JohnEmmett
Well-Known Member
- Jan 21, 2017
- 5,139
- 454
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Buddhist
- Marital Status
- Celibate
The sound of you missing the point.
you know not
Last edited:
Upvote
0
The sound of you missing the point.
Now this is a very interesting view.There is no force, if any force is work on the earth it is magnetism.
If there is a force call gravity, it is mighty selective in what it chooses to pull or push to earth. It seems like heavier objects are this imaginary forces preference for pulling or pushing to earth.
Now this is a very interesting view.
It still seems that this "magnetism" is just as selective, prefering to pull to earth heavier things.
But at the same time, NOT selecting for things with different electromagnetic properties.
Dropping a bar magnet or a equally sized bar of simple iron will result in the same movement.
Weird.
It's almost as if this "magnetism" doesn't behave like the magnetism we see in magnets at all. It almost seems as if it's a phenomenon independent of magnetism. It almost seems that it is not based on the electromagnetic properties of an object, but on its mass.
Perhaps we should give it a different name. Like "heaviness". Or, because science likes its Latin.... "gravity".
I am a gravity atheist
So prove there is a force … called gravity.
May this be the devil's will trying to bring us to the darkness? God's might keeping us above ground and, ultimately, winning the battle of good and evil.
Take several steps back. You first need to demonstrate that the earth is flat and stationary.I am a gravity atheist, you should understand that.
Like the atheist sates prove to me there is a god.
So prove there is a force needed for a flat and stationary earth, that has been called gravity.
Obviously that is not possible since it would require you to accept data that you currently ignore, or deny exists. For example, we could not have placed dozens of interplanetary probes into precise locations throughout the solar system if gravity did not exist and we have a sound understanding of it. But, apparently, you deny such probes actually exist, that they are some sort of conspiracy. So why even ask for proof, when you intend to ignore it. Is it not rather insincere?So prove there is a force needed for a flat and stationary earth, that has been called gravity.
So prove there is a force needed for a flat and stationary earth, that has been called gravity.
Jump up. You fall down. Happens every time.
That was easy.
Would you like us to prove the existence of air next?
Jump up. You fall down. Happens every time.
That was easy.
Right. It still obviously exists.
No one has explained why you keep posting, but it happens.
I've noticed it fairly often.Gravity - is it really there?
I'm sixty years old and I've observed gravity at work during every instant of my life, so "blind assumption" and "magical" seem pretty poor descriptors of my expectation that it'll be there in five minutes when I pour myself some coffee.I have always been suspicious of the, seemingly, blind assumption that there is a magical force forcing us down to the Earth
I've noticed it fairly often.
Flat earth is absurd… atheism is dangerous.
Shrug