); They are unbelievers outside the body.

In Matthew 12:32: The “whosoever” is in context to the believer who has tasted of God’s Spirit because it says that this sin can be committed in the “world to come.” The “world to come” is the Millennium or the future 1,000 year reign of Jesus Christ. Everyone will all start out be a Spirit filled believer in the Millennium because Christ will be living and reigning in this time period. So only the Spirit filled Christian who seeks to turn away from God and who speaks bad words against the Spirit will never be forgiven.

Point #2. Matthew 12:33 - “Make the tree good, and his fruit good.”

Jesus says to the Pharisees:

“Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.” (Matthew 12:33).​

If these Pharisees were forever condemned by their committing the unforgivable sin here, then why is Jesus telling them to make the tree good and his fruit good? This means that there is still hope for these Pharisees because they said what they did in ignorance like Paul’s actions were done in ignorance before encountering Jesus and His grace.

Point #3. Mark 3:29 - “In Danger of Eternal Damnation.”

Jesus says,

“But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:” (Mark 3:29).​

“Danger” is the keyword here to focus on here. If you are in danger, you have a chance to change your course, and be safe and out of danger. If you get a warning of danger by seeing a shark fin in the water, you would swim as fast as you can to safety. If you were in a burning building, you would be in danger of being burned up, unless you got out and or you called the fire department to rescue you. Danger means you are seriously close to a bad thing happening but it does not mean that bad has already happened to you. When we experience “danger” we are receiving a warning or sign that we are very close to disaster, harm, or destruction.

Point #4. Luke 12:8-12 are words spoken to the believer.

“Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God: But he that denieth me before men shall be denied before the angels of God. And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven. And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say: For the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what ye ought to say.” (Luke 12:8-12).
In Luke 12:8-12: It starts out talking to the believer and it ends with talking to the Spirit filled believer (for the passage ends saying that the Holy Ghost shall teach you what you ought to say); Yet, in the middle of this conversation, it refers to how blasphemy against the Spirit can never be forgiven. This implies that only the Christian who tasted of the Spirit can only speak bad words towards the Spirit and it is not referring to the unbeliever here. For obviously if we denied God as an atheist before coming to the faith, that does not mean we cannot accept Jesus later on, and be forgiven. So the blasphemy of the Spirit is only possible for a Christian who had tasted of the Spirit (Especiallly when we look at the whole counsel of God’s Word).
 
Upvote 0

TheWhat?

Ate all the treats
Jul 3, 2021
1,297
532
SoCal
✟38,935.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
So you believe that some believers can fall away? That is what this parable is in part teaching.
We need to endure and not be offended by the Word or allow riches or the cares of this life to choke the Word.



Faith in Christ Jesus is more than just believing in Jesus as one’s Savior, but it is in following Jesus, too (By obeying His commandments). For Paul says he fought the good fight of faith.

“I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith:” (2 Timothy 4:7).

So faith is not a belief alone.

You have to fight.

For 1 Timothy 6:12 says, “Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life,”

So there is an eternal life by fighting the good fight of faith.



Right, this is in context to James 1:12 in resisting temptation so as to receive the crown of life.

“Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.” (James 1:12).

We have to receive the Word in being saved by God’s grace, but we also have to receive the words of God on Sanctification, too. For without holiness, no man shall see the Lord (Hebrews 12:14).



While we are in the New Covenant currently, this New Covenant has not happened yet for the nation of Israel. That will more fully be realized or happen for them in the Millennium. See: Hebrews 8:11. For the Israelite will not have to say, “Know the Lord” anymore to anyone. That can only happen in the Millennium and not in this current time period because there will always be unbelievers before Christ’s 2nd Coming. Anyways, the New Covenant for the believer today is everything in your New Testament.

The New Covenant began with Christ’s death.

The new covenant is exactly that -- a covenant. It doesn't mean that God created a new or different truth, which the scripture I referenced witnesses to: the mystery is from the beginning, and will persist to the end.

“For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.” (Hebrews 9:17).

“Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.” (Hebrews 10:9).



This needs to be read in context to the next chapter that says:

“This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind, Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart: Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness. But ye have not so learned Christ; If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus” (Ephesians 4:17-21).



Jesus is our Omega or End. We all must face Jesus come judgment day. John 12:48 says, “He… receiveth not my words,… the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.”

“And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” (John 5:29).

“And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;” (Hebrews 5:9).



Before you appear to say that man is fallen and sinful (implying that believers cannot overcome grievous sin in this life). Did I assume wrong? If so, then why did you not explain or endorse Matthew 5:28-30? Where do we see Matthew 5:28-30 as an exclusive teaching of the Old Covenant whereby it has been abrogated in the New Covenant? Adultery is still condemned by the apostle Paul. Paul says that adulterers shall not inherit the kingdom of God (See: 1 Corinthians 6:9-10).



Well, that’s because Jesus is a Jew. But that does not mean the Jews as a nation accepted their own Jewish Messiah. They were blind to seeing Jesus as their Messiah. So why should we look to the Jews to understand Scripture if that is the case? Granted, one day, the Jewish nation will repent and recognize their Messiah, but they currently don’t. So we should trust what the Bible says plainly. We should not seek to change what the Word says to fit our own personal beliefs in what we want to be true.

You're still hung up on grace vs law. I've attempted to make my points as clear and understandable as is possible. Every religion I know of, every nation, and almost everyone has a morality -- even murderers tend to justify their actions. There's nothing special, really, about considering yourself to be a moral person. But if the truth is eternal and unchanging, diverging moralities show that none of us is really moral, if we have diverged from an eternal and unchanging truth -- which is the truth of a fallen world.

Let me put it this way: if you meet your maker, and it just so happens that in your own sight He is immoral by your own chosen standards, placing you in shoes similar to those who crucified Christ, how do you think that will end? The problem with modern christianity is that in its audacity it thinks it can replace the truth because it has authority. Well, you can have your pride and position of influence, I'll take salvation, even if that means I must take the lowest seat in the kingdom.
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
13,901
3,531
✟323,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
You are making God guilty of injustice and sin.
The Bible considers that blashemy, you know.

Jesus was tempted by Satan just as they were tempted by Satan in the garden, and as we all are tempted.

It's life on earth, get used to it.
That’s so lame tho. “It’s life on earth get used it.” And ironic, because you make “God guilty of injustice and sin” by making Him the sole cause of our disposition, either for or against Him, guilty or innocent. That’s the only way God can be sovereign from the Calvinist POV. Did God want Adam to sin when He commanded him not to eat of the fruit? Was Gods will done? Or, does God create evil?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,207
2,615
✟884,137.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I believe the condemnation of “the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit” (i.e. Speaking bad words against the Holy Spirit) only applies to Spirit filled believers, and not unbelievers. If an unbeliever commits this sin, they are in danger of hellfire, but they are not actually condemned by this sin. While Paul may have not committed this sin, Paul said, “Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.” (1 Timothy 1:13) (Note: Why is Paul concerned about being forgiven of these sins?).

Anyways, here are my 4 major points why only a regenerated Spirit filled believer can commit this particular unforgivable sin.

Point #1. Matthew 12:32 - “Neither the world to come.”

“And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.” (Matthew 12:32).​

The word “whosoever” in Matthew 12:32 can be used for a specific people group like believers only and not just all people. We see a clear example of this in 1 John 3:15. For 1 John 3:15 says,

“Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.” (1 John 3:15).​

Can unbelievers hate their spiritual Christian brother? No. Only believers have spiritual brothers in Christ. Unbelievers are not partakers of the body of Christ (whereby they could have true spiritual Christian brothers); They are unbelievers outside the body.

In Matthew 12:32: The “whosoever” is in context to the believer who has tasted of God’s Spirit because it says that this sin can be committed in the “world to come.” The “world to come” is the Millennium or the future 1,000 year reign of Jesus Christ. Everyone will all start out be a Spirit filled believer in the Millennium because Christ will be living and reigning in this time period. So only the Spirit filled Christian who seeks to turn away from God and who speaks bad words against the Spirit will never be forgiven.

Point #2. Matthew 12:33 - “Make the tree good, and his fruit good.”

Jesus says to the Pharisees:

“Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.” (Matthew 12:33).​

If these Pharisees were forever condemned by their committing the unforgivable sin here, then why is Jesus telling them to make the tree good and his fruit good? This means that there is still hope for these Pharisees because they said what they did in ignorance like Paul’s actions were done in ignorance before encountering Jesus and His grace.

Point #3. Mark 3:29 - “In Danger of Eternal Damnation.”

Jesus says,

“But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:” (Mark 3:29).​

“Danger” is the keyword here to focus on here. If you are in danger, you have a chance to change your course, and be safe and out of danger. If you get a warning of danger by seeing a shark fin in the water, you would swim as fast as you can to safety. If you were in a burning building, you would be in danger of being burned up, unless you got out and or you called the fire department to rescue you. Danger means you are seriously close to a bad thing happening but it does not mean that bad has already happened to you. When we experience “danger” we are receiving a warning or sign that we are very close to disaster, harm, or destruction.

Point #4. Luke 12:8-12 are words spoken to the believer.

“Also I say unto you, Whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall the Son of man also confess before the angels of God: But he that denieth me before men shall be denied before the angels of God. And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven. And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say: For the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what ye ought to say.” (Luke 12:8-12).
In Luke 12:8-12: It starts out talking to the believer and it ends with talking to the Spirit filled believer (for the passage ends saying that the Holy Ghost shall teach you what you ought to say); Yet, in the middle of this conversation, it refers to how blasphemy against the Spirit can never be forgiven. This implies that only the Christian who tasted of the Spirit can only speak bad words towards the Spirit and it is not referring to the unbeliever here. For obviously if we denied God as an atheist before coming to the faith, that does not mean we cannot accept Jesus later on, and be forgiven. So the blasphemy of the Spirit is only possible for a Christian who had tasted of the Spirit (Especiallly when we look at the whole counsel of God’s Word).

I also believe it's a sin of a believer, reasoning only someone who has been saved can renounce what has been given him. Only a believer knows exactly what it is he is renouncing, that's why I believe it's unforgivable. That's my guess.
 
Upvote 0