To all:
My experience with Eternal Security folk is that they do justify sin on some level when push comes to shove (even when they will talk at another point in promoting holy living). For they don’t believe a Christian is out because of one serious sin that goes unconfessed and or not forsaken. Yet, we know Adam and Eve committed just one sin each and led to spiritual death. We know Ananias and Sapphira each died and were condemned for committing just one sin each.
The problem with Belief Alone-ism or Eternal Security is that even if you say that we must live holy, each group defines that differently when the Bible clearly tells us about the various different serious sins that will condemn us if we do not confess and forsake them. It’s not just not murdering, not coveting, not lying, etc. but it is not loving God and others, too. We have to love the brethren. For he that does not love his brother is not of God according to 1 John 3:10. So if one fails to love their brother in this life (When they had opportunities to do so), they are not going to make it. This shows that Belief Alone-ism and or Eternal Security are simply false according to Scripture. God requires us to be holy and to be fruitful. To what degree? God does not say we need to be over abundantly in order to be saved. Matthew 25:21 simply says that the servant who was faithful over a few things was told to enter into the joy of His Lord. So we must be faithful over a few things in regards to being fruitful for God’s kingdom. It may not be a lot because we are faithful over a few things. So we do not need to be super stars. We just need to love God and love others and that involves doing and not just with our words alone.
Could you define one failing to love their brother?
Upvote
0