zippy2006
Dragonsworn
It is more accurate to say by translation rather than definition...
I don't really have time to address all of the mistaken assumptions here. The point is that this OP and Adams' paper argue against an eternal Hell, which is what all English speakers understand by the word Hell when used in the Christian theological context. It is precisely (eternal) Hell that the historical heresies are associated with.
This is just elementary stuff. It is sophistry to claim that the traditional heresy of denying Hell would not apply to the OP or to Adams' position. Adams herself would be the first to admit that she is arguing against established Christian tradition.
(This conversation is drawing quickly to a close...)
Upvote
0