The art of the remake: 10 films that rival the original

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,511
56,182
Woods
✟4,667,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It takes a certain amount of chutzpah to remake a film that is already considered a peerless masterpiece. Netflix were roundly trashed for attempting it with Rebecca. 'Superficial and slapdash' was the New Yorker’s verdict (one of the kinder ones): 'somewhere between a lukewarm retread of Hitchcock’s original and a glossy Instagram feed'. As for the BBC’s Christmas three-part adaptation of Black Narcissus, not even Diana Rigg in her final role could save it from coruscating comparisons with the 1947 Powell and Pressburger film.

This year will see remakes, prequels and sequels of Top Gun, Cinderella and 101 Dalmations to name but three. But for a remake to be successful, it needs a different approach to the original, a new way of telling the story — or else at best it’s pointless, at worse, treasonable. Here are some that got it right.

The Wizard of Oz (1939)


There’s a perception that Hollywood is obsessed at the moment with reboots, with The Witches, Dune and West Side Story some of the latest. But it’s nothing new. One of the classics of cinema, MGM’s technicolour The Wizard of Oz was, in fact a remake of a 1924 silent film, one of several made during the 1920s and 30s.

The Thing (1982)


Unappreciated on its release (partly due to comparisons with the feel-good ET of the same year), John Carpenter’s remake of 1951’s The Thing From Another World has since been reappraised as one the best, most terrifying sci-fi movies ever made. A prequel, also called The Thing was released in 2011 and there are whisperings of another remake n early production.

Murder on the Orient Express (2017)
Director and star Kenneth Branagh could have easily thought better of adding to the litany of Poirot films out there with his own take on the eponymous detective. But such was the success of 2017's Murder on the Orient Express that he's now embarking on a remake of Death on the Nile. Agatha Christie never grows tired, it seems. This first film has a stellar cast including Judi Dench, Penelope Cruz, Johnny Depp and Olivia Coleman and is infinitely watchable. Lend it an evening and you won't be disappointed.

Casino Royale (2006)


The film that launched the hugely successful Daniel Craig reboot of the Bond franchise is technically a remake, since David Niven played 007 in the 1967 spoof. Branded “possibly the most indulgent film ever made” by the legendary film critic, Roger Ebert, the only bit worth salvaging is Burt Bacharach’s Oscar-nominated song for the soundtrack, The Look of Love.

A Star is Born (2018)
Bradley Cooper’s directorial debut is a remake of a remake of a remake and it’s by far the best of the four. The original (1937) doesn’t feature any singing; the Judy Garland and James Mason reimagining (1954) is, at nearly three hours, solely one for fans of extended musical numbers. The shaggy 1970s version with Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson suffers from a lack of chemistry. That’s not something Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga suffer from; Cooper split from the mother of his daughter amidst rumours of a romance with his co-star.

Ocean’s 11 (2001)
Most filmmakers would quail at remaking the 1960 Rat Pack heist film of the same name. But Steven Soderbergh pulled it off with this slick, witty interpretation and a stellar cast to rival Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jnr et al. Though the less said about the sequels, the better.

The Muppets’ Christmas Carol (1992)


Heresy, perhaps, to those who consider Alastair Sim’s portrayal of Scrooge (1951) as the best version of Charles Dickens’ novella. Yet the muppets’ musical is far truer to the plot (apart from turning Jacob Marley into twins, to make full use of Statler and Waldorf). Michael Caine said of the lead role: 'I’m going to play this movie like I’m working with the RSC'. The result is a fine Scrooge, imbued with a touching pathos.

Insomnia (2002)
Christopher Nolan’s most comprehensible film was a remake of a Norwegian movie of the same name. His interpretation, starring Al Pacino as a cop investigating a murder in an Alaskan town where the sun never sets, was praised as an intelligent re-examination of the original. It even got the director, Eric Skjoldbjaerg’s blessing.

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)
Tim Burton’s adaptation of Roald Dahl’s classic children’s novel is, like a Whipple Scrumptious Fudgemallow Delight, far superior to the competition. It’s visually delectable, truer to the story than the 1971 Gene Wilder version (which Dahl disowned) and Burton’s long-time collaborator, Johnny Depp, has never been better cast as the eccentric Willy Wonka.

The Parent Trap (1998)


In her first ever feature film, Lindsay Lohan took the role played by Hayley Mills in the 1961 original, in the tale of a girl who’s reunited with her long-lost twin and schemes to get her divorced parents back together by switching places with her. The new trans Atlantic setting of California and London works a treat, even if Lohan's English accent is a little hammy. It’s remember fondly by many a Millennial as the first PG film they were allowed to watch. Perfect family viewing.

The art of the remake: 10 films that rival the original | The Spectator
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daniisa

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It takes a certain amount of chutzpah to remake a film that is already considered a peerless masterpiece. Netflix were roundly trashed for attempting it with Rebecca. 'Superficial and slapdash' was the New Yorker’s verdict (one of the kinder ones): 'somewhere between a lukewarm retread of Hitchcock’s original and a glossy Instagram feed'. As for the BBC’s Christmas three-part adaptation of Black Narcissus, not even Diana Rigg in her final role could save it from coruscating comparisons with the 1947 Powell and Pressburger film.

This year will see remakes, prequels and sequels of Top Gun, Cinderella and 101 Dalmations to name but three. But for a remake to be successful, it needs a different approach to the original, a new way of telling the story — or else at best it’s pointless, at worse, treasonable. Here are some that got it right.

The Wizard of Oz (1939)


There’s a perception that Hollywood is obsessed at the moment with reboots, with The Witches, Dune and West Side Story some of the latest. But it’s nothing new. One of the classics of cinema, MGM’s technicolour The Wizard of Oz was, in fact a remake of a 1924 silent film, one of several made during the 1920s and 30s.

The Thing (1982)


Unappreciated on its release (partly due to comparisons with the feel-good ET of the same year), John Carpenter’s remake of 1951’s The Thing From Another World has since been reappraised as one the best, most terrifying sci-fi movies ever made. A prequel, also called The Thing was released in 2011 and there are whisperings of another remake n early production.

Murder on the Orient Express (2017)
Director and star Kenneth Branagh could have easily thought better of adding to the litany of Poirot films out there with his own take on the eponymous detective. But such was the success of 2017's Murder on the Orient Express that he's now embarking on a remake of Death on the Nile. Agatha Christie never grows tired, it seems. This first film has a stellar cast including Judi Dench, Penelope Cruz, Johnny Depp and Olivia Coleman and is infinitely watchable. Lend it an evening and you won't be disappointed.

Casino Royale (2006)


The film that launched the hugely successful Daniel Craig reboot of the Bond franchise is technically a remake, since David Niven played 007 in the 1967 spoof. Branded “possibly the most indulgent film ever made” by the legendary film critic, Roger Ebert, the only bit worth salvaging is Burt Bacharach’s Oscar-nominated song for the soundtrack, The Look of Love.

A Star is Born (2018)
Bradley Cooper’s directorial debut is a remake of a remake of a remake and it’s by far the best of the four. The original (1937) doesn’t feature any singing; the Judy Garland and James Mason reimagining (1954) is, at nearly three hours, solely one for fans of extended musical numbers. The shaggy 1970s version with Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson suffers from a lack of chemistry. That’s not something Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga suffer from; Cooper split from the mother of his daughter amidst rumours of a romance with his co-star.

Ocean’s 11 (2001)
Most filmmakers would quail at remaking the 1960 Rat Pack heist film of the same name. But Steven Soderbergh pulled it off with this slick, witty interpretation and a stellar cast to rival Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jnr et al. Though the less said about the sequels, the better.

The Muppets’ Christmas Carol (1992)


Heresy, perhaps, to those who consider Alastair Sim’s portrayal of Scrooge (1951) as the best version of Charles Dickens’ novella. Yet the muppets’ musical is far truer to the plot (apart from turning Jacob Marley into twins, to make full use of Statler and Waldorf). Michael Caine said of the lead role: 'I’m going to play this movie like I’m working with the RSC'. The result is a fine Scrooge, imbued with a touching pathos.

Insomnia (2002)
Christopher Nolan’s most comprehensible film was a remake of a Norwegian movie of the same name. His interpretation, starring Al Pacino as a cop investigating a murder in an Alaskan town where the sun never sets, was praised as an intelligent re-examination of the original. It even got the director, Eric Skjoldbjaerg’s blessing.

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)
Tim Burton’s adaptation of Roald Dahl’s classic children’s novel is, like a Whipple Scrumptious Fudgemallow Delight, far superior to the competition. It’s visually delectable, truer to the story than the 1971 Gene Wilder version (which Dahl disowned) and Burton’s long-time collaborator, Johnny Depp, has never been better cast as the eccentric Willy Wonka.

The Parent Trap (1998)


In her first ever feature film, Lindsay Lohan took the role played by Hayley Mills in the 1961 original, in the tale of a girl who’s reunited with her long-lost twin and schemes to get her divorced parents back together by switching places with her. The new trans Atlantic setting of California and London works a treat, even if Lohan's English accent is a little hammy. It’s remember fondly by many a Millennial as the first PG film they were allowed to watch. Perfect family viewing.

The art of the remake: 10 films that rival the original | The Spectator

... I could be wrong, but I'll just lay down a wager that the new Godzilla VS. Kong will definitely surpass the original. Hard to believe, I know, right ???!!! :rolleyes:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,511
56,182
Woods
✟4,667,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
... I could be wrong, but I'll just lay down a wager that the new Godzilla VS. Kong will definitely surpass the original. Hard to believe, I know, right ???!!! :rolleyes:
Say it ain’t so! Lol! Personally, I thought the remake of A Star is Born did not surpass the original but I’m a fan of classic movies and old Hollywood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,175
9,960
The Void!
✟1,132,868.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Say it ain’t so! Lol! Personally, I thought the remake of A Star is Born did not surpass the original but I’m a fan of classic movies and old Hollywood.

I hear ya. I've never seen the original Barbara Streisand movie, so I went into seeing the Lady Ga Ga version without any comparisons and maybe came away thinking, "Hey, hot bad, Ga Ga!"

But I do still like some of the classic stuff, too. One can't get too much of something like an original classic movie (case in point!):

Elsa-Lanchester-Bride-of-Frankenstein-Boris-Karloff.jpg


Oh, so romantic !!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,511
56,182
Woods
✟4,667,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I hear ya. I've never seen the original Barbara Streisand movie, so I went into seeing the Lady Ga Ga version without any comparisons and maybe came away thinking, "Hey, hot bad, Ga Ga!"

But I do still like some of the classic stuff, too. One can't get too much of something like an original classic movie (case in point!):

Elsa-Lanchester-Bride-of-Frankenstein-Boris-Karloff.jpg


Oh, so romantic !!!
Those old Universal horror classics are pure art imo.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
22,889
6,561
71
✟321,345.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I don't thing The Wizard of Oz really qualifies as a remake. Silent films are even early talkies are different mediums. If it does then Frankenstein and Dracula both have 'remakes' better than the originals.

And some of the others were reaches.

The original The Magnificent Seven is actually quite recognizable as being based on The Seven Samuri! And comparing it to the remake this centrury also shows how the remakes usually suck is so true.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟284,422.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
It takes a certain amount of chutzpah to remake a film that is already considered a peerless masterpiece. Netflix were roundly trashed for attempting it with Rebecca. 'Superficial and slapdash' was the New Yorker’s verdict (one of the kinder ones): 'somewhere between a lukewarm retread of Hitchcock’s original and a glossy Instagram feed'. As for the BBC’s Christmas three-part adaptation of Black Narcissus, not even Diana Rigg in her final role could save it from coruscating comparisons with the 1947 Powell and Pressburger film.

This year will see remakes, prequels and sequels of Top Gun, Cinderella and 101 Dalmations to name but three. But for a remake to be successful, it needs a different approach to the original, a new way of telling the story — or else at best it’s pointless, at worse, treasonable. Here are some that got it right.

The Wizard of Oz (1939)


There’s a perception that Hollywood is obsessed at the moment with reboots, with The Witches, Dune and West Side Story some of the latest. But it’s nothing new. One of the classics of cinema, MGM’s technicolour The Wizard of Oz was, in fact a remake of a 1924 silent film, one of several made during the 1920s and 30s.

The Thing (1982)


Unappreciated on its release (partly due to comparisons with the feel-good ET of the same year), John Carpenter’s remake of 1951’s The Thing From Another World has since been reappraised as one the best, most terrifying sci-fi movies ever made. A prequel, also called The Thing was released in 2011 and there are whisperings of another remake n early production.

Murder on the Orient Express (2017)
Director and star Kenneth Branagh could have easily thought better of adding to the litany of Poirot films out there with his own take on the eponymous detective. But such was the success of 2017's Murder on the Orient Express that he's now embarking on a remake of Death on the Nile. Agatha Christie never grows tired, it seems. This first film has a stellar cast including Judi Dench, Penelope Cruz, Johnny Depp and Olivia Coleman and is infinitely watchable. Lend it an evening and you won't be disappointed.

Casino Royale (2006)


The film that launched the hugely successful Daniel Craig reboot of the Bond franchise is technically a remake, since David Niven played 007 in the 1967 spoof. Branded “possibly the most indulgent film ever made” by the legendary film critic, Roger Ebert, the only bit worth salvaging is Burt Bacharach’s Oscar-nominated song for the soundtrack, The Look of Love.

A Star is Born (2018)
Bradley Cooper’s directorial debut is a remake of a remake of a remake and it’s by far the best of the four. The original (1937) doesn’t feature any singing; the Judy Garland and James Mason reimagining (1954) is, at nearly three hours, solely one for fans of extended musical numbers. The shaggy 1970s version with Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson suffers from a lack of chemistry. That’s not something Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga suffer from; Cooper split from the mother of his daughter amidst rumours of a romance with his co-star.

Ocean’s 11 (2001)
Most filmmakers would quail at remaking the 1960 Rat Pack heist film of the same name. But Steven Soderbergh pulled it off with this slick, witty interpretation and a stellar cast to rival Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jnr et al. Though the less said about the sequels, the better.

The Muppets’ Christmas Carol (1992)


Heresy, perhaps, to those who consider Alastair Sim’s portrayal of Scrooge (1951) as the best version of Charles Dickens’ novella. Yet the muppets’ musical is far truer to the plot (apart from turning Jacob Marley into twins, to make full use of Statler and Waldorf). Michael Caine said of the lead role: 'I’m going to play this movie like I’m working with the RSC'. The result is a fine Scrooge, imbued with a touching pathos.

Insomnia (2002)
Christopher Nolan’s most comprehensible film was a remake of a Norwegian movie of the same name. His interpretation, starring Al Pacino as a cop investigating a murder in an Alaskan town where the sun never sets, was praised as an intelligent re-examination of the original. It even got the director, Eric Skjoldbjaerg’s blessing.

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)
Tim Burton’s adaptation of Roald Dahl’s classic children’s novel is, like a Whipple Scrumptious Fudgemallow Delight, far superior to the competition. It’s visually delectable, truer to the story than the 1971 Gene Wilder version (which Dahl disowned) and Burton’s long-time collaborator, Johnny Depp, has never been better cast as the eccentric Willy Wonka.

The Parent Trap (1998)


In her first ever feature film, Lindsay Lohan took the role played by Hayley Mills in the 1961 original, in the tale of a girl who’s reunited with her long-lost twin and schemes to get her divorced parents back together by switching places with her. The new trans Atlantic setting of California and London works a treat, even if Lohan's English accent is a little hammy. It’s remember fondly by many a Millennial as the first PG film they were allowed to watch. Perfect family viewing.

The art of the remake: 10 films that rival the original | The Spectator

Instead of remaking masterpieces, they should remake bad movies that had great concepts and show the right way to make a good movie.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Sketcher

Born Imperishable
Feb 23, 2004
38,984
9,400
✟380,149.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Scarface belongs on that list, or at least deserves a mention.

The original The Magnificent Seven is actually quite recognizable as being based on The Seven Samuri! And comparing it to the remake this centrury also shows how the remakes usually suck is so true.
Eli Wallach was irreplaceable. And the Comanche in the remake was too weird.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
22,889
6,561
71
✟321,345.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Instead of remaking masterpieces, they should remake bad movies that had great concepts and show the right way to make a good movie.

The Four Feathers was far from great. But it did have some charms. The remake was dereadful, including the addition of a Magic Negro. I fear remakes of bad movies will be even worse movies.

Now remakes of movies where better effects would make a difference does often produce something better.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟284,422.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
The Four Feathers was far from great. But it did have some charms. The remake was dereadful, including the addition of a Magic Negro. I fear remakes of bad movies will be even worse movies.

Now remakes of movies where better effects would make a difference does often produce something better.

Well, any remake can be a poor movie, but if a movie has a great concept, then remaking a bad movie has a much greater chance of being a better movie than remaking a masterpiece. The Princess Bride, but rather it needs to be left alone, and a movie that could have been a masterpiece if it had been made by more capable people needs another shot. If someone did a dreadful remake, then I'd much rather it be of a bad movie than of a masterpiece.
 
Upvote 0

Dreams65

Active Member
Mar 13, 2021
99
54
58
Hessen
✟24,115.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I enjoyed the The Thing 2011 prequel.

Some remakes are good. For example the 1978 remake of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers. Some are just awful and should have never been produced, such as the 2012 remake of Red Dawn.

Here is a fan remake of Star Wars scene 38...considered by many to be better than the original.

 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums