Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 12,257
- 6,447
- 29
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
It's not nitpicking.
I just want to know if we're plants or not, according to science.
Animals.
Upvote
0
It's not nitpicking.
I just want to know if we're plants or not, according to science.
Who are our programmers?We are proto-AI cyborgs
The government funded IT task force working directly under the President of the Adromeda Federation of course! Ok I was trolling and I’m caught lol
the sheer implausibility of life originating
According to my wife, I'm one kind of animal one day, and another the next!For me it varies...
When I'm trying to do math I'm Plant. (Think some kind of turnip.)
When I'm eating BBQ ribs I'm Animal. (Think ravenous wolf.)
Most the rest of the time I'm Other. (Think spirit.)
Really? Seems plausible to me.Ah I kind of think your trying to get at something I have tried to bring up with various atheistic evolutionists, the sheer implausibility of life originating from a single bacteria let alone how that bacteria could some how that bacteria could spontaneously arise from various building blocks in the environment, and then on top of that is how life could diversify and evolve from that single cell into everything we know today. And to do this without any kind of miracle or intelligent supervision....
Anything that exists today is impossible unless the potentiality already exited at the big bang, and in time it just unfolded. It didn’t have to unfold, the lumber that you had in your backyard had the potential to be a garage, but you built a deck instead so the shack’s potential never unfolded. The lumber that you had never had the potential to be an ice sculpture though. The potential for humans to exist was already there one second after the big bangAh I kind of think your trying to get at something I have tried to bring up with various atheistic evolutionists, the sheer implausibility of life originating from a single bacteria let alone how that bacteria could some how that bacteria could spontaneously arise from various building blocks in the environment, and then on top of that is how life could diversify and evolve from that single cell into everything we know today. And to do this without any kind of miracle or intelligent supervision....
Francesco Ayala a Nobel prize winning Evolutionary Biologist, (who is some kind of Catholic monk or priest but a theistic evolutionist) calculated the chance of Evolving "from Bacteria to Man" as some really incredibly low number, its beyond Billions or Trillions to 1. Hugh Ross the Christian Apologist I sometimes follow has described how remote it is. In Physics there is a formula for calculating temperature fluctuations that appear in various situations like why one part of it might be a degree high or lower than another part etc. Anyway just for kicks Ross as a young college student would calculate things like see what the chance or the room with that formula dip down into absolute zero (the temperature of space). And that figure is many many times more problems that the chance of man eventually evolving from bacteria! And this problem is further compounded from things what we know of the geological record etc. Because during much of the earth's existence coming from the Big Bang etc. the earth would have been very hostile to life, it would be too hot, to poisonous, not having air or water to support life etc. But if you go back to the geological record it looks like more or less as soon as the earth is able to support life appears. And it appears in many different forms etc. And basically their is not enough time to do evolution by chance and spontaneous generation of life with the geological record. You do not have millions or billions of years to wait around for some lucky event to happen.
And of course their is much the same thing for evolutionary advantages to slowly evolve. Or to quickly evolve etc. The actual mechanisms of things actually works against the Theory aka defacto religion.
Is that where the reverse osmosis ends?
We are humans, then hominids, then primates, then mammals, then chordates, then animals, then what?
Take us back to abiogenesis.
It's not nitpicking.
I just want to know if we're plants or not, according to science.
Me winner, I picked plant option.I'm just tired of hearing, "Are you a mammal? Are you a chordate? Are you a [whatever]?"
But then they stop short of asking us if we're plants which supposedly had something to do with all this.
Land plants arose earlier than thought—and may have had a bigger impact on the evolution of animals | Science | AAAS