Sure
why don't you cover what is called the "Words of Institution" from the Gospel texts and any other epistles that cover the subject that you want to use, along with Lexicons words, whatever footnotes etc. and explain your version/interpretation of the Lord' Supper aka Holy Communion and why it represents "the Biblical" position.
Words of Institution - Wikipedia
I had asked for demonstration of Scripture in which you saw my understanding as incorrect.
But something else is just as good.
I see Jesus as offering his sacrifice in keeping with the regulations of the OT sacrificial system; i.e., according to the Law, which he came to fulfill.
In the OT, the Israelite
participated,
in fellowship with the priest who offered it, in a sacrificial meal of the sacrifice
itself, the Israelite partaking of his portion at home while the priest partook of his portion in the courtyard up at the Temple, wherein the Israelite
participated in the
benefits of the sacrifice--reconciliation with God and fellowship with the priest who offered it.
Therefore, I see the Lord's Supper as the:
1) NT sacrificial meal on the actual sacrifice itself (slain body and blood of Christ), wherein we
participate in (
1 Corinthians 10:16-18) the benefits of that sacrifice: fellowship with God in
Christ, the Priest who offered it;
2) proclamation to the world of the Lord's death until he comes (
1 Corinthians 11:26); and
3) proclamation of our
own faith in the atoning work of Jesus Christ on the cross for our sin and right
standing with God; "not guilty," righteous, sanctified (set apart).
I don't see the Lord's Supper in the upper room as the New Covenant sacrificial meal, because the New Covenant sacrifice had not been offered, and so there could be no meal on the sacrifice. I see the upper room as the
institution of the NT sacrificial meal on his sacrifice that was
to come.
Nor do I see the "Words of Institution" as necessary, but they certainly are fitting as part of the administration of the ordinance.
I agree with administration of the ordinance only in the assembly of the body, and not privately, for the sake of the church body partaking of one loaf (
1 Corinthians 10:17) and for preserving the purity of the ordinance.
I also think the focus on the "real presence" is contra-Biblical, for two reasons:
1) an offered sacrifice is not living, there is no personal "presence," it's a dead body that was slain/killed. Its
death is the atonement.
2) the NT focus is on our
faith in the Lord's
death for reconciliation and fellowship with God, not some magical "real presence" of a living body, which the sacrifice was not (and which reveals in some cases characteristics of idolatry).