Getting back to this, the comparison would work if different choices in food caused one to be much more likely to transmit a a virus to the patients in their care. That not being how things work it falls on it’s face.
Im happy you value the wisdom of the wise so much that you cannot let this go.....But it was freely given to me, so I will freely give it to you.
The patients my family take care of already have covid......so there is no risk of me giving to them....the risks, i guess would be them giving to us. The forcing injections for fear of me transmitting does not apply......as they dont in many other mandated situations.
I suspect that the reason for forcing the vaccine will change depending on the environment and the institution.
we are protecting the patients in hospitals, the children in schools, the elderly in nursing homes, the patrons in stores, the people walking in the parks...etc..
And these new approvals will make way for more mandates.
The point was if requiring a hepatitis vaccination to work in a hospital isn’t a awful abridgment of ones rights why is it such with the Covid vaccine?
I happen to think the analogy does work......you think all vaccines are equal and harmless so if you are ok with one, you should be ok with all... And, likewise all food, deemed safe to eat, is harmless....So why would you allow people to be picky about the foods they put in their body, but not about the medicine they put in their body?
Can I be ok with motrin, but refuse to take aspirin? Can I be ok with a flu shot, but refuse to take a covid shot or tetanus shot?
Your, "ok with one item in a group, ok with all items," is not realistic.