- Dec 17, 2010
- 8,302
- 1,735
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
Hi all,
Sydney Anglican Amils are NOT Full Preterist (which is a heresy that the Lord has already returned) but Partial Preterist.
Most of Old Testament scripture is fulfilled in Eschatological Tension of the gospel - the now and not yet nature of the Kingdom of God as we wait for Jesus to return.
Jesus WILL return - we know that from other parts of the New Testament. But I'm still not sure how much of the Olivet Discourse discusses the future Judgement Day - IF ANY of Olivet does! Let me explain.
There seems to be 2 views in the Reformed Evangelical camp. This next piece is not to prove anything, but just outline the views:-
Reformed Amil: TWO questions are answered - one about THAT temple being destroyed in THAT generation within 40 years, and the next question being answered about the END OF THE AGE = Judgement Day.
There are 'these things' (temple being destroyed, sacrificial system, abomination that causes desolation of the temple) which happen at AD70 after Jesus effectively does away with the sacrificial system.
Then 'that day' which is Judgement Day, the end of all things.
2 subjects: temple, the 'these things' that happens in THAT generation.
THEN the future.
This seems to be the view of the Reformed and IVP commentaries on Biblegateway.
Boltian Amil: (By Dr Peter Bolt of Moore Theological College - the Sydney Anglicans):
ONE question is answered - about the end of THAT temple and the whole sacrificial system because of Jesus death and resurrection - and that the apocalyptic language is all about the gospel.
EG: Jesus on the clouds of heaven is Coming TO the Ancient of Days in victory after ascending, and the angels = messengers going out to collect the elect are in fact the Apostles declaring the gospel. Other verses that back this reading of the weird apocalyptic language of the heavens shaken and causing grief and concern on earth are Acts 2 where Peter explains Pentecost in the language of Joel. The gospel is declared in the face of the turmoil of this world - and reminds people that we do not have forever.
At this stage of my investigations it seems the great DA Carson Is Reformed Amil - that the apocalyptic language of sun darkening etc does in fact refer to Jesus return. The second question is answered.
But most of the Sydney Anglicans I know think the Son of Man on the clouds is actually returning to the Ancient of Days in Daniel's prophecy - meaning that particular bit of apocalyptic is fulfilled not in the future but by the gospel itself.
It's a big and quite technical debate - and I just may not be up to it. I'm not a professional theologian myself - and do not have the ancient Hebrew or Greek to evaluate some matters. I have a lot of reading to do.
Sydney Anglican Amils are NOT Full Preterist (which is a heresy that the Lord has already returned) but Partial Preterist.
Most of Old Testament scripture is fulfilled in Eschatological Tension of the gospel - the now and not yet nature of the Kingdom of God as we wait for Jesus to return.
Jesus WILL return - we know that from other parts of the New Testament. But I'm still not sure how much of the Olivet Discourse discusses the future Judgement Day - IF ANY of Olivet does! Let me explain.
There seems to be 2 views in the Reformed Evangelical camp. This next piece is not to prove anything, but just outline the views:-
Reformed Amil: TWO questions are answered - one about THAT temple being destroyed in THAT generation within 40 years, and the next question being answered about the END OF THE AGE = Judgement Day.
There are 'these things' (temple being destroyed, sacrificial system, abomination that causes desolation of the temple) which happen at AD70 after Jesus effectively does away with the sacrificial system.
Then 'that day' which is Judgement Day, the end of all things.
2 subjects: temple, the 'these things' that happens in THAT generation.
THEN the future.
This seems to be the view of the Reformed and IVP commentaries on Biblegateway.
Boltian Amil: (By Dr Peter Bolt of Moore Theological College - the Sydney Anglicans):
ONE question is answered - about the end of THAT temple and the whole sacrificial system because of Jesus death and resurrection - and that the apocalyptic language is all about the gospel.
EG: Jesus on the clouds of heaven is Coming TO the Ancient of Days in victory after ascending, and the angels = messengers going out to collect the elect are in fact the Apostles declaring the gospel. Other verses that back this reading of the weird apocalyptic language of the heavens shaken and causing grief and concern on earth are Acts 2 where Peter explains Pentecost in the language of Joel. The gospel is declared in the face of the turmoil of this world - and reminds people that we do not have forever.
At this stage of my investigations it seems the great DA Carson Is Reformed Amil - that the apocalyptic language of sun darkening etc does in fact refer to Jesus return. The second question is answered.
But most of the Sydney Anglicans I know think the Son of Man on the clouds is actually returning to the Ancient of Days in Daniel's prophecy - meaning that particular bit of apocalyptic is fulfilled not in the future but by the gospel itself.
It's a big and quite technical debate - and I just may not be up to it. I'm not a professional theologian myself - and do not have the ancient Hebrew or Greek to evaluate some matters. I have a lot of reading to do.
Last edited: