You believe a person can be saved never reading the bible?

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
13,901
3,531
✟323,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
After a believer is saved by God's grace: I believe that a genuine believer who abides in Christ will want to seek to obey the commands of Christ because they love Him.
I agree, and that we love Him not only because He first loved us but because of the love He's wrought within us now, for both Himself and neighbor. That love, to love as He does, automatically desires the good of the other-fulfilling the commandments-and that love is intended to grow as well.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
28,093
13,341
72
✟367,100.00
Faith
Non-Denom
God can’t do whatever he desires; that is against his own nature and character. The ability to reach others that are not in society like us Americans are. It is said that God is know through nature. So someone out there who might not even know American language can call out to the all creator God, by simply coming to a conscious decision inside of their heart there is something greater than themselves that created them. That is my view. Thank you for sharing yours @shineyourlight

Paul explicitly demonstrates the purpose of God's revelation in nature in Romans 1. God has revealed Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. The purpose is for judgement, not for salvation. Nobody can be saved by general revelation, according to the New Testament, but must be saved by believing in the name of Jesus Christ.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: GallagherM
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Paul explicitly demonstrates the purpose of God's revelation in nature in Romans 1. God has revealed Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. The purpose is for judgement, not for salvation. Nobody can be saved by general revelation, according to the New Testament, but must be saved by believing in the name of Jesus Christ.
What do you make of this from post #27 ?

In Matthew 25, Jesus is separating the sheep from the goats. He says "Come, you blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." He then lists a bunch of activities that they performed. Not one of which mentions belief or faith, by the way. It's all actions like feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the sick. Those people say back to him..."When?"

In short, they had no idea what they had done was getting them saved. At the very least, they never read or heard that chapter of the Bible.

The Good Samaritan was neither Jew nor Christian, and yet his tale is how Jesus used to finish answering the question, "Master, how do I obtain eternal life." He says we should "go and do likewise." Do we imagine the Good Samaritan went to hell?

And of course, as pointed out already, Paul speaks plainly in Romans about how, those that have never heard the law 'are a law unto themselves', and their conscience either bears witness for or against them on the day of judgment.
@Emet_Ziton
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's not what I mean. He is slow to anger. He is forgiving. He is grace. Jesus saved us from His wrath (Romans 5:9).

I think you took my statement out of context since I'm talking about Him doing what He can do with the salvation of people. That doesn't seem like I was saying He was an angry God, but maybe you interpreted it as that. :)
In this post you say that Jesus saved us from the wrath of God. Is wrath different from anger in some way? Did Jesus die to save us from God?
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,254
20,262
US
✟1,450,958.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Paul explicitly demonstrates the purpose of God's revelation in nature in Romans 1. God has revealed Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. The purpose is for judgement, not for salvation. Nobody can be saved by general revelation, according to the New Testament, but must be saved by believing in the name of Jesus Christ.

So when Paul says:

God intended that they would seek Him and perhaps reach out for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us.

Does that mean God is merely playing "stump the dummy" with those people?
 
Upvote 0

Bruce Leiter

A sinner saved by God's astounding grace and love
Jun 16, 2018
782
551
81
West Michigan
Visit site
✟56,865.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello you and welcome.

Do you believe a person can be saved never reading the bible?

Is there anyway for God to divinely intervene with this person who may have faith in the existence of God never reading the bible?

What are your thoughts on God being powerful enough to even interact with his creation outside the parameters of possibly never hearing, or reading the bible?

Jesus said to his disciples, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6). Everyone will be without excuse for their unbelief on that final day because they haven't discerned that he is their Creator from the evidence of his creation (Romans 1:18-20). The truth is that all of humanity came into this world as slaves of Satan and need to believe in God through faith in Jesus to become adopted children of God.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: GallagherM
Upvote 0

Emet_Ziton

Active Member
Jul 10, 2021
143
26
64
Calfornia
✟18,625.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Matthew 6:22-23 KJV - "22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. 23 But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!"
What do you make of this from post #27 ? @Emet_Ziton
Here is post #27:
Paul explicitly demonstrates the purpose of God's revelation in nature in Romans 1. God has revealed Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. The purpose is for judgement, not for salvation. Nobody can be saved by general revelation, according to the New Testament, but must be saved by believing in the name of Jesus Christ.
Let me start by saying, God did not reveal Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. That is false. Not only does Paul not say that in Romans chapter 1, he says quite the opposite in Romans 2.

First, let me post Romans 1:18-21 "18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened."

Let's start with, "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness..." His wrath is revealed against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men. Not against all men, but those who 'hold the truth in unrighteousness'. Those that cling to ungodly falsity as truth. Jesus backs this up when He says in John 9:41, "If you were blind, you should have no sin: but now you say, "We see;" therefore your sin remains." So, Paul and Jesus say clinging to a rationalization of wickedness is pretty much a bad idea. Jesus also says in Matthew 6:22-23 "The light of the body is the eye: if therefore your eye is single (or whole - sees clearly), your whole body shall be full of light. But if your eye is evil, your whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in you is darkness, how great is that darkness!" In short, if the 'truth' that you hold to is a lie, and you won't let it go - then how lost are you?

In Romans 1:19 we read, "that which may be known of God is manifest in them (the men who hold to truth in unrighteousness) for God has showed it to them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they (the men who hold to truth in unrighteousness) are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened."

And this is made way more clear in the next chapter. In Romans 2:1 Paul changes gears a bit, moving away from just the wicked people who delight in making excuses that permit them to remain wicked without a burning conscience, and turns his attention to folks who start judging this same wicked group, while doing the very thing that they're judging against. He says, "Therefore you are inexcusable, O man, whoever you art that judges: for wherein you judge another, you condemn yourself; for you that judge do the same things!" And I've known people who, for the sake of appearances, condemn people for things like adultery, when it turns out they themselves are adulterers. And He continues, trying to convince these wicked men to cut it out before God gets ahold of them, saying in verse 4, "Or do you despise the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?"

Remember back in chapter one the whole "wrath of God is revealed against" these men? And yet, in chapter 2 he begins to warm up to the idea that says, "Change your ways! God's goodness, patience, and high pain tolerance is designed to wake you up, so you'll repent." That is exactly the opposite of wrath, if I may point that out. That's mercy instead.

So, already we see that the statement "God has revealed Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. The purpose is for judgement, not for salvation," isn't just wrong, it's directly the opposite of what Paul is saying.

Now, let's look at the last sentence. "Nobody can be saved by general revelation, according to the New Testament, but must be saved by believing in the name of Jesus Christ." This too, is completely wrong, and Paul himself is warming up to it right where we're at.

Here is Romans 2:5-10. "But after your hardness and unrepentant heart you treasure up for yourself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; Who will render to every man according to his deeds: To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, eternal life: But to them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath. Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that does evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; But glory, honor, and peace, to every man that works good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:"

And this is exactly what Jesus said in John 5:28-29. "“Do not marvel at this; for an hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs shall hear His voice, and shall come forth; those who did the good deeds to a resurrection of life, those who committed the evil deeds to a resurrection of judgment."

I know this is terribly unpopular in the modern church - that people say things like, "Sin doesn't get you sent to hell, and righteousness doesn't get you to heaven," but I dare to say that that is holding the truth in unrighteousness. It's a very dangerous thing to teach. Because Jesus says people who do good things go to heaven, and people who do bad things go to hell. And so does Paul.

As to "not being saved by general revelation," Paul says in Romans 2:12-16, "For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law; and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law; for not the hearers of the Law are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified. For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness, and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus."

So, sin causes death, with or without the law. However, notice that he does say "the doers of the Law will be justified." And he makes it clear that you don't have to have the law to do the law. Folks have it written in their hearts even though they've never heard it. I propose this isn't some sort of psychic connection or special revelation, I propose that Jesus told us about it in Matthew 25 when He told the sheep, " inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." He then explains exactly what they did that got them in. "For I was hungry, and you gave me meat: I was thirsty, and you gave me drink: I was a stranger, and you took me in: Naked, and you clothed me: I was sick, and you visited me: I was in prison, and you came unto me."

There it is, a sort of works of the law that make one righteous which is the path to salvation. And more than this, Jesus says as much again when He says in Matthew 7:12, "Therefore all things whatsoever you think that men should do to you, do you even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets."

So, when Paul says in Romans 2 that there are Gentiles who never heard the law, that are doing the law by instinct, and that their conscience can, in fact, defend them on the day when God will judge the secrets of men, then we see that salvation does not require knowing Jesus, or hearing about God. We see that good people go to heaven, and bad people go to hell. Which makes a whole lot more sense, and cures the need to have to try to defend God by saying, "Well, He's God, so if He wants to burn the innocent and call it good, then burning the innocent is good." That - is ridiculous. And evil. And everyone knows it. Every. One.

I know Paul says 'by grace you have been saved through faith, and not by works,' but that doesn't UNSAY all the other things that he and Jesus said. It just means that the 'works' there may not be what most of the modern church seems to think they are.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,254
20,262
US
✟1,450,958.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, when Paul says in Romans 2 that there are Gentiles who never heard the law, that are doing the law by instinct, and that their conscience can, in fact, defend them on the day when God will judge the secrets of men, then we see that salvation does not require knowing Jesus, or hearing about God. We see that good people go to heaven, and bad people go to hell. Which makes a whole lot more sense, and cures the need to have to try to defend God by saying, "Well, He's God, so if He wants to burn the innocent and call it good, then burning the innocent is good." That - is ridiculous. And evil. And everyone knows it. Every. One.

I have agreed with your post, but I think there is a step further of distinction. I would reference Job, who I've pointed out before appears to be a man who knew God through creation:

He is not a mere mortal like me that I might answer him, that we might confront each other in court.

If only there were someone to mediate between us, someone to bring us together, someone to remove God’s rod from me so that his terror would frighten me no more.

Then I would speak up without fear of him, but as it now stands with me, I cannot.


Job is a good person, he knows he is righteous. But here he acknowledges his own insufficiency to make demands of God. Job acknowledged, to paraphrase Vinnette Carroll, "My arms are too short to box with God."

The writer of Hebrews tells us that Jesus is the mediator Job cries out for. Job does not know the name of Jesus, but he knows he needs Jesus.

Similarly, those Greeks Paul noted who worshipped a God they discerned in creation acknowledged their own insufficiency in realizing the God of creation was so far beyond their comprehension that they couldn't even imagine a name for Him, much less define Him.

I think this acknowledgement of insufficiency is the key distinction between people who are righteous by their own judgment and those who are are righteous but acknowledge that they still cannot reach God or even know God by their own righteousness.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Emet_Ziton
Upvote 0

Emet_Ziton

Active Member
Jul 10, 2021
143
26
64
Calfornia
✟18,625.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I have agreed with your post, but I think there is a step further of distinction. I would reference Job, who I've pointed out before appears to be a man who knew God through creation:

He is not a mere mortal like me that I might answer him, that we might confront each other in court.

If only there were someone to mediate between us, someone to bring us together, someone to remove God’s rod from me so that his terror would frighten me no more.

Then I would speak up without fear of him, but as it now stands with me, I cannot.


Job is a good person, he knows he is righteous. But here he acknowledges his own insufficiency to make demands of God. Job acknowledged, to paraphrase Vinnette Carroll, "My arms are too short to box with God."

The writer of Hebrews tells us that Jesus is the mediator Job cries out for. Job does not know the name of Jesus, but he knows he needs Jesus.

Similarly, those Greeks Paul noted who worshipped a God they discerned in creation acknowledged their own insufficiency in realizing the God of creation was so far beyond their comprehension that they couldn't even imagine a name for Him, much less define Him.

I think this acknowledgement of insufficiency is the key distinction between people who are righteous by their own judgment and those who are are righteous but acknowledge that they still cannot reach God or even know God by their own righteousness.
That was quite beautiful. Thank you.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

renniks

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2008
10,682
3,445
✟149,430.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello you and welcome.

Do you believe a person can be saved never reading the bible?

Is there anyway for God to divinely intervene with this person who may have faith in the existence of God never reading the bible?

What are your thoughts on God being powerful enough to even interact with his creation outside the parameters of possibly never hearing, or reading the bible?
Yes. Of course many are saved by hearing a person explain the scriptures. But I believe God can certainly send dreams, visions or just revelations.
 
Upvote 0

Emet_Ziton

Active Member
Jul 10, 2021
143
26
64
Calfornia
✟18,625.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Jesus said to his disciples, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6). Everyone will be without excuse for their unbelief on that final day because they haven't discerned that he is their Creator from the evidence of his creation (Romans 1:18-20). The truth is that all of humanity came into this world as slaves of Satan and need to believe in God through faith in Jesus to become adopted children of God.
I once heard of a man who did not know God and he died. The story went something like this.

While he was dead, a divine being (a man all dressed in white and bright as the sun) came to meet him and explained to him, "You can stay here if you'd like, but if you do, your mother will be deeply distraught by your absence. She loves you very much, and is suffering badly right now." The man asked, "Who are you, and where is it that you're saying I can stay if I want?" The divine being said, "I am Jesus, and we are near heaven right now. You may come with me, or I can return you to your body." The man said, "I think I'll go back to my body so I can let my mother know there's an afterlife, and be a comfort to her." As he was preparing to go back he asked Jesus, "If you're Jesus, and I believe in you, what does that make me?" Jesus said, "A born again Christian."

I realize that the Bible says it is but once for man to die, and then the judgment, and I realize that most of the Christians of the world say that, if you don't know Jesus when you die, you're toast. But, why is that so necessary? Why can't God's love extend beyond death? Jesus did, after all, go and preach to those who were imprisoned in the days of Noah, right?

1 Peter 3:18-20 "For Christ also has once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the Spirit: By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water."

I certainly believe that Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life, and that no man gets to the Father except by Him, but that doesn't mean everyone has to know Him while they're down here. They just have to be the kind of person Jesus says, "Father - I want that one!" He can always clear up any misunderstandings on the other side. Or at least, that makes perfect sense to me, and lines up with a God of actual love.
 
Upvote 0

Emet_Ziton

Active Member
Jul 10, 2021
143
26
64
Calfornia
✟18,625.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Too long; didn't read.

Saint Steven said:
TL;DR
Ah! Ok - quick summary.

God did not reveal Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. That is false. Not only does Paul not say that in Romans chapter 1, he says quite the opposite in Romans 2. Then a little later in Romans 2, Paul explains that, if you have the law written on your heart, you don't have to have heard about it to get to heaven. Jesus agrees with him in John 5:28-29 and Matthew 7:12.

Summation - good people go to heaven, bad people go to hell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ah! Ok - quick summary.

God did not reveal Himself through nature in order to provide a just basis for His rejection of all mankind. That is false. Not only does Paul not say that in Romans chapter 1, he says quite the opposite in Romans 2. Then a little later in Romans 2, Paul explains that, if you have the law written on your heart, you don't have to have heard about it to get to heaven. Jesus agrees with him in John 5:28-29 and Matthew 7:12.

Summation - good people go to heaven, bad people go to hell.
Thanks.

Another TL;DR below.

JUST WHAT DO YOU MEAN - HELL by J. Preston Eby
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You must have the attention sp...SQUIRREL!
Today I do. (I'm not well)
I tried to read your earlier post but my eyes glazed over and I was done. I should have kept the TL;DR to myself. Sorry. Thanks for the summary. Very kind of you.

BTW: J. Preston Eby is a great author. (BTW = by the way)
 
Upvote 0

Emet_Ziton

Active Member
Jul 10, 2021
143
26
64
Calfornia
✟18,625.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Today I do. (I'm not well)
I tried to read your earlier post but my eyes glazed over and I was done. I should have kept the TL;DR to myself. Sorry. Thanks for the summary. Very kind of you.

BTW: J. Preston Eby is a great author. (BTW = by the way)
No worries my friend. You're not going to believe this...but there are people who have said I type way too much.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums