- Nov 25, 2017
- 4,861
- 1,022
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Well, that's arguable, first is quite a claim to make. What would you consider the "nation" of Britons anyways? The island and peoples were a fractured grouping of people, tribes, allegiances, and nationalities aside from the Romans. The Celtic peoples of the islands were far from any unified political nation at that time.
There are other peoples with a similar claim. Ethiopia, Armenia, Kartli, Abyssinia, etc. all have strong claims. The key that makes it so debatable is "nations first to accept Jesus on a national scale". It's fairly easy to say the first to make it the "official state religion", but the claim of "national scale" is really nebulous and hard to pin down as the definition of "nation" is used in different ways.
We shouldn't confuse other countries like Ethiopia that claimed a connection as Jews. Even some in ancient Greece claimed lineage with the Jews in Jerusalem. The Roman Church can claim ascendancy over the British Church all they want, but the simple fact is that early historians recorded the existence of early Celtic Christians while Rome was still pagan, and there was no established Church above ground yet.
Upvote
0